Not only do the rock songs date faster, but they also weren't actually created for the purpose of complementing Dragon Ball. They make the movies all seem like AMVs. Whereas Faulconer at least fit with the dub dialogue, the rock songs don't even seem to do that. I can enjoy DBZ with Faulconer as its own thing, separate from the original true experience of the show. But I can't ever enjoy the movies with those rock songs.VegettoEX wrote: That's been one of my biggest sticking points with the replacement soundtracks. I'll argue until the cows come home that the Faulconer Productions soundtrack style was already outdated by the time it was in use in the show. Using "real band" vocal rock songs only serves to directly pinpoint the timing of the replacement music, and that's going to age even faster.
To go with how you opened your own post: say what you will about the "dated-ness" of the Kikuchi music, but at least it is when it's from, knows when it's from and what specific style it's trying to be!
And I agree that, despite the subjective dated-ness of Kikuchi's music, it is the show and is representative of the time & context that it was created in. Although I prefer Faulconer, I do so with the acknowledgement that I'm essentially watching a different show with a different tone, different characterizations, and different dialogue. That's why I decided to get into Kai: to get a more accurate Dragon Ball experience.


[/spoiler]







