"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:38 pm

I'm glad toriyama call out the constant homages and the battles are too safe,chapter 29 is a sign of toyo taking advice from AT which i'm grateful for.I liked the interview,i can't wait for volume 5
Mostly active on discord.

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:38 pm

Toyotaro got him to bring back Vegetto, but Toriyama already made the retcon for the potara before that, because he was using it as an excuse for Zamasu to defuse so Goku and Vegeta could beat him
Basically, the whole "Zamasu isn't a Kaioshin so his fusion is temporary" thing came from Toriyama.

Pannaliciour
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Pannaliciour » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:39 pm

Whats the matter with you people. Its an interview about the manga with Toriyama and Toyotora. Ofcourse he wont say something like he doesnt use my original draft good. He probably is sitting next to him in that interview. Cant attack him (disrespect).

Now people claiming manga is better?? Loll. Its the same what we already knew. Toriyama gives the script and anime and Toyo breaking it up into episodes/chapters.

That interview only proves that Toyo is using stuff that wasnt from Toriyama (ssj.god Vegeta and training/healing Trunks). How can did be any better or worse than anime??? They are doing both the same shit.

User avatar
emperior
I Live Here
Posts: 4347
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
Location: Dragon World
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by emperior » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:44 pm

We know for a fact that Toriyama rewrote BoG cause he didn't like the original script, and only used the God of Destruction and Super Saiyan God concepts from the original script. He also said the original design for SSG was "completely wrong" and Yamamuro suggested his design twice cause he really liked it.
Toriyama was also very critical of Evolution, and also criticized the anime for making Goku's gi red and for making him more of a righteous hero.
Toriyama definitely cares about Dragon Ball, he admitted it himself. Toyotaro just happens to be very good for Toriyama and his ideas and storyboards are seemingly always approved.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

What I consider canonical

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:44 pm

The gr wrote:I'm glad toriyama call out the constant homages and the battles are too safe,chapter 29 is a sign of toyo taking advice from AT which i'm grateful for.I liked the interview,i can't wait for volume 5
29 still has homages.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
Helios518
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 920
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:42 pm
Location: Not where you think

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Helios518 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:47 pm

emperior wrote: I disagree. A very reliable source (kei17) reported, a while ago, that Toriyama was so angry with the anime's poor quality he wanted to quit Super, and they had to give him ideas for the next arc (FT arc) to keep him on board.
This means he actually cares somewhat, along with the fact that he supervises every storyboard. He's just very laid back and not too oppressive - I would speculate it's got something to do with his "hatred" towards his old editors, who disapproved many of his ideas.
While the anime and manga might not be the very best thing in some parts, they are both definitely Dragon Ball, they are doing well and are both good products. Toei and Toyo are following Toriyama's overall vision, so he's ok with them adding their own spin to spice things up in between plot points. Kaioken, for example, was well received and SSG returning too. Toyotaro also made a good call on fans wanting Vegetto/Goku and Vegeta fusing, and it made sense considering Kaioshin was there, Zamasu and Black fused too, and the retcon might prove useful in the future to give a better motivation to Goku and Vegeta not fusing other than pride.
Wow, I knew Toriyama was mad with DBS but did he actually say he wanted to quit DBS?
Why I use "Geran" instead of "Jiren"

User avatar
dbgtFO
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7974
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:07 pm
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by dbgtFO » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:48 pm

Where are people getting the idea that Toriyama mentioned the homages? I only saw him mention the battle scenes needing to be less safe and more rough.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:49 pm

emperior wrote:Toriyama definitely cares about Dragon Ball, he admitted it himself. Toyotaro just happens to be very good for Toriyama and his ideas and storyboards are seemingly always approved.
Toriyama knows DB will be around for a lot longer than he can support it so it seems like instead of taking over everything and forcing everyone to follow him, he's being more of a teacher and letting them do their own thing while he guides them in the right direction so when he does finally walk away, it'll be in good hands.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:50 pm

HeroR wrote:
The gr wrote:I'm glad toriyama call out the constant homages and the battles are too safe,chapter 29 is a sign of toyo taking advice from AT which i'm grateful for.I liked the interview,i can't wait for volume 5
29 still has homages.
Wait which one,because i'm hearing a user mention tori calling out the homages
    The chapter had good action,it wasn't safe and it had more dynamic poses which is probaly toyotaro taking his advice of making battle less safe i suppose
    Last edited by The gr on Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Mostly active on discord.

    Pannaliciour
    OMG CRAZY REGEN
    Posts: 774
    Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:04 pm

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by Pannaliciour » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:51 pm

    emperior wrote:We know for a fact that Toriyama rewrote BoG cause he didn't like the original script, and only used the God of Destruction and Super Saiyan God concepts from the original script. He also said the original design for SSG was "completely wrong" and Yamamuro suggested his design twice cause he really liked it.
    Toriyama was also very critical of Evolution, and also criticized the anime for making Goku's gi red and for making him more of a righteous hero.
    Toriyama definitely cares about Dragon Ball, he admitted it himself. Toyotaro just happens to be very good for Toriyama and his ideas and storyboards are seemingly always approved.
    The Buu saga Goku (manga) was exactly the same as the anime goku. The hero not the fighter. How are people blaming the anime for that. Tori made Goku wanting to save people instead of fighting buu.

    Btw the Anime (super) makes Goku stupid and fighthungry again. Isnt that what Tori wants.
    Last edited by Pannaliciour on Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

    HeroR
    Kicks it Old-School
    Posts: 8306
    Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:51 pm

    Helios518 wrote:
    emperior wrote: I disagree. A very reliable source (kei17) reported, a while ago, that Toriyama was so angry with the anime's poor quality he wanted to quit Super, and they had to give him ideas for the next arc (FT arc) to keep him on board.
    This means he actually cares somewhat, along with the fact that he supervises every storyboard. He's just very laid back and not too oppressive - I would speculate it's got something to do with his "hatred" towards his old editors, who disapproved many of his ideas.
    While the anime and manga might not be the very best thing in some parts, they are both definitely Dragon Ball, they are doing well and are both good products. Toei and Toyo are following Toriyama's overall vision, so he's ok with them adding their own spin to spice things up in between plot points. Kaioken, for example, was well received and SSG returning too. Toyotaro also made a good call on fans wanting Vegetto/Goku and Vegeta fusing, and it made sense considering Kaioshin was there, Zamasu and Black fused too, and the retcon might prove useful in the future to give a better motivation to Goku and Vegeta not fusing other than pride.
    Wow, I knew Toriyama was mad with DBS but did he actually say he wanted to quit DBS?
    That’s what kei17 claimed someone told them.

    Personally, don’t really believed it since Toriyama didn’t start writing the Future Trunks Saga unti Oct 2016. Super would just be going into the Resurrection ‘F’ stuff, so why would he leave before the anime even got to his original material?
    Kanassa wrote:
    precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
    Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

    User avatar
    LightBing
    I Live Here
    Posts: 4031
    Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by LightBing » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:54 pm

    dbgtFO wrote:Where are people getting the idea that Toriyama mentioned the homages? I only saw him mention the battle scenes needing to be less safe and more rough.
    Yeah I was also wondering this. Seems people are holding on to the "chasing after my DB" and the battle scenes line to make this up. It's possible it's in reference to the homages but not clearly stated anywhere; at least in Herms translation.

    User avatar
    sintzu
    Banned
    Posts: 13583
    Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by sintzu » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:55 pm

    Pannaliciour wrote:The Buu saga Goku (manga) was exactly the same as the anime goku. The hero not the fighter.
    It seems like Toriyama wanted Goku one way but his writing ended up turning him into something else, most likely unintentionally. Yeah the anime played up his heroic side but that's because he was kind of like that in the manga as well.
    July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

    User avatar
    emperior
    I Live Here
    Posts: 4347
    Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:52 pm
    Location: Dragon World
    Contact:

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by emperior » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:56 pm

    I believe Toriyama is "growing" Toyotaro up so that when Super is over, Toyo will continue Dragon Ball by making his new, official manga probably set in a era without Goku.
    悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”

    What I consider canonical

    User avatar
    OLKv3
    I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
    Posts: 1822
    Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

    Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

    Post by OLKv3 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:56 pm

    The gr wrote:
    HeroR wrote:
    The gr wrote:I'm glad toriyama call out the constant homages and the battles are too safe,chapter 29 is a sign of toyo taking advice from AT which i'm grateful for.I liked the interview,i can't wait for volume 5
    29 still has homages.
    Wait which one,because i'm hearing a user mention tori calling out the homages
      The chapter had good action,it wasn't safe and it had more dynamic poses which is probaly toyotaro taking his advice of making battle less safe i suppose
      Toppo's kick on Goku was Vegeta kicking Cell
      SSG Goku charging at Toppo was the exact same pose that SSB Goku had when he charged Merged Zamasu
      Those are the only two I know of

      Meshack
      OMG CRAZY REGEN
      Posts: 892
      Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:06 pm

      Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

      Post by Meshack » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:57 pm

      Toyotarou is the only one I can see understanding Gokuh as a character that’s not Toriyama.

      User avatar
      Totamo
      I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
      Posts: 1885
      Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:24 pm

      Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

      Post by Totamo » Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:59 pm

      HeroR wrote:
      Totamo wrote:
      HeroR wrote:
      They can because Toriyama supervised and are okay with some of their ideas. So he’s more than 30% since everything goes through him.
      You know damn well Toriyama likes to take the easy way when it comes to this sort of thing, notice how we never once heard of him telling them an idea was bad or giving a disapproval of an idea.


      I am thoroughly convinced Toriyama does not care what they do and lets them do what they want, they give him an idea, he will say go ahead and do it then they will put his name on it. Its a marketing tool because his name is powerful.


      And if you disagree, find one interview on super where Toriyama said no to one thing they proposed.
      If Toriyama doesn’t want to do something, he won’t do it. And just because we ‘never once heard of him telling them an idea was bad or giving a disapproval of an idea’ doesn’t mean it doesn’t happens. After all, the absent of evidence isn’t evidence. Especially when we have seen some of the corrections he did for the manga.

      He cares. He’s just loose about people using their own ideas. It’s no different when his editors used to give him suggests during his manga days.

      Where is your proof that he approves everything since you’re the one making the charge. The burden of proof is on you, especially since the absent of evidence isn’t evidence.
      The simple fact that he doesn't care how point a gets to point b. I argue as a storyteller, thats pretty important You only need to read both the anime and the manga to know that.

      User avatar
      The gr
      I Live Here
      Posts: 2856
      Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

      Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

      Post by The gr » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:01 pm

      OLKv3 wrote: Toppo's kick on Goku was Vegeta kicking Cell
      SSG Goku charging at Toppo was the exact same pose that SSB Goku had when he charged Merged Zamasu
      Those are the only two I know of
      I see,i wouldn't call ssg one a homage rather a recycled pose
      Mostly active on discord.

      HeroR
      Kicks it Old-School
      Posts: 8306
      Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

      Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

      Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:02 pm

      Totamo wrote:
      HeroR wrote:
      Totamo wrote: You know damn well Toriyama likes to take the easy way when it comes to this sort of thing, notice how we never once heard of him telling them an idea was bad or giving a disapproval of an idea.


      I am thoroughly convinced Toriyama does not care what they do and lets them do what they want, they give him an idea, he will say go ahead and do it then they will put his name on it. Its a marketing tool because his name is powerful.


      And if you disagree, find one interview on super where Toriyama said no to one thing they proposed.
      If Toriyama doesn’t want to do something, he won’t do it. And just because we ‘never once heard of him telling them an idea was bad or giving a disapproval of an idea’ doesn’t mean it doesn’t happens. After all, the absent of evidence isn’t evidence. Especially when we have seen some of the corrections he did for the manga.

      He cares. He’s just loose about people using their own ideas. It’s no different when his editors used to give him suggests during his manga days.

      Where is your proof that he approves everything since you’re the one making the charge. The burden of proof is on you, especially since the absent of evidence isn’t evidence.
      The simple fact that he doesn't care how point a gets to point b. I argue as a storyteller, thats pretty important You only need to read both the anime and the manga to know that.
      Thsat isn’t evidence. That is Toriyama being okay with other people’s ideas and want them to be creative. He even told Toyo to stop trying to be him.

      The anime and manga are two different takes on the same story because Toriyama wants it that way.
      Kanassa wrote:
      precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
      Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

      User avatar
      namekiansaiyan
      I Live Here
      Posts: 4358
      Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 9:39 am

      Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

      Post by namekiansaiyan » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:02 pm

      Anyone working on Dragon Ball now should ban themselves from having any throwbacks.

      I just find it weird that they don't want to make anything new that would be remembered.

      Post Reply