sintzu wrote:What are you talking about ?
There's not much that can be discussed with someone who thinks everything Super does is perfect.
So you don't have an opinion on it, you just agree with whatever it does.
We're over 50 episodes in and I'm still waiting for it to be coherent and find its identity.
Blindly following what a company does regardless of you agreeing with it or not isn't much of an opinion.
I'm talking about you using "fanboy" as an insult instead of coming up with a proper argument, although that's par for the course with you. If you're still waiting is because you're not paying enough attention, which shows when all you do is complain and make stuff up. It's time to accept F was factually a successful movie even if it didn't live up to your ideas for it and that Super, while having issues, is successful as well. You don't need to like Toriyama's plot but using cop-out reasons like "oh, Toei/Toriyama was afraid to write x" is ridiculous and makes people think you're only posting out of spite instead of having a well-thought-out argument.
So, I don't have an opinion or I have one and it's just not much of an opinion? How does that work? Again, you're making stuff up and you don't get to define what is an opinion or not. I never stated what you said I did and I'd appreciate if you had proof to back your claims up. By this point, it just looks like you're getting defensive because someone dares not think Super is bad.
sintzu wrote:Instead of Whis rewinding time they could've had earth be the reason for doing the tournament so whoever won would get their earth back and instead of coming up with a Freeza clone for U6, Vados could've brought Freeza along after finding him in space.
In terms of Vegeta, Goku could've grabbed him before the planet exploded.
I understand why they didn't do this cause planning 5 minutes ahead would require time that could be used to count merchandise $$$ instead.
Toriyama wrote the movie, not "they" and you do realize F was supposed to be a standalone movie, right? There was no follow up at that time so what you are suggesting wouldn't be in anyone's mind. But ok, let's ignore it just like you do. So, they didn't have time to plan stuff ahead because they had to count money, right? Well, if the shareholders had money to count in the first place, it means the franchise was in a good place and that's why F got made. Surely, it would serve no one's interest if the movie was half-assed, right? Going by the box office numbers it did great and, most likely, was the reason Super got greenlit. The same Super that retold the two previous movies but, although making sense in order to have a coherent story, would they spend half an year on it had they not been received well? Why isn't Super a GT sequel?
If you don't like something, admit it. Don't come up with poor excuses like saying Toei/Toriyama has a secret agenda to hate on characters or is afraid to go "serious". There's no proof for that, you can't back it up, that's not a proper argument and that's why you find it hard to properly discuss about it.