Kamiccolo9 wrote:
A disagreement would be "I disagree" or, "I think you are wrong." "They're really not" is an objective statement that someone is wrong.
My logic is also the logic of this site, which I posted for you a page or so back, and you subsequently ignored. If you make a point, support it. A single image is not a valid post. Simply agreeing or disagreeing is not a valid post. Rule 3 under the forum rules link, unless that's "too unrealistic."
This "dissection" you refer to could be obtained by a 10 second trip from here to Youtube. I myself did it in 8, but whatever. I don't think, nor would I expect anyone else to, that spending well under a minute to gather your proof is any kind of unrealistic effort.
- In short, you really want everyone to always end their phrases with "in my opinion" so that it becomes obvious to you that everyone isn't stating to the other person "you are wrong!" whenever they state what they think about something. Personally, I thought those types of things were unnecessary...
- The logic of the site regarding the discouragement of posts containing a single image or a single word is intended to mainly discourage spam and posts without relevant content for the topic because posts too short don't really contribute for the topic. This was not the case. It was asked in the topic for why people thought that the CGI was bad, and a visual example was provided. Meaning that the post was relevant for a question that was asked in the topic, provides an example for what was asked and offered some insight into it and reflected the opinion of the poster. What you are claiming is that you would like a more extensive or elaborate list of examples but that doesn't mean that the post fits with the ones the rule mainly intends to remove from the forum.
Sure, I could have written a phrase or two saying that the image I posted was jarring, and that there are various examples of moments like this in the movie, without it being still frames, but I simply didn't see the need since its was obvious that it was just one example and that there were more, and that it wasn't just an issue of still frames, because if it was it wouldn't be worth mentioning and I didn't see any need to go around searching for videos instead of a readily available image. Guess I was wrong...
- Good for you... Meanwhile, who answered him offered a perfectly valid and adequate visual example of why they think the CGI wasn't all that good from the easiest and fastest source they had at hand.
She/Her 
