Maybe you were thinking about this one? It doesn't look that good but is nice nonetheless (if someone knows frenchKingdom Heartless wrote:A few months ago, someone posted scans from a bootleg GT manga, and it surprisingly looked really good. If it looked as good as that one did, I think I would enjoy reading it.
GT as Manga
Re: GT as Manga
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: GT as Manga
Because not every DB-related thing Toriyama makes is automatically good. You're claiming that if GT had Toriyama behind it, it would be automatically good, when that's not the case and someone who isn't Toriyama can make just as good a DB fiction as Toriyama.Saiga wrote:I'm not sure how you're unable to make sense of such a simple statement. Why doesn't it make sense?Piccolo Daimao wrote:That doesn't make any sense.Fox666 wrote:generally Dragon Ball-related stuff that are not crated by Toriyama aren't good.
It just comes across as quite naive and fanboyish. Someone can probably explain it better, but I hope you understand what I mean.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: GT as Manga
I'm not making that claim and Fox isn't making that claim. Fox is simply stating that generally the Dragon Ball material that isn't created by Toriyama isn't good. That means, generally, the movies, filler etc. Isn't very good. That doesn't mean that Fox is saying anything created by Toriyama is automatically good. It seems you're reading far too much into this.Piccolo Daimao wrote:
Because not every DB-related thing Toriyama makes is automatically good. You're claiming that if GT had Toriyama behind it, it would be automatically good, when that's not the case and someone who isn't Toriyama can make just as good a DB fiction as Toriyama.
It just comes across as quite naive and fanboyish. Someone can probably explain it better, but I hope you understand what I mean.
Although I personally disagree with the bolded statement, as I believe to be as good or better one would have to be creating their own series rather than working on somebody else's work.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!
- Kingdom Heartless
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:21 am
- Location: QLD, Australia
- Contact:
Re: GT as Manga
Nah, I'm pretty sure the one I saw was from China.
Yo! Cal's the name. Nice to meet you!
Lover of all that is pure and fun in the worlds of Dragon Ball, Jim Henson and so forth!
3DS Friend Code 1418-7854-8786. I'm always playing Pokemon, so PM me yours for Friend Safari and battling! :D
Lover of all that is pure and fun in the worlds of Dragon Ball, Jim Henson and so forth!
3DS Friend Code 1418-7854-8786. I'm always playing Pokemon, so PM me yours for Friend Safari and battling! :D
- Piccolo Daimao
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:23 am
Re: GT as Manga
Well...OK, then.Saiga wrote:I'm not making that claim and Fox isn't making that claim. Fox is simply stating that generally the Dragon Ball material that isn't created by Toriyama isn't good. That means, generally, the movies, filler etc. Isn't very good. That doesn't mean that Fox is saying anything created by Toriyama is automatically good. It seems you're reading far too much into this.Piccolo Daimao wrote:
Because not every DB-related thing Toriyama makes is automatically good. You're claiming that if GT had Toriyama behind it, it would be automatically good, when that's not the case and someone who isn't Toriyama can make just as good a DB fiction as Toriyama.
It just comes across as quite naive and fanboyish. Someone can probably explain it better, but I hope you understand what I mean.
Although I personally disagree with the bolded statement, as I believe to be as good or better one would have to be creating their own series rather than working on somebody else's work.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Re: GT as Manga
Oh, this one DOES come from China. I wrote that you can enjoy it best if you know french just because this translation happens to be french (and also I've never seen it posted anywhere else so we're down to what we've got).Kingdom Heartless wrote:Nah, I'm pretty sure the one I saw was from China.
Re: GT as Manga
I don't like everything in the manga. But the fillers, movies and especially GT are created only for money, and it's no surprise that in most cases the result is not good.Saiga wrote:I'm not making that claim and Fox isn't making that claim. Fox is simply stating that generally the Dragon Ball material that isn't created by Toriyama isn't good. That means, generally, the movies, filler etc. Isn't very good. That doesn't mean that Fox is saying anything created by Toriyama is automatically good. It seems you're reading far too much into this.
- Eire
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
- Location: The Promised Land
- Contact:
Re: GT as Manga
The problem isn't about money (because everybody works for them), but about lack of the proper development. Expanded Universes tend to result in loads of crap, but if someone actually dedicated to particular series comes with idea to cover unexplored parts of background that can result in pretty enjoyable works. The best example would be Star Wars that thanks to promoted fanboys still stays afloat, giving fans quite decent materials.
Unfortunately it seems that Toei lacked of such people and we have what we see. But I also don't think that Toriyama's involvement in production could change anything- the ideas in GT were actually pretty interesting, but lacked of thoughtful development that isn't his strong point.
Unfortunately it seems that Toei lacked of such people and we have what we see. But I also don't think that Toriyama's involvement in production could change anything- the ideas in GT were actually pretty interesting, but lacked of thoughtful development that isn't his strong point.
Last edited by Eire on Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Per aspera ad astra, man!
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
- Corporate_Nothing
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:41 am
Re: GT as Manga
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/assumptionFox666 wrote:But the fillers, movies and especially GT are created only for money, and it's no surprise that in most cases the result is not good.Saiga wrote:I'm not making that claim and Fox isn't making that claim. Fox is simply stating that generally the Dragon Ball material that isn't created by Toriyama isn't good. That means, generally, the movies, filler etc. Isn't very good. That doesn't mean that Fox is saying anything created by Toriyama is automatically good. It seems you're reading far too much into this.
It's been done countless times before, but...
ImmaDMCA
ImmaDMCA
Re: GT as Manga
No way!
GT had "ideas", but lacked a history. Dragon Ball has never been popular sonely because of battles with villains.Eire wrote:The problem isn't about money (because everybody works for them), but about lack of idea. Expanded Universes tend to result in loads of crap, but if someone actually dedicated to particular series comes with idea to cover unexplored parts of background that can result in pretty enjoyable works. The best example would be Star Wars that thanks to promoted fanboys still stays afloat, giving fans quite decent materials.
Unfortunately it seems that Toei lacked of such people and we have what we see. But I also don't think that Toriyama's involvement in production could change anything- the ideas in GT were actually pretty interesting, but lacked of thoughtful development that isn't his strong point.
- Eire
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
- Location: The Promised Land
- Contact:
Re: GT as Manga
OK, I messed a bit. The first sentence should looks like: The problem isn't about money (because everybody works for them), but about lack of the proper development. Now we can agree 
Per aspera ad astra, man!
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food
- Goten Forever
- Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:28 pm
- Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Re: GT as Manga
I didn't like the films that much at all...Herms wrote:Yeah, Toriyama's involvement in the movies and the TV specials was equally light as what he did for GT, but that didn't stop Broli and Bardock from becoming super-popular.Fox666 wrote:It's not like GT unpopularity is only because Toriyama wasn't involved on it. It is because it is really bad...
I think the best thing to come out of Toei is Bardock.
SON GOTEN FTW
except GT Goten
Especially after he went out with Paresu-chan
except GT Goten
Especially after he went out with Paresu-chan
-
Darkonever
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 5:37 pm
Re: GT as Manga
I have posted in other subject a link to page where are first three volumes of Dragon Ball GT manga.
Link to subject is here.
Link to subject is here.
Re: GT as Manga
You could have created a new topic rather than bump two older ones...
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin







