Goku Has "Wall Level Durability at Best" Debunked

Discussion, generally of an in-universe nature, regarding any aspect of the franchise (including movies, spin-offs, etc.) such as: techniques, character relationships, internal back-history, its universe, and more.
User avatar
Polyphase Avatron
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6643
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am

Re: Goku Has "Wall Level Durability at Best" Debunked

Post by Polyphase Avatron » Sat May 30, 2015 9:17 pm

Hitiro wrote:
singsing wrote:It's also ludicrous to think that 40 ton "feat" is anything but an outlier imho.
Even if we assume that it is an outlier just a simple google search shows that a 10,000ft tall mountain would weigh around 8.1718E+17 tons. If we assume a linear strength progression then no character below 100% Freeza in terms of power could ever hope to move a mountain of that magnitude.
Well I mean just break the top off, at the altitude of the door, not topple the entire mountain. Or perhaps push the laboratory through the rock and out the other side of the mountaintop.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147

User avatar
Hitiro
I Live Here
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:43 pm

Re: Goku Has "Wall Level Durability at Best" Debunked

Post by Hitiro » Sat May 30, 2015 9:49 pm

Polyphase Avatron wrote:
Hitiro wrote:
singsing wrote:It's also ludicrous to think that 40 ton "feat" is anything but an outlier imho.
Even if we assume that it is an outlier just a simple google search shows that a 10,000ft tall mountain would weigh around 8.1718E+17 tons. If we assume a linear strength progression then no character below 100% Freeza in terms of power could ever hope to move a mountain of that magnitude.
Well I mean just break the top off, at the altitude of the door, not topple the entire mountain. Or perhaps push the laboratory through the rock and out the other side of the mountaintop.
I mean the top too. Because if the whole mountain is 8E+17 tons then the top of it is still going to be a couple hundred million. Even if you assume there is only 100x100 metres of rock around the lab(which I would assume there is a lot more) then that is 652,400 tons they'd have to shift. Not to mention the lab and everything in it itself. If the metal it's made of, and all of the stuff in it, were anything like Titanium it would way twice as much per cubic centimetres as what rock is.

Post Reply