"Explain why DBZ is bad."

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:23 pm

Goku-wank is really annoying though. Like when Tenshinhan lost to Drum only for Goku to beat him in one hit; stuff like that used to put me off.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Saiga » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:27 pm

Although I agree that Goku's not much better than anyone else, I'd say only his final Zenkai was bullshit. It's got nothing to do with his training, him being proactive, or anything like that. It's just a Zenkai. No attitude justifies being handed something like that for free.

For the Super God Water, I'd say it's fair. Sort of foreshadowed, and one of the smallest dormant power upgrades we ever actually see. And it seems like he survived that because he was already strong from his training.

His gravity training is a little extreme, because it takes place over the course of one week, but he was combining extreme gravity training with Zenkais and in the process burned through several Senzu which would cost them later. So I think that's fair.

@Kid Buu Surprisingly, I always actually liked that. I dislike him doing the same thing to Mummy, but that was pointless, while here it seems to have a lot more point since immediately prior to that he'd be in the same situation Tenshinhan was.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:30 pm

I just think that battle with Freeza on Namek is poorly executed in terms of power level. Jumping from half a million to allegedly 120 million; the hell? Not to mention the battle just seemed pointless until Freeza's second match with Vegeta begun.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:31 pm

No the math doesn't make sense. If being a few power level points apart makes all the difference, being several thousand times stronger should mean the one with the bigger number has no trouble with the weaker opponent.

Mr. Magic water as you call him trains harder than just about anyone in the show. About the only one who arguably trains harder is Vegeta.
Actually, it does. What are you talking about? When has someone several thousands times stronger than someone else had trouble with them? If you're talking about actual points (as in, Goku was 24,000 and Vegeta was 18,000, so Goku should have killed him in one hit), then that's the wrong way to go about it. It comes to ratios and percentages; 240,000 vs 180,000 has the same gap as 24,000 vs 18,000.

Vegeta trains harder. So does Tenshinhan, who literally does nothing in his free time except farm and train. Piccolo is in the same boat. It didn't help any of them avoid being trash to Goku after his random, end of arc power up (magic water, absurd zenkai, improved ROSAT training).
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:33 pm

Freeza was at least over twenty times Goku's strength in the first half of that fight, and after the Kaioken x20 part he was angrily attacking Goku who was already weakened. Yet hes not bursting into a million pieces or anything.
Last edited by Kid Buu on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:35 pm

Kid Buu wrote:Freeza was at least over twenty times Goku's strength in the first half of that fight, and during the Genki Dama part he was angrily attacking Goku who was already weakened. Yet hes not bursting into a million pieces or anything.
Given his personality, I doubt he was going full force on Goku there.
Ehhhh... we`ll hes Goku though... the story was already set up like that from Dragonball. He has the protagonist-Boost. Its like when Yugi always gets the right card at his 100Lp cap.
What's all of this "Goku is the protagonist of Z" stuff? He's really not.

Saiyan Saga: Right after Gohan is introduced, Goku is killed off and the arc starts focusing on Gohan's development. Gohan is the one who ends up dealing the final blow to Vegeta (after Goku fails miserably on his own), and has much more screen time than Goku.

Freeza Saga: The majority of the Namek arc focuses on Gohan, Vegeta, and Krillin, while Goku just swoops in twice to beat the bad guy. The first time he does this, he screws up and has to have Gohan, Krillin, and Vegeta save him, and the second time, he ALSO screws up, and Freeza ends up being finally defeated by Trunks, not him.

Cell Saga: He doesn't do anything when King Cold shows up, Trunks has to take care of that. When the androids finally arrive, he's easily defeated by the absolute weakest villain in the entire arc, and has to get saved by Vegeta. He's out of commission for the majority of the arc, until the very end... where he gets toyed with and killed by Cell, leaving Gohan to save the day.

Buu Saga: he shows up briefly at the beginning of the arc, which had until then been focusing on Gohan. He screws up everything AGAIN, leaving Gohan, Goten, Trunks, and Piccolo to clean up the mess. The only reason Gohan didn't kill Buu the same way he killed Cell was because Toriyama decided at the last minute to shove Goku back into the spot light. Even then, you could say that Vegeta was the real hero of the final battle, not Goku.
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by ABED » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:37 pm

It really didn't. Goku just randomly gets more from the same power-ups than anyone else (e.g. his zenkai was absurdly stronger than anyone else's for no reason, he easily masters kaio-ken x20 when the god who invented it + Piccolo couldn't even master x2) because he's ostensibly the protagonist. Gohan never got fifty times stronger just from getting angry once.
It was established from the word "go" that Goku was a wunderkind. Goku didn't easily master Kaio-ken x20. He had to train under intense gravity for several days and got to x10. He used x20 as an emergency measure and used up most of the energy he had left. Goku is a better fighter than Piccolo, that was well established, and spent longer on Kaio's planet.
Goku-wank is really annoying though. Like when Tenshinhan lost to Drum only for Goku to beat him in one hit; stuff like that used to put me off.
I don't think it's "wank". There's an argument to be made for Goku being the one to beat him easily or Tenshinhan.
He trained for one week. How does that justify him suddenly spiking in power, when he had not gotten such absurd gains at any other time in the series? It's pretty much just here where he gets over ten times stronger in one week. Vegeta, who could kick his ass without kaio-ken back on Earth, now doesn't even possess a third of Goku's strength thanks to his bullshit week in the gravity chamber.
It's 100x gravity. Gravity training speeds up gains, and he used several senzu to come back from injuries.
How do you "earn" rage?
It was earned storywise. Super Saiyan was well set up narratively, and Goku lost his best friend. We knew what Kuririn meant to him so his grief didn't seem out of place, whereas Gohan's seemed out of place for 16's "death".
He never got his power drawn out to the limit. He just got some of it unlocked, in much the same way Goku did. Also, logically his dormant power would grow proportionally with his regular power as he trained (which he does in the saiyan arc, android arc, and Cell Saga). The only one you could argue was meant to be final was the Ultimate power up from the god of gods that made him several times stronger than Goku- and that was more of a transformation rather than a straight unlock in the vein of Guru's power up or the god water. In other words, more like randomly becoming a Super Saiyan than randomly getting a x33 zenkai.
Grand Elder awakens sleeping power, the idea that he doesn't awaken it all is basically absurd. I don't see how his dormant power would grow proportionally. That's never stated. And you play fast and loose with the word "randomly". Super Saiyan wasn't random, it was built up and established well before.
Vegeta trains harder. So does Tenshinhan, who literally does nothing in his free time except farm and train. Piccolo is in the same boat. It didn't help any of them avoid being trash to Goku after his random, end of arc power up (magic water, absurd zenkai, improved ROSAT training).
Goku doesn't do anything but train either. How much of Tenshinhan's training do we see? Was there anything that compares to Goku's level of training? It's also not how hard you train, it's how smart you train. Vegeta did the same RST training, but Goku was smarter than him in how he went about it. For one, he made use of his partner, plus he made Super Saiyan his natural state.
It comes to ratios and percentages;
Why? Why does that make more sense than absolutes? Goku had an inordinately hard time against Nappa. Yes, I know, Nappa didn't land a punch, but Goku was twice as strong, and that big a gap would've meant a one hit KO without the Kaio-ken. This is why I don't like power levels. It's an attempt to provide an objective scale but it doesn't make sense when you scrutinize it.
Last edited by ABED on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:41 pm

Insertclevername wrote:I don't know if I can really get behind that. Why should other characters be criticized for their power ups but not Gokuu? Even if he is the protagonist, he still inhabits the same laws of nature everyone else does and should therefor be under the same level of scrutiny.
I don`t agree with that ethic either and give it no excuse to be the inherent advantage if it becomes as obvious as Ultimate Gohan`s... but I only let it slide with (Z) Goku because it isnt as bad as a debuting character who discredits everyone else just because they`re the new guy. Thats much harder to swallow. At the very least Goku works for what he gets before the protag-shield kicks in. Its not as if he really gets anything because hes the lead, most of his advantages came from him just having the most efficient and balanced training methods: and he explains this.
Kid Buu wrote:I just think that battle with Freeza on Namek is poorly executed in terms of power level. Jumping from half a million to allegedly 120 million; the hell?
Its still in debate for me wether Freeza was actually stronger than Goku was entirely anyway, even as a SSJ. I think he was until the Spirit Bomb weakened him and his 100% power`s instability from it was what gave Goku the advantage. 5th Form Freeza would stomp SSJ Namek Goku.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:46 pm

It was established from the word "go" that Goku was a wunderkind. Goku didn't easily master Kaio-ken x20. He had to train under intense gravity for several days and got to x10. He used x20 as an emergency measure and used up most of the energy he had left. Goku is a better fighter than Piccolo, that was well established, and spent longer on Kaio's planet.
So him being a wunderkind justifies him mastering a technique that the god who invented it couldn't. In just a year. Then improving it from x4 to x20 in one week. And this is better than Gohan's rage boosts because...?
It's 100x gravity. Gravity training speeds up gains, and he used several senzu to come back from injuries.
If that's the case, then why did training for three years in much more intensive gravity not even making Vegeta five times stronger, when it made Goku 10 times stronger in one week?
It was earned storywise. Super Saiyan was well set up narratively, and Goku lost his best friend. We knew what Kuririn meant to him so his grief didn't seem out of place, whereas Gohan's seemed out of place for 16's "death".
I believe that Vegeta and Freeza referenced it a few times. That's pretty much it; it being mentioned does not justify Goku being the one to get it just from getting angry once.

The rage at 16's death was out of place. He should've been more angry about his friends and family being beaten to death.
Grand Elder awakens sleeping power, the idea that he doesn't awaken it all is basically absurd.
Insult me all you want, that's the canon.
I don't see how his dormant power would grow proportionally. That's never stated.
Why wouldn't it? We know from the guidebooks that all saiyans have a a proportional amount of dormant power, including Goku. It's 400 times more than their base power. Gohan, as a half saiyan, was unique just because his was proportionally more than even that.
And you play fast and loose with the word "randomly". Super Saiyan wasn't random, it was built up and established well before.
Gohan's dormant power wasn't?
Why? Why does that make more sense than absolutes? Goku had an inordinately hard time against Nappa. Yes, I know, Nappa didn't land a punch, but Goku was twice as strong, and that big a gap would've meant a one hit KO without the Kaio-ken. This is why I don't like power levels. It's an attempt to provide an objective scale but it doesn't make sense when you scrutinize it.
There's nothing complex here; Nappa was much weaker than Goku, so Goku was able to easily crush him while Nappa couldn't lay a finger on Goku in turn. Him not being able to one-shot Nappa is down to Nappa being seven feet of pure muscle on top of his high ki level (physical attributes do seem to matter even when ki is factored, given that even a Goku who couldn't use ki attacks in DB was able to easily beat those who could), and also because Goku never real used a "kill shot".

It makes much more sense than absolutes because of what the guidebooks tell us. And also because Vegeta didn't explode upon being lightly tapped by kaio-ken x3 Goku.
Its still in debate for me wether Freeza was actually stronger than Goku was entirely anyway, even as a SSJ. I think he was until the Spirit Bomb weakened him and his 100% power`s instability from it was what gave Goku the advantage. 5th Form Freeza would stomp SSJ Namek Goku.
The guidebooks give 100% Freeza's level as 120 million and SS Goku's as 150 million, so Goku was quite a bit stronger than Freeza. That's his absolute max power by the way, as stated by Freeza himself. From you referencing filler and apparently not knowing it wasn't in the manga, I'm gonna guess you're going by the anime here?
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by ABED » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:49 pm

One of the things I like about Dragon Ball in general is its main character. He's goofy, naïve, cute, but driven. He's not book smart but he's very smart in his field of interest. He constantly works to better himself.
Insult me all you want
I didn't insult you, and it's not canon, that's your interpretation.
Why wouldn't it? We know from the guidebooks that all saiyans have a a proportional amount of dormant power, including Goku. It's 400 times more than their base power. Gohan, as a half saiyan, was unique just because his was proportionally more than even that.
I don't count the guidebooks, and again with the math... If it's not in the show/manga, I don't count it.
Last edited by ABED on Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:51 pm

I didn't insult you, and it's not canon, that's your interpretation.
You said that my ideas were "absurd", and it is obviously canon that Guru's unlock didn't draw out all of Gohan's dormant power.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:52 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote: Tenshinhan, who literally does nothing in his free time except farm and train. Piccolo is in the same boat. It didn't help any of them avoid being trash to Goku after his random, end of arc power up (magic water, absurd zenkai, improved ROSAT training).
Tien shown the most actual martial arts skill among any character in the series besides Piccolo himself but even arguably more in raw technique... yet thats all thrown away because Nappa is just stronger... he was underpowered if anything.

Piccolo`s just handicapped because he has no natural inner-boosting powers.... and was terribly underpowered by the Buu saga. That is what pissed me off. By that saga his anti-Saiyan gimmick was done.

Tien suffers the same thing. Akira never bothers to give him or piccolo any new supernatural powers that would compensate for their lack of Saiyan Zenkai`s and SSJ. Thats where DBZ goes wrong. Way too much Saiyan worship.

Its a shame because Both Tien and Piccolo are peak-expert fighters and peak-super baseline racial strength but are just tossed away in favour of 2 obnoxiously unfunny kids who get SSJ powers by sheer gifts. They skip the whole tail fiasco and dont mature through it at all spoiled with power over 120 million like its nothing.
Last edited by SingleFringe&Sparks on Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:53 pm

To be fair Goku was basically involved with every big bad's defeat. The only exception are the first two arc, because he was the final villain of those arcs.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Draken
Banned
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:01 am

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Draken » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:55 pm

Kid Buu wrote:To be fair Goku was basically involved with every big bad's defeat. The only exception are the first two arc, because he was the final villain of those arcs.
Goku was the final villain of the first two arcs?

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:56 pm

Draken wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:To be fair Goku was basically involved with every big bad's defeat. The only exception are the first two arc, because he was the final villain of those arcs.
Goku was the final villain of the first two arcs?
He turned into a big ape and tried to kill everyone but lost to Yamcha & Puar the first time, then Jackie Chun the second time.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:58 pm

Kid Buu wrote:To be fair Goku was basically involved with every big bad's defeat. The only exception are the first two arc, because he was the final villain of those arcs.
But so was Gohan.

-Landed the final blow on Vegeta.
-Helped distract Freeza while Goku healed.
-Killed Cell.
-The majority of the Genki Dama's power was his.

Also, Goku never directly defeated any of the main villains in Z. Not really.

-Vegeta: defeated by Krillin, Gohan, and Yajirobe. Killed by Freeza and Buu.
-Freeza: killed by Trunks.
-Cell: killed by Gohan.
-Buu: destroyed by a Genki Dama, using Vegeta's plan and power that wasn't his.
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:01 pm, edited 5 times in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Draken
Banned
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:01 am

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Draken » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:58 pm

Kid Buu wrote:
Draken wrote:
Kid Buu wrote:To be fair Goku was basically involved with every big bad's defeat. The only exception are the first two arc, because he was the final villain of those arcs.
Goku was the final villain of the first two arcs?
He turned into a big ape and tried to kill everyone but lost to Yamcha & Puar the first time, then Jackie Chun the second time.
Pretty sure the villain of the first arc was Pilaf and gang, and not sure how Goku was the villain against Roshi.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by ABED » Mon Jan 06, 2014 10:59 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:
I didn't insult you, and it's not canon, that's your interpretation.
You said that my ideas were "absurd", and it is obviously canon that Guru's unlock didn't draw out all of Gohan's dormant power.
It wasn't a personal attack. I think it's ridiculous that it doesn't draw out all of Gohan's dormant power. That's not what is implied when you read that scene. He doesn't say he can awaken "some" sleeping power, he just says sleeping power.
I think Goku`s more `go-with-the-flow`nature is why he gets better results.
That's one way to put it, but I would put it as Goku knows his optimal training methods after years of experience. He knows when to push himself and when to give his body a rest. Muten Roshi taught him and Kuririn about the value of rest. Plus, Goku doesn't just train hard, he trains smart. It's like real life. You can work hard all you want but it's working smart that gives you results.

My beef with the writing in the later arcs is that the other characters aren't given enough to do. Okay, the Saiyans are the strongest but even in other shows where the leader stops the big bad, the supporting characters get something valuable to do.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4222
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:00 pm

Oolong had already stopped Pilaf by the time Oozaru Goku attacked. And how is Oozaru Goku not a villain? He was attacking innocent people and trying to hurt them.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Kamiccolo9
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:32 pm
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: "Explain why DBZ is bad."

Post by Kamiccolo9 » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:00 pm

Draken wrote: Pretty sure the villain of the first arc was Pilaf and gang, and not sure how Goku was the villain against Roshi.
Well, both times Goku did go crazy and almost kill everyone. I can see where he's coming from.
Champion of the 1st Kanzenshuu Short Story Tenkaichi Budokai
Kamiccolo9's Kompendium of Short Stories
Cipher wrote:If Vegeta does not kill Gohan, I will stop illegally streaming the series.
Malik_DBNA wrote:
Scarz wrote:Malik, stop. People are asking me for lewd art of possessed Bra (with Vegeta).
"Achievement Unlocked: Rule 34"

Post Reply