Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

ImmaDeker
Banned
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by ImmaDeker » Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:11 pm

Low Tone G wrote:I simply don't like him, I better like Tullece.
Tullece is one of the best Z era villains, easily. I'd rank him higher than just about everyone who isn't Fat Buu or Beerus.

User avatar
samuraix123
I Live Here
Posts: 3815
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:22 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by samuraix123 » Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:21 pm

I like Broly in the 1st and 2nd movies but I felt like we didn't need a 3rd movie with him. I have friends that goes crazy about Broly to point of me starting to hate him. lol
The Dragonboxes are like a middle aged woman who still looks good through simply taking good care of her skin and body with maybe a tiny bit of makeup while the Orange Bricks are like a middle aged woman who get's 50 tons of botox, makeup and plastic surgery in order to look younger and as a result looks even worse. ~ ringworm128
Still recording Toonami broadcasts on VHS after all these years!
#1 Paikuhan fan!

User avatar
BlazingFiddlesticks
I Live Here
Posts: 2098
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by BlazingFiddlesticks » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:00 pm

He is every stereotype of the Z-era taken seriously and with gusto. It is his greatest strength and greatest weakness; he's hopelessly ripped in a way that puts even Nappa to shame, the height of his power seems indiscernible, he plays Toriyama's usual shtick of the strongest being the puniest in its logical reverse, he lays down a beating the likes of which we rarely see in the rest of the series, etc. As a concept he's entertaining and something that probably took a bit guts to commit to exploring, and I'm glad Toei did. He really only becomes problematic when he's built up as some sort of end-all be-all of the series, as two sequels and years of Spike games and Dragon Ball Heroes attempts, rather than the stylistic chapter he really is.

But by extension, Paragras was a lot of fun to watch for what little he had. He was really in a unique position, trying to reassert a Saiyan commercial-military operation but not as a cave-dwelling entrepreneur but as the only survivor in a post-Freeza world that actually cared about the idea. That he still feels any kind of moral failing on his part for son's actions despite all that is even odder. Raises the whole question about whether or not Saiyans are really capable of doing something like that themselves or if they just need bubble societies like King Vegeta's (in that Freeza could demand whatever he wanted of them) to develop any sense of culture.
ImmaDeker wrote:
Low Tone G wrote:I simply don't like him, I better like Tullece.
Tullece is one of the best Z era villains, easily. I'd rank him higher than just about everyone who isn't Fat Buu or Beerus.
Now why would that be? He does put on different airs enough to distinguish himself from the Saiyan arc three, but he seems more in line with the more typical villain than Fat Buu and Beerus.
JulieYBM wrote:
Pannaliciour wrote:Reading all the comments and interviews, my conclusion is: nobody knows what the hell is going on.
Just like Dragon Ball since Chapter #4.
son veku wrote:
Metalwario64 wrote:
BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:Kingdom Piccolo
Where is that located?
Canada

User avatar
Gyt Kaliba
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8869
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
Location: Arkansas
Contact:

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Gyt Kaliba » Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:50 pm

I honestly really like Broly. He used to be one of my favorite villains, and...actually, he still might be (though he's definitely slipped quite a bit down the list at least). There's just something really enjoyable about watching the way he just powers through everyone and everything thrown at him in movie 8. Sure, the whole 'crying made him insane', if you take it at that level, is a pretty weak reason for his hatred for Goku, but...I find it hard to get too annoyed with something like that when we're already watching a series where our main hero is named after a carrot.

Movies 10 and 11 are where the character went overboard though. I'd say it was too much of a good thing, but sadly, Broly didn't bring any of what was good about him originally to those other two movies, so...really they're just lackluster in general. The only good things I can say about them are that they both give more minor characters a chance to shine and the location for movie 11 is interesting, but even both of those positives are almost moot - there's no explanation given for why the more major characters are missing in either movie, and the laboratory location was already done (and better) in movie 2.
Hellspawn28 wrote:Movie 10 and 11 should have give us original villains instead then bringing back the same character more then once. Even Metal Coola felt like they were pushing it since he was just a rehash of Mecha Freeza.
And here I thought I was the only one that thought that! Honestly, I think all of the 'sequel' movies for Z, the ones with returning villains, would have been better served by having an original villain instead. Movie 6 could have just used the Big Gete Star as DBZ's answer to Unicron from Transformers. Movie 10 could have been about the monster that terrorized the village (still could have used the dinosaur as a red herring at first though). And movie 11 already had enough going on with the Bio-warriors stuff, just have one of those be super strong without messing with the returned Broly schtick.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7676
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by jjgp1112 » Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:26 pm

Broly was actually one of my favorite characters in the early years of my fandom. I dunno, just seeing a big, hulked up Super Saiyan going out and wrecking shit appealed to me as a kid, plus I'm a wrestling fan. However, I really loathe the way he's been portrayed since Movie 10, and his slew of fanboys certainly don't help.

So I guess the verdict is I think movie 8 Broly is great, but a shallow character otherwise.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

ImmaDeker
Banned
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by ImmaDeker » Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:37 pm

BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:
Now why would that be? He does put on different airs enough to distinguish himself from the Saiyan arc three, but he seems more in line with the more typical villain than Fat Buu and Beerus.
Evil Goku who gains a super mode by eating is the best shit ever.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:23 pm

ImmaDeker wrote:
BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:
Now why would that be? He does put on different airs enough to distinguish himself from the Saiyan arc three, but he seems more in line with the more typical villain than Fat Buu and Beerus.
Evil Goku who gains a super mode by eating is the best shit ever.
That's basically Cell in a nutshell, though. Maybe Super Buu too...
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

ImmaDeker
Banned
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by ImmaDeker » Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:27 am

RandomGuy96 wrote:
ImmaDeker wrote:
BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:
Now why would that be? He does put on different airs enough to distinguish himself from the Saiyan arc three, but he seems more in line with the more typical villain than Fat Buu and Beerus.
Evil Goku who gains a super mode by eating is the best shit ever.
That's basically Cell in a nutshell, though. Maybe Super Buu too...
They eat people, not food, and turn into progressively more boring versions of themselves.

Tullece eats FOOD and gains the power of gods. Especially NOW, he's a surprisingly great idea and a bit before his time.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 2:29 am

They eat people, not food, and turn into progressively more boring versions of themselves.
I wouldn't call Super Buu boring, even in his stronger forms. Cell... well, you got me there. At least it's better then starting out as boring and remaining boring, which Tullece was. Aside from being creepy once or twice (stomping on Goku while shooting the hell out of him + grabbing Gohan and holding his eyes open). He always struck me as one of the most stock villains, right up there with Slug and Bojack.
Tullece eats FOOD and gains the power of gods. Especially NOW, he's a surprisingly great idea and a bit before his time.
Eating food to gain the power of gods? Real men eat gods to gain the power of gods.
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

ImmaDeker
Banned
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by ImmaDeker » Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:00 am

RandomGuy96 wrote: I wouldn't call Super Buu boring,
I would. He's another lean asshole when Fat Buu was way more interesting.
Eating food to gain the power of gods? Real men eat gods to gain the power of gods.
Goku ain't a real man, so Tullece shouldn't be either.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:02 am

I would. He's another lean asshole when Fat Buu was way more interesting.
He's an asshole, but he's an asshole in more varied, intelligent, and creative (not to mention funny) ways than the last two main assholes.
Goku ain't a real man, so Tullece shouldn't be either.
I don't get it. Because of his voice?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

ImmaDeker
Banned
Posts: 251
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by ImmaDeker » Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:04 am

RandomGuy96 wrote: He's an asshole, but he's an asshole in more varied, intelligent, and creative (not to mention funny) ways than the last two main assholes.
Doesn't matter to me when Fat Buu was way better. He was the PERFECT villain to end everything on. The transformations always disappointed me.
I don't get it. Because of his voice?
His voice has nothing to do with it.

Goku's a boy, not a man.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:13 am

Doesn't matter to me when Fat Buu was way better. He was the PERFECT villain to end everything on. The transformations always disappointed me.
Meh, different strokes for different folks then. Super Buu's my favorite villain, though tons-of-fun is up there.

In any case, I'm not sure how Tullece is interesting. Everything about that guy just screamed "stock" to me. He was just evil, without amusing quirks, personality traits, smarts, or a "cool" factor to make up for his lazy design and lack of motivation. A lot of movie villains are like that.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Low Tone G
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Low Tone G » Mon Nov 03, 2014 5:30 am

I do not see why is that fandom around Broly, why want they him to be in the next movie(LOL). He is nothing special, he is a dumb one in the base form(look at his eyes), and a fool destroyer in LSSJ form. Turles, on the other hand, is smart enough. Broly isn't a typical Saiyan regarding his personlity.
English is not my first language!
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...

User avatar
Eire
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:58 pm
Location: The Promised Land
Contact:

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Eire » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:33 am

look at his eyes
And think that he has a terrible headache and no painkiller in sight. And he resisted for better half of the film before he tried to murder those who made it worse. Now he is practically a hero.
Per aspera ad astra, man!

Women belong in the kitchen.
Men belong in the kitchen.
Everyone belongs in the kitchen, the kitchen has food

User avatar
Hellspawn28
Patreon Supporter
Posts: 15502
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:50 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Hellspawn28 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:39 pm

Tullece was a better villain then Broli in my opinion seeing that he was everything that Goku would have been if he was truly evil. Broli could have been great if he was written better.
She/Her
PS5 username: Guyver_Spawn_27
LB Profile: https://letterboxd.com/Hellspawn28/

User avatar
Low Tone G
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Low Tone G » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:45 pm

Broli heavily bores me. I think apart that the movie is good enough, Broly's character and his appearance is very boring. I like movie 8 because of team-work and because of Paragus. And movies 10 and 11 are even more boring, on par with Super Android 13.
English is not my first language!
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...

User avatar
Thanos
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:33 am
Location: South Korea

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Thanos » Mon Nov 03, 2014 6:41 pm

A movie about the guy? Sure, great! Two? Fair enough... why not. Three? Totally unnecessary. Introducing a DBGT-only form for the Z movie-only character 21 years after his original debut? Get outta here... :lol:
Thanos before Thanos was cool.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10367
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:16 pm

Thanos wrote:A movie about the guy? Sure, great! Two? Fair enough... why not. Three? Totally unnecessary. Introducing a DBGT-only form for the Z movie-only character 21 years after his original debut? Get outta here... :lol:
Technically, Bio-Broly wasn't Broly. And in practice, that "Broly" was nothing like the one from M8 and M10. So I don't really see the problem there. The movie could have been "Goten and Trunks vs the Massive Mud Monster from Mars," and hardly anything would have to be changed. So I don't see the point in using Bio-Broly as a knock against the use of the character when it very clearly was a totally different take on said character.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

User avatar
Ashelia
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 3:07 am
Contact:

Re: Broli: A Character Discussion in Fandom Context

Post by Ashelia » Mon Nov 03, 2014 8:38 pm

Broly's movies are basically everything that pains me about the series when it comes to its potential.

The premise of movie 8 starts off great because its about Paragus and Broly being wronged by the royal Saiyan family, it makes perfect sense. Paragus wants revenge and of course that revenge is directed at Vegeta. I'm totally on board even though I have some criticisms but once Broly is introduced suddenly that cliche yet still cool premise is sidelined because now a connection to Goku must be created and that 2 sequel creating connection is "He won't shut up and made me cry as a baby, I didn't like that very much". King Vegeta ordered Broly's death, his father is obsessed with this fact so I'm sure Broly knows about it but that is nothing in Broly's eyes compared to Goku's crying. Baby psychology is one thing but this idea got out of hand :/

I like the uncontrollable crazy Saiyan concept and the design of Broly, I oddly think he's adorable in base form but everything after the reveal is meaningless to me. I don't hate him I'm just disappointed that he and Paragus aren't the fleshed out interesting characters I feel they could've been especially since there is a clear conflict between them. I get kids maybe don't care about that and just wanna see stuff get smashed but he had so much potential in movie 8. 10 and 11 were needless travesties that just further proved why the premise for Broly was so silly.

I don't mind the inclusion of him in media I just wish he was explored more beyond being Super Saiyan Hulk. His fanbase though? I pay them no mind like many other facets of the fandom.

Post Reply