"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:03 pm

emperior wrote:I believe Toriyama is "growing" Toyotaro up so that when Super is over, Toyo will continue Dragon Ball by making his new, official manga probably set in a era without Goku.
If you take Goku out of DB then you don't have DB.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:03 pm

The gr wrote:
OLKv3 wrote: Toppo's kick on Goku was Vegeta kicking Cell
SSG Goku charging at Toppo was the exact same pose that SSB Goku had when he charged Merged Zamasu
Those are the only two I know of
I see,i wouldn't call ssg one a homage rather a recycled pose
They're all recycled tbh. I don't see them as homages because every fan fiction artist does the same thing. It's lack of creativity for the fights. The only true homage imo was when he had Vegeta pretend he was going to kill Cabba.

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:05 pm

namekiansaiyan wrote:Anyone working on Dragon Ball now should ban themselves from having any throwbacks.

I just find it weird that they don't want to make anything new that would be remembered.
They are introducing new concept and you are kinda exagerating with the whole ban
Mostly active on discord.

User avatar
sintzu
Banned
Posts: 13583
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:41 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by sintzu » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:05 pm

namekiansaiyan wrote:Anyone working on Dragon Ball now should ban themselves from having any throwbacks.

I just find it weird that they don't want to make anything new that would be remembered.
Modern DB as a whole is full of throwbacks, weather it's small things like fighting moves or outright plot points like a female Broly. they do them because they're safe and know people like and recognize them.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4041
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:08 pm

Both the manga and the anime suffer from lack of inspiration and/or fear to try new things. I'm betting on fear of trying new things, coupled with pressure to repeat the successful formula.

It's one of the main things holding back Super, I'm glad Mr.Toriyama is pushing Toyotarõ and hopefully the anime staff to try new things.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:10 pm

LightBing wrote:Both the manga and the anime suffer from lack of inspiration and/or fear to try new things. I'm betting on fear of trying new things, coupled with pressure to repeat the successful formula.

It's one of the main things holding back Super, I'm glad Mr.Toriyama is pushing Toyotarõ and hopefully the anime staff to try new things.
Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
GreatSaiyaman123
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1938
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2016 11:59 am
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by GreatSaiyaman123 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:14 pm

HeroR wrote: Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
That's the bad thing in Dragon Ball.
They create a lot of characters full of potential only for their own sagas and then they either get killed or turn into a good guy and go to the bench a few seasons later. Hope Toei doesn't repeat this with the Universe 6 characters. I'm sure Toyotaro will though, the manga has been pretty rushed.
Guardian of the city, I am the one and only...Great Saiyaman!

User avatar
The gr
I Live Here
Posts: 2856
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:58 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by The gr » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:18 pm

GreatSaiyaman123 wrote:
HeroR wrote: Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
That's the bad thing in Dragon Ball.
They create a lot of characters full of potential only for their own sagas and then they either get killed or turn into a good guy and go to the bench a few seasons later. Hope Toei doesn't repeat this with the Universe 6 characters. I'm sure Toyotaro will though, the manga has been pretty rushed.
What does rush have to shafting character and the manga stop doing that a long time ago,they use hit and u6 in the Top and by looking at the threatment of kale and caulifla,they won't be shafted
Mostly active on discord.

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4041
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:22 pm

HeroR wrote:
LightBing wrote:Both the manga and the anime suffer from lack of inspiration and/or fear to try new things. I'm betting on fear of trying new things, coupled with pressure to repeat the successful formula.

It's one of the main things holding back Super, I'm glad Mr.Toriyama is pushing Toyotarõ and hopefully the anime staff to try new things.
Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
They do new things sometimes not necessarily because of old or new characters; with Cabba they repeated his plot point of the U6 Arc.
I'm talking about not repeating ideas from the original material, like Frost having the same poses as Freeza, "shocking" people with Goku losing while using Kaioken x20", bringing back the Kaioken, bringing back Vegetto, etc...

Both mediums are full of this. The manga more with copying poses and fight sections, the anime more with plot points.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:35 pm

LightBing wrote:
HeroR wrote:
LightBing wrote:Both the manga and the anime suffer from lack of inspiration and/or fear to try new things. I'm betting on fear of trying new things, coupled with pressure to repeat the successful formula.

It's one of the main things holding back Super, I'm glad Mr.Toriyama is pushing Toyotarõ and hopefully the anime staff to try new things.
Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
They do new things sometimes not necessarily because of old or new characters; with Cabba they repeated his plot point of the U6 Arc.
I'm talking about not repeating ideas from the original material, like Frost having the same poses as Freeza, "shocking" people with Goku losing while using Kaioken x20", bringing back the Kaioken, bringing back Vegetto, etc...

Both mediums are full of this. The manga more with copying poses and fight sections, the anime more with plot points.
Not really since Cabba even before talking to Vegeta again was much more sure of himself.

Why is people being shocked the Kaioken failed be a ‘repeat’. Are you saying that shouldn’t be shock? The Kaioken itself isn’t even a repeat because Goku is using it in a way that was impossible before.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by OLKv3 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:37 pm

HeroR wrote:
LightBing wrote:Both the manga and the anime suffer from lack of inspiration and/or fear to try new things. I'm betting on fear of trying new things, coupled with pressure to repeat the successful formula.

It's one of the main things holding back Super, I'm glad Mr.Toriyama is pushing Toyotarõ and hopefully the anime staff to try new things.
Both the manga and anime do new things. Just with the newer characters and not the older cast.
They reuse too many iconic moments for the older cast
Like the recent episode was just a redraw of Goku using SS3 in the Janemba movie. Both anime and manga rely way too much on older scenes/poses

User avatar
mfwlegend3
Regular
Posts: 642
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:00 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by mfwlegend3 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:48 pm

Man, Black sounds even more pathetic in the outline than he does in Toyotaro's version. I have a feeling he would have been more generic too.

User avatar
LightBing
I Live Here
Posts: 4041
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:47 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by LightBing » Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:51 pm

HeroR wrote:Why is people being shocked the Kaioken failed be a ‘repeat’. Are you saying that shouldn’t be shock? The Kaioken itself isn’t even a repeat because Goku is using it in a way that was impossible before.
It's an exact copy of Goku using the Kaioken x20 against Freeza. Tenshinhan goes don't worry Goku still can go x20, Kaio says he's already using and everyone goes "oh no"! Like they didn't even bother to change it a bit. That's why I had shocked in parenthesis, it's like building up a mystery that you already solved.
Hell, the whole Jiren fight is similar to the fight against Freeza until Goku lost. Failed Genki-Dama, Goku being outmatched even with Kaioken and him getting a new transformation.

Bringing back the Kaioken is reusing old ideas, Mr.Toriyama didn't use it after SSJ was introduced. I argue that by itself should be a reason in-universe why the form couldn't be stacked with anything, no matter what the any makes up to justify it. To me it's just forcing it in because they want to use it, of course that's just my opinion.

Anyway this has turned into a anime discussion, wrong topic for it.

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15303
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Chuquita » Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:00 pm

Meshack wrote:
Chuquita wrote: I do prefer Gokû and Vegeta working together rather than taking the shortcut of Vegetto (and now the potara's been retconned) but if I think of it in the vein of Toyotaro as an editor rather than the sole writer I can be more at peace with it
Vegetto is Gokuh and Vegeta working together
Yeah, but I mean as two people, not two parts of the same entity. Think that final battle against Kid Buu.
On hiatus.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:10 pm

LightBing wrote: It's an exact copy of Goku using the Kaioken x20 against Freeza. Tenshinhan goes don't worry Goku still can go x20, Kaio says he's already using and everyone goes "oh no"! Like they didn't even bother to change it a bit. That's why I had shocked in parenthesis, it's like building up a mystery that you already solved.
Hell, the whole Jiren fight is similar to the fight against Freeza until Goku lost. Failed Genki-Dama, Goku being outmatched even with Kaioken and him getting a new transformation.

Bringing back the Kaioken is reusing old ideas, Mr.Toriyama didn't use it after SSJ was introduced. I argue that by itself should be a reason in-universe why the form couldn't be stacked with anything, no matter what the any makes up to justify it. To me it's just forcing it in because they want to use it, of course that's just my opinion.

Anyway this has turned into a anime discussion, wrong topic for it.
That was a callback sure, but it isn't as big as you're making it.

Also, it really isn't outside the Kaioken and Spirit Bomb. Goku was a good match against Freeza until he went 50%, then he got stomped. With Jiren, Goku was outmatched from the ump. The Spirit Bomb failed to kill Freeza, but Freeza was overwhelmed by it and he thought he would die. Jiren pushed the entire thing back with ease and nearly killed Goku with it.
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

Ilikepictures-meh
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 231
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Ilikepictures-meh » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:09 pm

sintzu wrote:
Sandubadear wrote:Was this posted already?

[spoiler]Image
Image[/spoiler]
I don't think so. I like how it calls out the potara's time limit, it's the little things like this that make the manga so good.
You're ridiculous. It doesn't "call out" the potara time limit lad. It's just an attempt at an explanation for why we didn't know about the time limit until now. Be for real

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15303
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by Chuquita » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:59 pm

Zamasu had a pet pig?! With wings?! How "When pigs fly!".
On hiatus.

User avatar
nato25
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1501
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:17 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by nato25 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:59 pm

Ahh so they're kind of retconning the 4 kais as being students of the Grand Supreme Kai now? That's cool I like that idea and a great way to try and explain why there was four of them. (On second thought did the Manga even have the 4 Supereme Kais or was that only the anime?)

User avatar
nato25
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1501
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:17 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by nato25 » Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:01 pm

Chuquita wrote:Zamasu had a pet pig?! With wings?! How "When pigs fly!".
That's cool when you think of it, just like how King Kai has Bubbles his pet monkey, so every Kai has there own little pet. Sometimes these extra pages are my absolute favourite thing from the manga.

HeroR
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8306
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:28 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread

Post by HeroR » Tue Oct 31, 2017 8:28 pm

nato25 wrote:Ahh so they're kind of retconning the 4 kais as being students of the Grand Supreme Kai now? That's cool I like that idea and a great way to try and explain why there was four of them. (On second thought did the Manga even have the 4 Supereme Kais or was that only the anime?)
That was in the manga. Four Supreme Kais
Kanassa wrote:
precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.

Post Reply