Goku Black should have been his own character

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Doctor. » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:08 pm

DragonBallFoodie wrote:Not really, it's just Zamasu's soul with Goku's fighting ability, that's all he wanted.
That's not true, it already has been noted that Black has different personality traits to Zamasu and he even said that Goku's body has been influencing his decisions.

He's certainly his own entity at this point. Saying otherwise is like saying future Trunks and kid Trunks are the same character.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by fadeddreams5 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:12 pm

Doctor. wrote:
DragonBallFoodie wrote:Not really, it's just Zamasu's soul with Goku's fighting ability, that's all he wanted.
That's not true, it already has been noted that Black has different personality traits to Zamasu and he even said that Goku's body has been influencing his decisions.

He's certainly his own entity at this point. Saying otherwise is like saying future Trunks and kid Trunks are the same character.
They might as well be in EoZ and GT.

Edit: Never mind. One has blue hair now. I forgot.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
SaiyanZ
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by SaiyanZ » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:19 pm

Goku cares outside of when they aren't in danger. Hence why he decides to show up for a tournament, or when he decides to bring Gohan along to Kame House. Yusuke Urameshi is similar, he loves his friends and family but can risk them for a good fight as we see in the final arc when he decides on a tournament.
ekrolo2 wrote: The problem with this is that Goku has no depth as a character of any description, he's just a fighting junkie and this very simplistic view of the world makes trying to write him as anything close to Black really, really difficult. The closest we've come to an evil Goku who could happen within the parameters of Goku's character was Perfect Cell, a fighting junkie wasn't afraid of killing/torturing people to draw out strong fighters.
He has depth, just nothing relating to the worth of humanity as a whole. He doesn't care about them, so he shouldn't have an opinion. And no, no dark journey that makes him kill people, that would just make him a generic Akuma/Kamui (from Gintama) type character.
Tim Duncan is dope and forever.

My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by ekrolo2 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:24 pm

SaiyanZ wrote:He has depth, just nothing relating to the worth of humanity as a whole. He doesn't care about them, so he shouldn't have an opinion. And no, no dark journey that makes him kill people, that would just make him a generic Akuma/Kamui (from Gintama) type character.
I can't really agree that he has depth, his selfishness is an interesting point amongst Shonen protagonists and makes him somewhat interesting to talk about but he has no depth: he's a fighting junkie, that's basically it and that doesn't really leave much room for someone to give him a dark turn. The only way I can see it kind of working is if Goku's selfishness got everyone killed and he had no way to bullshit his way out of it.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
SaiyanZ
OMG CRAZY REGEN
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:04 pm

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by SaiyanZ » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:31 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:
SaiyanZ wrote:He has depth, just nothing relating to the worth of humanity as a whole. He doesn't care about them, so he shouldn't have an opinion. And no, no dark journey that makes him kill people, that would just make him a generic Akuma/Kamui (from Gintama) type character.
I can't really agree that he has depth, his selfishness is an interesting point amongst Shonen protagonists and makes him somewhat interesting to talk about but he has no depth: he's a fighting junkie, that's basically it and that doesn't really leave much room for someone to give him a dark turn. The only way I can see it kind of working is if Goku's selfishness got everyone killed and he had no way to bullshit his way out of it.
I think him killing without a moral compass, then not killing after training with Kami, and then being able to kill again after defeating Freeza on Namek is something of interest to talk about when it comes to him. I think his laid-back attitude kind of lends itself to him being a character who is "just there". You see so many shonen protagonists who are against killing or don't do it nowadays that its kinda refreshing to see someone who can do it without spouting philosophical bs all the time. Even among old protagonists this is true when you think of Kenshin (minus his past as a Hitokiri I mean) and Vash, etc.
Tim Duncan is dope and forever.

My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ

User avatar
Freeza9000
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 am
Location: Outside of time

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Freeza9000 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:38 pm

SaiyanZ wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:
SaiyanZ wrote:He has depth, just nothing relating to the worth of humanity as a whole. He doesn't care about them, so he shouldn't have an opinion. And no, no dark journey that makes him kill people, that would just make him a generic Akuma/Kamui (from Gintama) type character.
I can't really agree that he has depth, his selfishness is an interesting point amongst Shonen protagonists and makes him somewhat interesting to talk about but he has no depth: he's a fighting junkie, that's basically it and that doesn't really leave much room for someone to give him a dark turn. The only way I can see it kind of working is if Goku's selfishness got everyone killed and he had no way to bullshit his way out of it.
I think him killing without a moral compass, then not killing after training with Kami, and then being able to kill again after defeating Freeza on Namek is something of interest to talk about when it comes to him. I think his laid-back attitude kind of lends itself to him being a character who is "just there". You see so many shonen protagonists who are against killing or don't do it nowadays that its kinda refreshing to see someone who can do it without spouting philosophical bs all the time. Even among old protagonists this is true when you think of Kenshin (minus his past as a Hitokiri I mean) and Vash, etc.
I wholeheartedly agree with you. This is why I like Goku and what makes him stand out as a protagonist.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by ekrolo2 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:45 pm

Saying Goku has a moral compass when he refrains from killing people is pretty doubtful since fighting them again is why he does it. Think about, why spare Piccolo? Besides keeping the Dragon Balls around, he's the only challenge Goku has left in the world so why not let him stick around even if he keeps murdering people! Same thing with Vegeta, then Freeza, he flat out revives Boo as Oob so he can train the kid to fight him at his best again.

There might be some shred of him that likes to give people a second chance but make no mistake, Goku's reasons are primarily selfish in nature and he is consistently written like that from the Vegeta fight onwards and its only really GT that gives him somewhat of a more no-nonsense attitude. He tells Baby he's gonna murder him and he does so, same thing with Super 17 and most of the Shadow Dragons. The only one I'm not positive about is Eise since I haven't watched their Japanese fight in a while.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Doctor. » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:49 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:Saying Goku has a moral compass when he refrains from killing people is pretty doubtful since fighting them again is why he does it. Think about, why spare Piccolo? Besides keeping the Dragon Balls around, he's the only challenge Goku has left in the world so why not let him stick around even if he keeps murdering people! Same thing with Vegeta, then Freeza, he flat out revives Boo as Oob so he can train the kid to fight him at his best again.

There might be some shred of him that likes to give people a second chance but make no mistake, Goku's reasons are primarily selfish in nature and he is consistently written like that from the Vegeta fight onwards and its only really GT that gives him somewhat of a more no-nonsense attitude. He tells Baby he's gonna murder him and he does so, same thing with Super 17 and most of the Shadow Dragons. The only one I'm not positive about is Eise since I haven't watched their Japanese fight in a while.
Why spare the Ginyu Force though? They're weaklings. He expressed no desire in fighting them again. Freeza too. He told Freeza to disappear and never bother him again. He does seem to refrain from killing.

DragonBallFoodie
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 5:12 pm
Location: Zambia, Southern Africa

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by DragonBallFoodie » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:06 pm

ekrolo2 wrote: I can't really agree that he has depth, his selfishness is an interesting point amongst Shonen protagonists and makes him somewhat interesting to talk about but he has no depth: he's a fighting junkie, that's basically it and that doesn't really leave much room for someone to give him a dark turn. The only way I can see it kind of working is if Goku's selfishness got everyone killed and he had no way to bullshit his way out of it.
Childishness is a better term to put it. He was raised in the wilderness and had brief parental guidance, so he knows the basics of right from wrong but he has a very simple look on the world and he won't give up his fighting addiction.

The Sean Schemmel Goku is more a naive country boy, like a slightly less bright Clark Kent.


Black Goku is distinctly smarter and aloof than normal Goku, which is due to Zamasu's intellect in place. But I think Goku would normally have gotten there if he'd gone bad, since he keeps beating up people stronger than him.
"Don't take pleasure in destruction!" / "I will not let you destroy my world!"
A true hero goes beyond not the limits of power, but the limits that divide countries and people.

User avatar
ekrolo2
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7865
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:27 am
Location: Split, Croatia

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by ekrolo2 » Sun Oct 23, 2016 6:24 pm

Doctor. wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:Saying Goku has a moral compass when he refrains from killing people is pretty doubtful since fighting them again is why he does it. Think about, why spare Piccolo? Besides keeping the Dragon Balls around, he's the only challenge Goku has left in the world so why not let him stick around even if he keeps murdering people! Same thing with Vegeta, then Freeza, he flat out revives Boo as Oob so he can train the kid to fight him at his best again.

There might be some shred of him that likes to give people a second chance but make no mistake, Goku's reasons are primarily selfish in nature and he is consistently written like that from the Vegeta fight onwards and its only really GT that gives him somewhat of a more no-nonsense attitude. He tells Baby he's gonna murder him and he does so, same thing with Super 17 and most of the Shadow Dragons. The only one I'm not positive about is Eise since I haven't watched their Japanese fight in a while.
Why spare the Ginyu Force though? They're weaklings. He expressed no desire in fighting them again. Freeza too. He told Freeza to disappear and never bother him again. He does seem to refrain from killing.
Touche.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.

How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):

User avatar
DragonHermit
Regular
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2015 12:07 am

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by DragonHermit » Sun Oct 23, 2016 7:49 pm

I still have a theory that a Towa-type character planted the evil thoughts in Zamasu/Black's head, that will lead to the next arc.

Maybe that Universe 12 guy who first time travelled is somehow involved.

User avatar
Freeza9000
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 am
Location: Outside of time

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Freeza9000 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:21 pm

DragonHermit wrote:Maybe that Universe 12 guy who first time travelled is somehow involved.
That was manga only.

User avatar
jjgp1112
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 7809
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm
Location: Crooklyn

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by jjgp1112 » Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:41 pm

ekrolo2 wrote:Saying Goku has a moral compass when he refrains from killing people is pretty doubtful since fighting them again is why he does it. Think about, why spare Piccolo? Besides keeping the Dragon Balls around, he's the only challenge Goku has left in the world so why not let him stick around even if he keeps murdering people! Same thing with Vegeta, then Freeza, he flat out revives Boo as Oob so he can train the kid to fight him at his best again.

There might be some shred of him that likes to give people a second chance but make no mistake, Goku's reasons are primarily selfish in nature and he is consistently written like that from the Vegeta fight onwards and its only really GT that gives him somewhat of a more no-nonsense attitude. He tells Baby he's gonna murder him and he does so, same thing with Super 17 and most of the Shadow Dragons. The only one I'm not positive about is Eise since I haven't watched their Japanese fight in a while.
This is a rather extreme interpretation. Not only did Goku spare Frieza and Vegeta, he also spared Nappa and the Ginyu Force members after applying lethal, but not fatal, force. He's always made it clear he doesn't respect people who beat up on those who are defenseless or weaker than him, which is why he always urged henchmen to just surrender rather than press the issue.
Yamcha: Do you remember the spell to release him - do you know all the words?
Bulma: Of course! I'm not gonna pull a Frieza and screw it up!
Master Roshi: Bulma, I think Frieza failed because he wore too many clothes!
Cold World (Fanfic)
"It ain't never too late to stop bein' a bitch." - Chad Lamont Butler

User avatar
Yomi
Regular
Posts: 616
Joined: Sun May 29, 2016 8:45 am

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Yomi » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:54 pm

DragonHermit wrote:I still have a theory that a Towa-type character planted the evil thoughts in Zamasu/Black's head, that will lead to the next arc.

Maybe that Universe 12 guy who first time travelled is somehow involved.
I think that would be lame, since there was all this talk about gods ignoring their subjects and allowing evil. I just hope Zamasu finds the answer to peace. He probably won't. Which will be disappointing. Maybe he'll find a friend in Zeno.
:clap:

User avatar
KinguKurimuzon
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 4:01 pm
Location: The End of Time

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by KinguKurimuzon » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:06 am

It's funny, when the Universe 6 tournament was still going on, I had a theory that the next saga would involve an evil Goku, only he'd be the Goku from Universe 6. I assumed that since U6 is supposed to be a standard mirror universe (at least in the manga), U6 Goku would've come to earth to save the earth from getting blown the fuck up like how it ended up, only to hit his head and be raised by an evil Grandpa Gohan to be cruel and destructive. I've been enjoying Zamasu, but I still wish my theory was more than just half-right.
"Are you trying to impress me with your transformation sequence?" - Mashymre Cello

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:25 am

DragonHermit wrote:I still have a theory that a Towa-type character planted the evil thoughts in Zamasu/Black's head, that will lead to the next arc.

Maybe that Universe 12 guy who first time travelled is somehow involved.
We have already seen why Zamasu has distaste for non-gods first-hand, it makes sense all on its own. Adding magic into the mix would be beating a dead horse.
Retired.

User avatar
Metalwario64
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6293
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:02 am
Location: Namek

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Metalwario64 » Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:14 am

jjgp1112 wrote:
ekrolo2 wrote:Saying Goku has a moral compass when he refrains from killing people is pretty doubtful since fighting them again is why he does it. Think about, why spare Piccolo? Besides keeping the Dragon Balls around, he's the only challenge Goku has left in the world so why not let him stick around even if he keeps murdering people! Same thing with Vegeta, then Freeza, he flat out revives Boo as Oob so he can train the kid to fight him at his best again.

There might be some shred of him that likes to give people a second chance but make no mistake, Goku's reasons are primarily selfish in nature and he is consistently written like that from the Vegeta fight onwards and its only really GT that gives him somewhat of a more no-nonsense attitude. He tells Baby he's gonna murder him and he does so, same thing with Super 17 and most of the Shadow Dragons. The only one I'm not positive about is Eise since I haven't watched their Japanese fight in a while.
This is a rather extreme interpretation. Not only did Goku spare Frieza and Vegeta, he also spared Nappa and the Ginyu Force members after applying lethal, but not fatal, force. He's always made it clear he doesn't respect people who beat up on those who are defenseless or weaker than him, which is why he always urged henchmen to just surrender rather than press the issue.
Exactly. Even in the Japanese version, Goku does many dangerous, selfish things, but he's not the 100% self worshiping guy who only thinks of himself that many fans these days make him out to be (which, to me, is just as wrong as the dub's old superhero characterization, just swung in the opposite direction).
"Kenshi is sitting down right now drawing his mutated spaghetti monsters thinking he's the shit..."--Neptune Kai
"90% of you here don't even know what you're talking about (there are a few that do). But the things you say about these releases are nonsense and just plain dumb. Like you Metalwario64"--final_flash

User avatar
OLKv3
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 12:39 pm

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by OLKv3 » Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:35 am

People don't realize that Cell was pretty much evil Goku

User avatar
Jinzoningen MULE
I Live Here
Posts: 4405
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
Location: Salt Mines

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Jinzoningen MULE » Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:50 am

OLKv3 wrote:People don't realize that Cell was pretty much evil Goku
He wasn't really, his mannerisms and personality didn't favor Goku. The only resemblance is their love of battle and self-improvement. Even though he's not an evil Goku, I am willing to concede that he's pretty much the equivalent of an OP Saiyan.
Retired.

User avatar
Lionel
I Live Here
Posts: 2398
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2015 2:54 am

Re: Black Goku should have been his own character

Post by Lionel » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:26 pm

This may have been possible if Goku's Saiyan memories had not been erased from his mind. A philosophically complex or introspective Goku does not adequately mesh well together. I do agree more could have been achieved to properly differentiate Black from Future Zamasu. Some moral ambivalence over the severity of their methods coupled with more of a grief-stricken but suppressed demeanour around Black over the death of Gowasu could help offer a provocative contrast between the two partners. The lack of impetus or exacerbation from exposure to Goku in the future would have helped to mollify his rage.

Post Reply