Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
- Hellspawn28
- Patreon Supporter
- Posts: 15506
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
- Location: Maryland, USA
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
I forgot about the 2008 Jump Special. I view the manga version of it canon since AT seems like that version better.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/
- UpFromTheSkies
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:05 pm
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
For me, the only thing that's cannon is what Toriyama wrote himself or references.
- UpFromTheSkies
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:05 pm
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
If anything seems like a contradiction from Toriyama, it's not really a contradiction, it's a misinterpretation from the readerBasaku wrote:Yeah, basically the safest approach a fan can have right now. Especially in the recent few years with all the new projects coming out that conflict with each other, both from Toei and Toriyama himself lolpenguintruth wrote:Canon: 42 volumes of Akira Toriyama's Dragon Ball manga (yeah, there's some leeway there, but very little)
Not canon: Everything else ever.

Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Personally I'm very flexible with what I consider my personal canon. I'm certainly not one of the people that completely discounts the events of GT or the non-Battle of Gods movies despite any plotholes they may have.
As for the purest form of canon, obviously the manga and Battle of Gods-type works with direct Toriyama involvement come to mind but it's rare that I feel the need to define it that way.
As for the purest form of canon, obviously the manga and Battle of Gods-type works with direct Toriyama involvement come to mind but it's rare that I feel the need to define it that way.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Yeah this pretty much sums up my canon too.UpFromTheSkies wrote:For me, the only thing that's cannon is what Toriyama wrote himself or references.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
The latest Kanzenban edition of the manga and probably Jaco with DB-.
- RandomGuy96
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Manga
Movie 1 [Garlic Jr]
Movie 5 [Cooler]
Movie 7 [Trunks' timeline]
Movie 9 [Bojack]
Movie 13 [Hildegarn]
JSAT special
Jaco
Minus
Some pieces of non-contradictory filler (Ginyus on Kaio's world, Yamcha being a baseball player, etc.)
Most guidebooks (I very rarely ignore any new information from any of them)
I also have the stance of "the characters exist, but the events based around their appearances may not". In other words, in my canon, there really was a space pirate named Chilled, he really was an ancestor of Freeza, etc. But he wasn't killed by Bardock in the main timeline. In the main timeline, Chilled and co killed the purple stalk-eyed people and sold their planet. Similarly, guys like Slug, Tullece, and Broly really do exist, and really did plague the universe, but never encountered the protagonists in the main timeline, so met their ends in some different way.
Movie 1 [Garlic Jr]
Movie 5 [Cooler]
Movie 7 [Trunks' timeline]
Movie 9 [Bojack]
Movie 13 [Hildegarn]
JSAT special
Jaco
Minus
Some pieces of non-contradictory filler (Ginyus on Kaio's world, Yamcha being a baseball player, etc.)
Most guidebooks (I very rarely ignore any new information from any of them)
I also have the stance of "the characters exist, but the events based around their appearances may not". In other words, in my canon, there really was a space pirate named Chilled, he really was an ancestor of Freeza, etc. But he wasn't killed by Bardock in the main timeline. In the main timeline, Chilled and co killed the purple stalk-eyed people and sold their planet. Similarly, guys like Slug, Tullece, and Broly really do exist, and really did plague the universe, but never encountered the protagonists in the main timeline, so met their ends in some different way.
The Monkey King wrote:It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWokeRandomGuy96 wrote:He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Well, I'm simple in that matter :
1 - Is is created by Toriyama?
Yes - It's cannon no matter what. No - Go to question number two.
2 - Does it create major plot holes and/or doesn't fit Toriyamas work?
Yes - It's not cannon. No - It may be considered cannon, but shouldn't be blindly trusted.
1 - Is is created by Toriyama?
Yes - It's cannon no matter what. No - Go to question number two.
2 - Does it create major plot holes and/or doesn't fit Toriyamas work?
Yes - It's not cannon. No - It may be considered cannon, but shouldn't be blindly trusted.
- thatdbzguy
- Banned
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:27 am
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
All of Dragon Ball part one is canon, and everything afterwards is just dreams that Goku has periodically.
Khalid Shahin wrote:Yeah, pretty much sums the show up right there.Dragon Soul Funimation Lyrics wrote:Nothing ever dies; we will rise again!
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20405
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Whatever Toriyama wrote was canon, but I disregard the ending with Uub. In my mind he trains but lives with his family, and visits his friends once a year.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Vegeta sure, not GokuABED wrote:In my mind he trains but lives with his family, and visits his friends once a year.

Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Jaco/DB Minus (only because it's Toriyama's work).
The DB/Z manga.
Movie 13
Yo, Son Goku and Friends Return (anime and manga).
BoG
The DB/Z manga.
Movie 13
Yo, Son Goku and Friends Return (anime and manga).
BoG
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20405
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Vegeta has no friends, and I do think Goku would visit his family often. What is with people's defense of Vegeta? The guy is a monster.Vegeta sure, not Goku
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
The question should be - what's with people's blind adoration of Goku? You've just admitted you make up your own canon to make him even more pristine and perfect lol. Vegeta was never put on this kind of moral pedestal and people are mostly bringing him up to show that Goku is not 100% perfect, holy, and moral oracle the series tries to portray him as. Even a 'monster' like Vegeta can do something better than GokuABED wrote:What is with people's defense of Vegeta? The guy is a monster.
- SSJ Electric Fury
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 3:20 am
- Location: United States
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
Bardock: The Father of Goku, but with Gine being confirmed as the name of Goku's mother
Jaco the Galactic Patrolman (not sure about Goku's armor, though)
Pre-Z Dragon Ball manga, except Tenshinhan's Piccolo Daimao training and fight go as in the anime
Dragon Ball Kai
Trunks: The Story manga
Dragon Ball Z movies five, nine, thirteen, fourteen (BoG), and by extent, the 2008 special
Jaco the Galactic Patrolman (not sure about Goku's armor, though)
Pre-Z Dragon Ball manga, except Tenshinhan's Piccolo Daimao training and fight go as in the anime
Dragon Ball Kai
Trunks: The Story manga
Dragon Ball Z movies five, nine, thirteen, fourteen (BoG), and by extent, the 2008 special
"You can't make up for your mistakes when you're dead." - Irina Akulov, Xenoblade [Chronicles] X
ringworm128 wrote:Spoiler:
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
At the begining sure but at the end of the Cell saga and during the Buu saga he's not even close to what he was.ABED wrote:What is with people's defense of Vegeta? The guy is a monster.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
- ABED
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 20405
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: Skippack, PA
- Contact:
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
He's not absolved of his sins just by his acts at the end of the Buu arc. Remember, he's very much responsible for Buu's resurrection. He killed the tournament spectators. Yes, he changed, but he's still responsible for so much death and tragedy, he couldn't ever make it right.sintzu wrote:At the begining sure but at the end of the Cell saga and during the Buu saga he's not even close to what he was.ABED wrote:What is with people's defense of Vegeta? The guy is a monster.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
The anime up until the Unigame's birthday episode.
That seems like the best ending for me.
That seems like the best ending for me.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.
- Low Tone G
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
But he did! He tried to make everything right when challenged Fat Buu, even he failed afterwards. And also he was who tended to sacrifice himself once again against Kid (Pure) Buu just to earn time for Goku to be a hero again.ABED wrote:He's not absolved of his sins just by his acts at the end of the Buu arc. Remember, he's very much responsible for Buu's resurrection. He killed the tournament spectators. Yes, he changed, but he's still responsible for so much death and tragedy, he couldn't ever make it right.sintzu wrote:At the begining sure but at the end of the Cell saga and during the Buu saga he's not even close to what he was.ABED wrote:What is with people's defense of Vegeta? The guy is a monster.
Last edited by Low Tone G on Thu Apr 24, 2014 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
English is not my first language!
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...
Re: Your personal canon (AGAIN!)
lolUpFromTheSkies wrote: If anything seems like a contradiction from Toriyama, it's not really a contradiction, it's a misinterpretation from the reader
