How is reused animation not a fault? It stops many from being immersed in the story, and whether they try to hide it or not is irrelevant. Saying that reusing animation is not a fault in itself but rather the result of a fault is pretty much the same thing, it's affects the viewers experience either way. Even if it looks good, I couldn't even pay attention when animation was being reused because it was just so much.8bitdee wrote:How is reusing animation a "fault" exactly? It's not like Toei is trying to hide the fact that they've been reusing animation; they're pretty obvious at pointing it out. Is it a short-cut to pump out episodes on time? Yep. Is it a sign of a struggling animation studio? Yep. Is it a fault though? The fault may be in Toeis's failure to properly manage its workload so they don't have to resort to previously used animation, but the fault is not on the actual act of using it. It's not even bad animation, everything that people complain about being reused in that episode looks GOOD.majinwarman wrote:Baggie_Saiyan wrote:I still enjoyed the episode but I'm not going to forget about its faults.
So I don't understand why people hate it so much and why they think it was such a taboo. Or would you rather have another SSJ3 vs Beerus episode? Hey, at least it's not reused animation!
Yes, it's better than bad animation, but getting shot in the gut is better than dying, doesn't make getting shot in the gut any better.