You know, this topic does come up quite a bit, and for some reason, both sides get really passionate about it. I can understand fans of Yamucha being passionate because, well, we like him and don't appreciate the fact that his character was mangled so horrendously in later parts of the series. Don't really get why people who don't like him are so passionate about the subject, but, eh, whatever. But it is so passionate that nothing ever really gets accomplished. So I'm not even going to bother to try and catch up on all the walls of quotes that have transpired while I was at work.RandomGuy96 wrote:2. Don't know a lot about that
However, I do have to say that this quote says a lot. While you obviously don't like Yamucha (and that's okay; there are a lot of points in the story where I don't like Vegeta, for example), it seems you are basing your opinions of him on an incomplete knowledge of him. You seem to know beginning of DB and DBZ with very little in between. And, honestly, in the span you seem to be missing... he's nothing but the dogged nice guy. He's given moments where he's responsible, generous, proactive, self-sacrificing, self-motivated, the voice of reason, the leader of the entire group. To be honest, he becomes more than a little bland (in my web series, I compare him to Fred from Scooby-Doo if that tells you anything), but he's a genuinely good person. But all you seem to see is the guy who was once a villain (like everyone else) who later gets blown up. And I think that's where our disconnect is coming from. If you did "know a lot about that" you might be able to understand how it seems so insultingly out of character to suddenly and out of nowhere make him a cheater for the sole purpose of pushing a Blooma/Vegeta pairing.
I assume you're having a bit of fun here, and that's cool, but it does make it harder to take your argument seriously when you're so over the top in pushing him down. Most of these are so out of context it makes you sound like a politician mudslinging an opponent.Real Top 5 Great Accomplishments:
1. Fought a starving child to a draw
2. Beat up a little girl
3. Got killed by a Saibaman (hey, at least the Saibaman died too)
4. Punched a dog
5. Presuambly greatly weakened Buu after being consumed, giving Gohan and Gotenks a chance
1. Yeah, he's a thief. That's bad. Almost immediately gave up that lifestyle after meeting Goku. Different from other characters how? I actually had to re-read your statements about "beating up starving children" because the context was so lacking and skewed I honestly didn't know what you were talking about at first. It makes it sound like he ran into an orphanage and started smacking children in the lunch line. All he wanted was to steal their valuables. Again, bad. It only became a fight when Goku resisted. Not to defend it. Still bad, but the context does make it different. Also, the starving thing? Very much a skewed statement. The fact that he was hungry at the time is totally incidental and doesn't make Yamucha any better or worse for fighting him at that time.
2. Again, that sounds really bad when you don't put any context in it. But apparently you forget that he didn't initiate that fight. He was just standing there minding his own business when crazy girl shoots a freakin' laser beam at him, and he defended himself by subduing her. Certainly quite a bit different from simply "beating up a little girl."
3. Yeah, he was. And while that's the moment people use to make fun of him, that really IS a defining moment for him. That was the moment he put his own life on the line to protect Kuririn. Maybe it was necessary, maybe it wasn't. Maybe if Yamucha had gone first, before Vegeta made an example out of one of the Saibaimen, that one wouldn't have pulled out a desperation move like that. We'll never know. But Yamucha's fight was pretty impressive, so much so that Piccolo had to use it as an example to teach Gohan how to detect extremely fast fighters. So, yeah. He was incredibly selfless and fought impressively.
4. Um... I have a feeling your attempt to remove context to make him look worse than he actually is is obscuring this, but I honestly have no idea what you're talking about here.
5. And that's just being snarky, so I can't add anything to it.



