Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7971
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by dbgtFO » Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:40 pm

Rocketman wrote:Was it ever said why Trunks is 'time patrol'? The dude singlehandedly fucked up the timeline so bad even the best of Daizex's sperglords can't untangle it.
Herms wrote: 1. Goku
2. Vegeta
3. Trunks
4. Gotenks
5. Piccolo

Toriyama drew pictures of the top 5 characters to go along with these poll results (which is how we know about them; they're mentioned in Daizenshuu 1's index), and for the 1995 poll he drew future Trunks rather than kid Trunks, so it seems that even well into the Boo era future Trunks' popularity remained constant. Meanwhile, Gohan fell right off the charts...
Trunks is popular and he travels in time, so he was included just because of that. 8)

User avatar
TripleRach
Moderator
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 5:08 pm
Location: Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by TripleRach » Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:42 pm

Rocketman wrote:Was it ever said why Trunks is 'time patrol'? The dude singlehandedly fucked up the timeline so bad even the best of Daizex's sperglords can't untangle it.
The only other time travelers were Cell and Tapion. Cell is evil and ugly and dead. Tapion is anime-only, which means he couldn't be used. So that just leaves Trunks, who probably had nothing better to do anyway.
-Rachel

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4418
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Zephyr » Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:59 pm

Which version of Trunks is it though? The one that had a fucked up childhood, or the one who fused with Goten?

User avatar
Adamant
I Live Here
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 1:02 pm
Location: Viking Land

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Adamant » Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:24 pm

Rocketman wrote:Was it ever said why Trunks is 'time patrol'? The dude singlehandedly fucked up the timeline so bad even the best of Daizex's sperglords can't untangle it.
"Hey, Trunks is popular, we should make him a time cop or something. He's the character most connected to time travel. Hey Toriyama, can we make Trunks a time cop?"
"Who was Trunks again?"
"That time traveler"
"There was a time traveler in Dragonball? Oh, uh, sure, go ahead, that sounds like it would make sense. I think."
Satan wrote:Lortedrøm! Bøh slog min datter ihjel! Hvad bilder du dig ind, Bøh?! Nu kommer Super-Satan og rydder op!

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:53 pm

HECTOR4 wrote: DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
No it isn't. It's an MMORPG. If Toriyama were to make a Manga version of DBO, then that would be the official continuation of the Manga.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by B » Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:41 pm

Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
HECTOR4 wrote: DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
No it isn't. It's an MMORPG. If Toriyama were to make a Manga version of DBO, then that would be the official continuation of the Manga.
You speak as if fiction has never told stories within a fixed continuity through different mediums.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
Chibi Mystic Gohan
I Live Here
Posts: 2890
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:55 pm
Location: Wakusei Bejeeter

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Chibi Mystic Gohan » Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:00 am

B wrote:
Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
HECTOR4 wrote: DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
No it isn't. It's an MMORPG. If Toriyama were to make a Manga version of DBO, then that would be the official continuation of the Manga.
You speak as if fiction has never told stories within a fixed continuity through different mediums.
Such as The Matrix franchise, with two canonical video games (Enter the Matrix, which takes place during The Matrix Reloaded, and The Matrix Online, an MMORPG continuing the story after The Matrix Revolutions; very similar to Dragon Ball Online's concept). Or the Halo franchise, which started as a series of video games, and that now has a canonical novel series, comic books, anime films, etc.
君と再会ったとき 子供のころ大切に想っていた景色を思い出したんだ
僕と踊ってくれないか 光と影の Winding Road いまでも彼に夢中なの?

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Sun Nov 07, 2010 12:49 am

How are the translations going for the next couple of pages that were posted a few pages back? :wink:
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15276
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Chuquita » Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:24 am

I wish I knew if Bulma and Chi-Chi were still alive in year 801....they're not mentioned anywhere, are they?
On hiatus.

User avatar
HECTOR4
Regular
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by HECTOR4 » Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:06 am

Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
HECTOR4 wrote: DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
No it isn't. It's an MMORPG. If Toriyama were to make a Manga version of DBO, then that would be the official continuation of the Manga.
No, a story can continue in any medium. A videogame is just as valid a storytelling medium like a book, a manga or TV series.

And NTL has said in interviews that DBO is the official continuation of the manga.

Senzu_Bean
I Live Here
Posts: 2262
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:31 am

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Senzu_Bean » Sun Nov 07, 2010 2:01 pm

HECTOR4 wrote:
Piccolo Daimaoh wrote:
HECTOR4 wrote: DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
No it isn't. It's an MMORPG. If Toriyama were to make a Manga version of DBO, then that would be the official continuation of the Manga.
No, a story can continue in any medium. A videogame is just as valid a storytelling medium like a book, a manga or TV series.

And NTL has said in interviews that DBO is the official continuation of the manga.
There is no way you can convince someone that DBO is the official continuation of the manga. There are people in this fandom that actually believe they own Dragonball.

User avatar
HECTOR4
Regular
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:13 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by HECTOR4 » Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:03 pm

Senzu_Bean wrote:
There is no way you can convince someone that DBO is the official continuation of the manga. There are people in this fandom that actually believe they own Dragonball.
It is not convincing or not convincing. Is that it is. It is what it is. It's official. DBO is the continuation of DB manga.

You can accept or not, but it is a fact. I am not making this up.

Once again, sorry for my bad english.

User avatar
Travis Touchdown
Regular
Posts: 734
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 6:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Travis Touchdown » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:05 pm

Well what makes DBO more official than DBGT?

Both claim to be Dragon Ball's sequel with some involvement by Toriyama. He drew character art for both and had a small and mostly insignificant hand in the story. Heck, he even NAMED GT.

When it boils down to it, I don't really think one can say DBO is the TRUE OFFICIAL sequel to Dragon Ball anymore than one could claim GT is. I'd lump it into the same category as GT, which was in Toriyama's words; a grand side-story.
"Hey girlfriend, why don't you throw a few more punches? Afraid you might break a nail or somethin?"
Ken - Street Fighter II

User avatar
Makaioshin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Location: Kokomo

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Makaioshin » Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:13 pm

Travis Touchdown wrote:Well what makes DBO more official than DBGT?

Both claim to be Dragon Ball's sequel with some involvement by Toriyama. He drew character art for both and had a small and mostly insignificant hand in the story. Heck, he even NAMED GT.

When it boils down to it, I don't really think one can say DBO is the TRUE OFFICIAL sequel to Dragon Ball. I'd lump it into the same category as GT, which was in Toriyama's words; a grand side-story.
It's not more official, just a sequel to a different continuity of Dragon Ball. GT to the animated series and Online to the comic.

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Rocketman » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:07 am

The problem with that is DBO is absolute shit, therefore it can't be tied to the manga, which is not shit.

User avatar
Makaioshin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Location: Kokomo

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Makaioshin » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:12 am

Rocketman wrote:The problem with that is DBO is absolute shit, therefore it can't be tied to the manga, which is not shit.
You don't have to accept it, just as people don't accept GT as the sequel to Z because they don't like it.

User avatar
B
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5563
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:15 am
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by B » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:16 am

Rocketman wrote:The problem with that is DBO is absolute shit, therefore it can't be tied to the manga, which is not shit.
911, hello? Quick, there's been a murder here! My best friend, Fun NotSoSerioustein has been shot! Once in both kneecaps, and thrice in the chest!

If I asked why it was shit, would you answer without utter bullshit sarcasm? Of course, it's not like it matters. If canon were based on quality, then the Saiyan arc never happened.
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Rocketman » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:35 am

B wrote:If I asked why it was shit, would you answer without utter bullshit sarcasm?
Quoting myself,

"There is nothing new to this game. It's so unoriginal that its entire gimmick (after "create your own character who looks exactly like one of the cast!") is based around revisiting the series again and doing shit there again. Just look at the enemy pictures posted - it's all robot or miscolored versions of Dragonball characters.

Hell, look at the other posters or whatnot - HEY it's Karin's Land! Remember that? Huh? Huh? Nobody even bothered to remove that pillar in the last three hundred years either, so it all looks just like you left it!

Attack of the Saiyans and earlier, Buu's Fury did the same thing and by now I'm sick of it. How many times are we going to revisit Pilaf's wrecked castle? How many times are we going to fight Cyborg Tao Pai Pai?

And the icing on the shit cake for me is that it's not even the real characters now, it's Mary-Sue self-inserts running around going Super, recycling centuries-old moves and going back in time to beat up the real cast."

Also, Buu's sex scene. Ugggh. *shudder*

User avatar
Citrinate
Newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:36 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Citrinate » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:41 am

HECTOR4 wrote:DBO is the oficial continuation of the manga
They've made it clear that it's officially a continuation of the manga, but I've never read anywhere that it's an official continuation (canon).
Travis Touchdown wrote:Well what makes DBO more official than DBGT?
Toriyama having creative control over DBO and allowing GT to be retconned surely says something.

Piccolo Daimaoh
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5407
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:49 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Online Original Story

Post by Piccolo Daimaoh » Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:41 am

Travis Touchdown wrote:Well what makes DBO more official than DBGT?

Both claim to be Dragon Ball's sequel with some involvement by Toriyama. He drew character art for both and had a small and mostly insignificant hand in the story. Heck, he even NAMED GT.

When it boils down to it, I don't really think one can say DBO is the TRUE OFFICIAL sequel to Dragon Ball anymore than one could claim GT is. I'd lump it into the same category as GT, which was in Toriyama's words; a grand side-story.
This. Has Toriyama come out and said: "this is the official continuation of my Manga"? I honestly doubt he would.

Post Reply