You can't say that wasn't implied in your post.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:51 pm Again I never claimed only Funi would've grabbed it, just that it likely would've taken much longer to have been dubbed.
But fair enough.
However, I would contest that it taking longer wouldn't have been a bad thing. After all, Funi dubbed it pretty slowly in '96-'97, took '98 and most of '99 off... Really it mostly was happening late '99 until early '05. (Early '04, if you exclude GT)
And if some other company had picked it up, then with all the other anime successes going in in '98, '99, '00, and earlier... Someone would DEFINITELY have picked it up by '01.
So... A. I don't see why it taking longer would be so bad.
And B. It wouldn't even have taken that much longer.
Except Dragon Ball came to TV about the same time as Sailor Moon, Pokémon, Digimon, Yu-Gi-Oh, and other things in the late '90s/early '00s that took America by storm. And DBZ was the only one Funimation did that hit big.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm I strongly disagree that i'm "giving them too much credit", sure there were a few somewhat succesful films, but anime was still overall seen as pretty niche, especially in the realm of TV, so by all means hate them and hold a grudge against them for their dubs all you want(even though it seems pretty pointless nowadays and there are far more productive things you could be doing with your time instead but I digress
), does not make them any less influential, and it's not just me saying that, it's people FAR smarter and more well-versed then you and I:https://www.forbes.com/sites/bruceroger ... b24c0966c1
Unlikely.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm if Funimation didn't exist it likely would've taken a hell of a lot longer for it to have been dubbed in the U.S..
Even if it had taken until the late '90s/early '00s, that's only three or four years later than Funi brought it over, at which point, Pokémon, Digimon, Sailor Moon, et al. had hit big, and companies like Saban, 4Kids, etc. would have been grasping to get the next big thing, and with Dragon Ball being so big in Japan and Europe, we'd have got it then.
I don't think that's as bad as many people say. 4Kids would have at least given us the full original run, with a tone similar to the original, and while death would probably have been censored similar to how it was in Yu-Gi-Oh etc., we already got that with the Saban and edited Funi dubs on TV, with the HFIL stuff, which was pretty well justified in the show by the existence of its own afterlife.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm In that case the most likely scenario would've been 4Kids getting their hands on it(which as CureDragon pointed out means the very likely scenario where we either don't get subbed episodes at all or they only get a few token DVD releases before ending like 4Kids short-lived uncut DVDs of Shaman King and Yu-Gi-Oh)
So, the presentation in the west would've been more faithful, and covered the actual whole run.
The subbed version would've been more obscure because of likely dub-only home video, yes. But personally, I'd prefer to have decent, available dub-only DVDs than the unwatchable bullshit Funimation have consistently put out. And at least that way, people who watched it on TV could actually watch the damn version they grew up on. (Fans of either the American or Canadian dubs are screwed in this regard; you literally cannot buy the version you remember watching as a kid)
Either way, home media does not serve anyone but the most casual fan, so whether or not the hardcore fans would have to do their own fansubs or not, both versions of this play out the same: Official releases are unwatchable shit, and the hardcore fans prefer to pirate the show so as to not watch an utterly butchered, unwatchable version. So I don't see how this is a drawback.
I'm not going to dignify this with any substantial argument, but suffice it to say: Skipping DB is the single greatest disservice Funimation ever did to Dragon Ball, and to this day, we're still stuck with most people talking about "The Dragon Ball Z franchise", with the entire first 153 episodes/194 chapters that preceeded it being relegated to an even more sour status than GT: A skippable side-adventure only for the hardcore fans.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm Honestly I don't blame them for skipping DB(and I was never confused by any of the stuff with Piccolo),
That is my final word on this, and I'm willing to agree to disagree, if only because I am so fucking tired of arguing about whether or not it's okay to skip the first half of the original run, that I simply refuse to do so here. Apologies if this comes off too harsh; I'm simply fed up with this "Debate" of whether or not the first ~five years of Toriyama's manga was just him faffing about before he got to the "real stuff".
So, what you're saying here is essentially equivalent to comparing the skipping of DB to Funimation only licensing the remake version of Neon Genesis Evangelion, rather than the original series; although the fans like to refer to the original 27-episode run as "Season 0", it was an entirely different production, by an entirely different studio, with an entirely different voice cast, an entirely different animation style, an entirely different style of show-running, etc. And I'm pretty sure Toei lost their license to do anything with their 27-episode Yu-Gi-Oh series before the second, more successful show began. The original Toei Yu-Gi-Oh series hasn't even had any home media release (either in Japan or elsewhere) since the original VHSes (and the Laserdisc of the movie) released when the show was new.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm 4Kids did something similar with Yu-Gi-Oh by skipping the first 27 episodes(mainly because Toei wasn't eager to license them as the lack of card games probably made them a more difficult sell) and that paid off for them.
4Kids didn't skip anything, they picked up the only Yu-Gi-Oh show that was licenseable, and dubbed the entire run (with cuts, admittedly, but... You know what I mean; it's Saban Z-style cutting of stories and episodes, rather than skipping the entire first half of the story).
For all intents and purposes, Yu-Gi-Oh (1998 series) and Yu-Gi-Oh (2000 series) are two entirely different, unrelated adaptations of the original manga. The only reason anyone characterises them as having any kind of connection is that, while the 1998 series' approach was to adapt the early stories in an abridged/cut-down manner, the 2000 series was a much more faithful, traditional adaptation of the manga with filler, starting from when the Duel Monsters card game was introduced... Despite the fact the two series were produced in entirely different manners, and ultimately don't canon with each-other, they do adapt different portions of the original manga, so a lot of fans who aren't as informed about it get the idea that there's a connection beyond them just happening to be adapted from the same manga.
Another apt comparison is the two different anime adaptations of Fullmetal Alchemist. (Admittedly I've never seen either -- and I've never seen any version of Evangelion, either, come to think of it
This is very similar to the "I prefer the Ocean cast for the Saiyan and Namek sagas and the Funimation cast for the Frieza saga onwards" argument; it's the "The way we got it was the best way" way of looking at it. It's impossible to disprove, because we simply didn't get it another way. But I will say that the fact Latin America, France, Germany, and every other non-US territory that got Dragon Ball, got OG DB first, but still went on to have all three series become absolutely massive in their respsective territories, shows that any ideas that OG DB is inherently unmarketable in a way Z isn't, is unsubstantiated bullshit, and ENTIRELY stems from the fact that the way the west got it skipped OG DB, and people have a natural tendency to assume the way they're used to things is the only way of things.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm Look I like DB as much as the next person on here, but it does kind of take some time to really get going and even if it did have better promotion and timeslots in syndication, i'm not too sure it would've been nearly as big as DBZ was.
I'll tell you now: Not only are we not in the best timeline as far as Dragon Ball in the west is concerned, I'm fairly certain we're in one of the worse ones. Though if you want some optimism, I'll note this is far from the darkest timeline: Harmony Gold may have ended up not dubbing all of Dragon Ball, but still sitting on the rights such that we never get the rest, ADV could have acquired it and then got it into a similar mess to Evangelion such that the western rights to it are left in limbo for roughly 20 years...
But Funimation getting ahold of Dragon Ball was still most certainly one of the worst ways it could have gone.
Of course that was how it happened. They aired it in the middle of the frickin' Cell arc, they had no idea how to market it (ads presented it as "BEFORE ZEEEE... THERE WAS... DRAGON BALL... MORE ACTION etc." type of thing, then you watch it, and it's got the original, classical-style score, it's telling small-scale, intimate stories, most of the characters you know aren't there, and it has no relevance to the intense, climactic story you're already right in the middle of. It was a fucking sham)Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm Hell even when DB was airing in prime-time slots on Toonami it's ratings were still nowhere near what DBZ was pulling.
Look away from the USA for a moment, though. Canada and the UK aired OG DB, and they aired it after GT (weird, I know). Being the only Dragon Ball on air, thus not having to compete with an in-progress climactic story from the end of the run, it pulled in the same kind of ratings as one expected Dragon Ball franchise material to pull in at that time.
In ratings? Yes, more people watched GT in America than in Japan. The same is true of the Boo arc of Z; Japanese fans checked out of Dragon Ball in the mid-Boo arc, and never tuned back in, really. Actual appreciation of GT is pretty neutral, but people just didn't care at the time. Dragon Ball had run for over ten years by then, people were done.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm Then there's GT which actually was a bigger success here then it was in Japan ironically(where it's ratings while not bad were nowhere near what the series was pulling in it's peak), matter of fact America was one of the only places where GT didn't fail and part of that came down to Funi skipping the first 16 episodes to get right to the episodes that most emulated Z(and then making more money by selling them as "lost episodes" on DVD)
Meanwhile, Funimation's presentation in America, while it brought in high ratings, could not be called a success in anything other than that; the fans utterly hated it, and GT has always been a joke in the western fandom.
And once again, you refer to "Part of that came down to Funi skipping the first 16 episodes"... Again, I must ask how you know this was a positive factor? Pretty sure ratings for the entire run of GT were solid in both the UK and Canada too, and they aired the full runs. Same in France, Latin America, etc... And their presentations were far more faithful, and are looked on far more kindly than America; no one loves GT, in fact I'm told it draws a lot of criticism in France -- it's remembered as the weakest of the three shows, but it's not hated with a burning passion like America. I hear from some friends that Latin American fans could be said to generally just kinda like GT. Again, no one loves it, but it's not the buttmonkey of the fandom.
And as for "get to the episodes that emulated Z"... That's nonsense. It went back to the long-standing style Dragon Ball had had since the 21st Tenkaichi arc (the second ever storyline) of being more villain-centric, rather than "adventure of the week looking for macguffins" as it had been in the very first DB arc. Other than that, I will say... Yes, GT was far more comfortable in its own skin 16 episodes in; it had settled into its unique style, and found its niche. But you'll find you get that with ANY show where you skip an arbitrary number of episodes from the beginning. And by doing that, you mess up character progressions, and skip any good stuff the beginning may have had to offer.
Again, what you're doing here is just "The way we got it was the best way", which is always nonsense, argued only by people who refuse to see the flaws in something they're nostalgic for.
Sure.Planetnamek wrote: Mon Feb 24, 2020 4:46 pm Some shows that are big in Japan and other overseas countries just don't catch on here for whatever reason and that's just the sad truth and no amount of angry words for Funi are going to change that. Just look at Saint Seiya, its been dubbed no less then three times now in the U.S. and it's still nowhere near as big as it is elsewhere, sometimes you just have to accept that certain things just aren't going to catch on here.
But Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Z, and Dragon Ball GT have consistently been big everywhere. And OG DB wasn't even a failure necessarily in the USA; it has a rather significant cult following. But most people barely even think of it as existing.
A false dichotomy is when you present "It's either this or this" in a situation where that's not the case. And so far, your post is full of that; at every turn, your philosophy has been "Either it's how it was, or it wouldn't have done as well as it did." Which there is zero evidence for. Dragon Ball was a success in the west, yes. That doesn't mean we got it in the best way that we could have, or that any decision made along the way other than importing it, was a good one.
In fact, we know pretty well that back in '99, people hated Funi changing the cast, people hated Funi changing the music... Every change Funi made was utterly loathed by the fans at the time. But the casuals just watched on without caring, and grew to understand the way they got it to be the only way they knew it, and most of these people have never considered that things could have been better. Most people don't consider that it would've given better work if Dragon Ball had actually been voiced by professional voice actors throughout its entire run, rather than just in the first two seasons of Z. (Yes, Funi's in-house cast eventually could be called professional, but back in '99-'04? Hell no)
Most people don't consider that it would've given a better product if they'd got it all in order. Everywhere I know of where Dragon Ball was successful outside of the USA, the UK, and Canada, Dragon Ball was done in order, and generally was presented more faithfully than the USA version, and we got consistent smash-hits. And naturally, one can't really argue that a run is better if you deprive it of 153 episodes that would have been well-loved, and most people in the USA simply never gave OG DB a single glance, so clearly, the ball was dropped hard here.
Most people don't consider that it would've given a better product if it had been presented more faithfully. People love Dragon Ball, they don't love Funimation's adaptational changes. If that was the case, Kai 1.0 would have been a massive flop, and the shows would've fallen in popularity over their run (despite Funi's work on the original run being consistently shit, they did improve; not enough, but it was a lot of improvement, and in fairness, after how bad season 3 was, there was no where to go but up), and yet Dragon Ball's popularity in the west only grew.
Again, you have a core misconception to your understanding of this: A false dichotomy that either we got what we got, or we got something worse. And that's simply nonsense. We got what we got, and we have no idea what would've happened if anything was different, but all evidence from how it's gone down in other countries points to Funimation fucking it up at every turn.
Dragon Ball was a success in spite of Funimation, not because of Funimation.



