FutureGohanSSJ2 wrote:Mr. Satan's crew are nods to the characters, but they're not even outright named, and nothing about them directly references the time they tried to fight Cell.
So according to you, it makes sense for them to take filler characters with very specific designs and relationships, put them into Super, and unless they're explicitly identified as the specific characters from filler who they completely resemble, then they're obviously
not trying to imply that Super shares a continuity with said filler?
If Super ends with a flash forward to an image of a character that completely resembles Super Saiyan 4 Goku, but they don't explicitly state anything, then, following you're reasoning, they're obviously
not trying to imply that GT comes next.
FutureGohanSSJ2 wrote:Ginyu as a frog was in the manga too, nothing contradictory there.
In Episode 22 Bulma makes it known to Jaco, as well as the audience, that she has had a prior encounter with Frog Ginyu. She has only ever had an official prior encounter with Frog Ginyu in the anime filler. Putting 2 and 2 together, using induction, invoking Occam's Razor, etc. we would be led to believe that Super shares a continuity with this bit of anime filler.
Yet for some reason this absolutely cannot be the case? You have to make a stronger claim than "well they didn't
explicitly say so..." for why this is
not the case. That is, if you're wanting to reasonably convince anyone to share your viewpoint. And if you aren't wanting to reasonably convince people, I don't know why you're posting in the first place.
FutureGohanSSJ2 wrote:And what he showed in flashbacks is also not contradicted by the manga, but DOES run contradictory to the anime's depiction of what happened to him afterward.. Anime had him becoming some sort of Frog King.
Following your reasoning, it's never
explicitly stated that Frog Ginyu in Super was absolutely never, even for a short time relative to his bigger plights as a frog, crowned a king of frogs. Therefore, this contradiction you claim exists doesn't, according to your reasoning.
FutureGohanSSJ2 wrote:Toriyama actually liked Gregory a lot when he first saw him
Toriyama designed Gregory for the anime staff. You're making it seem like you have an incredibly elementary understanding of the production process of the franchise, relative to what one could easily have given the plethora of easily accessible information we have; which is odd considering how adamant you are with your opinions.
FutureGohanSSJ2 wrote:all this would mean is he decided to actually introduce the character into his series. So far I'm not seeing anything super canon-breaking about it either.
All that would mean? You're saying that there's literally only one singular explanation for why a character is included? If that's the case, then why the hell aren't we going with the least assumptive reasons for these cases? Why make a mountain of logic twisting assumptions about the inclusion of Mr. Satan's disciples when the simple explanation of "Super shares a continuity with the anime" is available? Why assume "well, the anime staff decided to include characters with identical designs and relationships to anime only characters, but they just aren't the same characters because of reasons"? It simply appears to be the case that you're so strongly against Super being in continuity with the DB/Z anime that you're providing wholly inconsistent reasoning for different issues with the assertion to the contrary.
Look, it's fine if you want to view Super as having continuity with the manga rather than the anime, but please stop trying to twist things in an effort to make it out that this is the most obvious explanation and forcing that perspective on others. You're failing spectacularly at demonstrating this to be the case, making constant inconsistent and out-of-left-field assumptions, and being demonstrably ignorant of the finer details of the production process.