Where was is it Kefula was a "demonic Saiyan"? Cabbe was talking about Kale. Kefula is completely sane. Cabbe made no reference to Kale's green hair when speaking of the demonic Saiyan so saying since Kefula has green Super Saiyan hair doesn’t mean she’s a demonic Saiyan. Kefula's behavior, again, is pretty sane.Bergamo wrote:I would prefer if Gohan and Roshi went out fighting Kefla and then Frieza and 17 fought Dyspo and Kahseral. Why?prince212 wrote:Freeza helping gohan against kafla has a lot of sense ( his battle against those saiyan girls was unfinished ) ..Saiga wrote:I think this is going to be the manga's version of Gohan&Freeza vs Dyspo, with Kafla replacing Dyspo. So Gohan will sacrifice himself so Freeza can eliminate both Kafla and Gohan.
That's assuming Toriyama's notes were specific enough to include Freeza and Gohan teaming up.
I don't think Dyspo will be God-tier in the manga, he hasn't shown that level and Toppo has some kind of 'God aura' power up to reach that level.
And 17-Roshi taking dyspo- kahseral could be a nice battle too ..
Too bad that vegeta - toppo and goku-Jiren seem to be fixed battles , but who knows ..
Kefla is a Demon Saiyan. Gohan is a Saiyan and Roshi has a demon sealing technique.
Kahseral is a cyborg. 17 is a cyborg.
Goku/Vegeta/Frieza vs Jiren/Toppo/Dyspo is basically perfect, so why change it.
"Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Correction: Kefla is 50% demonic.Meshack wrote:Where was is it Kefula was a "demonic Saiyan"? Cabbe was talking about Kale. Kefula is completely sane. Cabbe made no reference to Kale's green hair when speaking of the demonic Saiyan so saying since Kefula has green Super Saiyan hair doesn’t mean she’s a demonic Saiyan. Kefula's behavior, again, is pretty sane.Bergamo wrote:I would prefer if Gohan and Roshi went out fighting Kefla and then Frieza and 17 fought Dyspo and Kahseral. Why?prince212 wrote: Freeza helping gohan against kafla has a lot of sense ( his battle against those saiyan girls was unfinished ) ..
And 17-Roshi taking dyspo- kahseral could be a nice battle too ..
Too bad that vegeta - toppo and goku-Jiren seem to be fixed battles , but who knows ..
Kefla is a Demon Saiyan. Gohan is a Saiyan and Roshi has a demon sealing technique.
Kahseral is a cyborg. 17 is a cyborg.
Goku/Vegeta/Frieza vs Jiren/Toppo/Dyspo is basically perfect, so why change it.
My explanations for the events of my favorite current manga.
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I don't think that's literally demonic.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!
- RandomGuy96
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8881
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: San Diego, California, USA
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Is Broly literally the devil?
The Monkey King wrote:It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWokeRandomGuy96 wrote:He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Don't know how accurate this is, since it might be a dub line: when Piccolo addresses him as a monster Broly replies saying he's not a monster, but the devil itself.RandomGuy96 wrote:Is Broly literally the devil?
I don't have a problem with these when they are minimal, but when they happen at every chapter it's kinda annoying.prince212 wrote:I love those references
But on the structure of the fight, yes? Like I said above, it's all cool doing references to the original work here and there, but not all the time. I remember seeing a interview of Toriyama pointing that Toyotaro should try do his own thing instead of trying to mimic him.Bergamo wrote:Reconstructing panel layouts is lazy on Toyotaro's parts, but they don't affect the narrative.
乃亜
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
All of your examples are from 20+ chapters ago. Toyotaro doesn't reference as often as he used to.Noah wrote:Don't know how accurate this is, since it might be a dub line: when Piccolo addresses him as a monster Broly replies saying he's not a monster, but the devil itself.RandomGuy96 wrote:Is Broly literally the devil?
I don't have a problem with these when they are minimal, but when they happen at every chapter it's kinda annoying.prince212 wrote:I love those references
But on the structure of the fight, yes? Like I said above, it's all cool doing references to the original work here and there, but not all the time. I remember seeing a interview of Toriyama pointing that Toyotaro should try do his own thing instead of trying to mimic him.Bergamo wrote:Reconstructing panel layouts is lazy on Toyotaro's parts, but they don't affect the narrative.
My explanations for the events of my favorite current manga.
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Yep, nowadays he tends to reference his own stuff, making the fights feel very repetitiveBergamo wrote:All of your examples are from 20+ chapters ago. Toyotaro doesn't reference as often as he used to.
[spoiler]



[/spoiler]乃亜
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
No it’s accurate. Broly believed he was worse than a monster.Noah wrote:Don't know how accurate this is, since it might be a dub line: when Piccolo addresses him as a monster Broly replies saying he's not a monster, but the devil itself.RandomGuy96 wrote:Is Broly literally the devil?
I don't have a problem with these when they are minimal, but when they happen at every chapter it's kinda annoying.prince212 wrote:I love those references
But on the structure of the fight, yes? Like I said above, it's all cool doing references to the original work here and there, but not all the time. I remember seeing a interview of Toriyama pointing that Toyotaro should try do his own thing instead of trying to mimic him.Bergamo wrote:Reconstructing panel layouts is lazy on Toyotaro's parts, but they don't affect the narrative.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I don’t notice most of those kind of things to be honest, it doesn’t bother me . I guess some people is just looking to catch those references or same poses . Were you able to notice them all without somebody to show them to you ?Noah wrote:Yep, nowadays he tends to reference his own stuff, making the fights feel very repetitiveBergamo wrote:All of your examples are from 20+ chapters ago. Toyotaro doesn't reference as often as he used to.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
But ei I’m not a manga defender , I have mayor concerns about some panels clearly bad executed , wrong scales , weird necks ... that happened here and there and I’m shock he and the people who is supposed to be behind released those panels without correcting them .
Overall I’m happy with the result and waiting for the next chapter impatiently
It was as if a whole lot of people ...were screaming in pain....
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I get how some of those examples could annoy you, but a flurry of punches is a flurry of punches. I don't know how you expect every single panel to look unique. The real issue is the ATATATATA panels where a character punches from the right of the page to the left. That's a super lazy way to show who has the advantage in a battle.Noah wrote:Yep, nowadays he tends to reference his own stuff, making the fights feel very repetitiveBergamo wrote:All of your examples are from 20+ chapters ago. Toyotaro doesn't reference as often as he used to.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
My explanations for the events of my favorite current manga.
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
DBS Manga Explained: Goku Black's Transformations
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Toyotarou's mediocre art style can become really distracting at times. It wouldn't matter if the story telling was good enough to compensate, but that's rarely the case; if not ever. Despite the manga being my ultimate preference (as with most things), I still hold by my opinion of Toyotarou not being suited for the role of a mangaka. Sole illustrations -- as awkwardly proportioned as they may be at times -- are what he does best, I feel.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Hi.Noah wrote:
That's funny, cause that's exactly what the manga do!
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
I'm sure you, as a reasonable person, can see that there's a clear difference between referencing old panels from the original manga and reskinning wholesale narrative cues from the original.
When will it be Ledgic's time to shine?
http://i.imgur.com/XAnj7Yi.jpg
I checked out of geek culture after I saw the Snyder Cut. Everything else is "sentimental candyfloss."
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
While that is absolutely something people will do, that search is par for the course at this point and it isn't something I look forward to watching anymore. It's also not related to the Gohan/Kefla situation.prince212 wrote:You forgot to mention the reference drama , thousands of fans looking for itAlruneia wrote: I'm also somehow looking forward to it, though in my case that's probably because I can't wait to see the fandom react to whatever happens. If Gohan wins, there'll be drama. If Kefla wins, there'll be drama. If something else happens entirely, there'll definitely be drama. It's going to be interesting. (And if this thread gets locked during the leak period, which it does tend to do, that'll probably be a good thing.)
Probably Kanzenshuu's biggest Bulla fangirl. Current avatar: DBU Bulla as Sailor Princess Sadala, based on Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance
Dragon Ball Ultimate - 76 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link
Dragon Ball Ultimate - 76 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I don't really get what you're trying to say. Most of those aren't even references. Like Bergamo said, a flurry of punches is a flurry of punches and even then none of those images are copied from the others (their poses are different etc.).Noah wrote:Yep, nowadays he tends to reference his own stuff, making the fights feel very repetitiveBergamo wrote:All of your examples are from 20+ chapters ago. Toyotaro doesn't reference as often as he used to.
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
However
this is an issue that is easy to see and it's happening quite often.Bergamo wrote:The real issue is the ATATATATA panels where a character punches from the right of the page to the left. That's a super lazy way to show who has the advantage in a battle.
But I agree that Toyotaro's fight scenes could be better.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
There’s surely a difference, you are right, but this doesn’t excuse Toyotaro for literally copying old panels from the manga. The manga is a visual story, seeing the same things I already saw in the original manga is not good for the story either, as it isn’t when the anime rehashed the Namek fight, the only major instance of such a thing happening in the anime (although there are other minor ones of course) or when it too references/callbacks past events (e.g. Vegeta’s Final Flash vs Magetta, Freeza looking exactly how he looked on Namek after tanking the Genkidama, when he tanked Toppo’s hakai).TKA wrote:Hi.Noah wrote:
That's funny, cause that's exactly what the manga do!
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
I'm sure you, as a reasonable person, can see that there's a clear difference between referencing old panels from the original manga and reskinning wholesale narrative cues from the original.
I think these visual callbacks instances have been more present in the manga, where Toyotaro has often reused past events for his visual storytelling, while the anime used them fewer times but they also reused past plot points, something I don’t remember Toyotaro ever doing.
No one can deny how visual homages have a bigger impact on the manga, which already has limited pages and panels to work with.
References to past events are a problem of both the anime and manga of Super, by the way, so I just wished they would just cease.
Callbacks such as Goku reacting his fight with his Grandpa on episode 94 are more than fine and appreciated. It made sense in the context because he was exactly on the same ring where he last met Gohan.
In general, if the homages fit with the context without feeling out of nowhere, I can live with them, and I can like them.
Frost looking like Goku after he got kneed in the stomach by Raditz, for example, had no reason to be a thing in that context. Literally no reason. As there was literally no reason for Piccolo to sacrifice himself to save Gohan in the same way he did back in the Saiyan arc. It didn’t impact the plot in any way.
Goku and Vegeta using their iconic poses when training in the manga is a good callback, and it makes sense in the context. As does Freeza giving Goku his energy to repay his debt.
These callbacks work. The list of those that work and do not is long. Which is itself a problem, as I am quite tired of them riding off nostalgia with these callbacks. I would rather have none than having some that work and some that don’t.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”
What I consider canonical
What I consider canonical
Spoiler:
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I think it helps that Goku's imaginary fight with Gohan was framed differently from the original scene and used different camera angles. The reference isn't so in-your-face and might slip by if you don't remember the exact sequence of that fight. Contrast that to Frieza's scene which is extremely similar to the original in terms of composition.emperior wrote: Callbacks such as Goku reacting his fight with his Grandpa on episode 94 are more than fine and appreciated. It made sense in the context because he was exactly on the same ring where he last met Gohan.
In general, if the homages fit with the context without feeling out of nowhere, I can live with them, and I can like them.
That's why I've suggested that Toyotaro should try drawing his reference panels from different perspectives if he insists on having them. That way you're at least getting some kind of fresh spin with your nostalgia. But I'd rather Toei and Toyo both cut way back on the callbacks and give us more cool new stuff instead.
-
reecehoward
- Beyond Newbie
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 7:52 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I'd argue that Ssb Vegito vs Merged Zamasu was a blatant rehash of Super Vegito vs Buuhan. While it might have been illustrated differently, it was overall the same events minus Vegito getting absorbed.emperior wrote:There’s surely a difference, you are right, but this doesn’t excuse Toyotaro for literally copying old panels from the manga. The manga is a visual story, seeing the same things I already saw in the original manga is not good for the story either, as it isn’t when the anime rehashed the Namek fight, the only major instance of such a thing happening in the anime (although there are other minor ones of course) or when it too references/callbacks past events (e.g. Vegeta’s Final Flash vs Magetta, Freeza looking exactly how he looked on Namek after tanking the Genkidama, when he tanked Toppo’s hakai).TKA wrote:Hi.Noah wrote:
That's funny, cause that's exactly what the manga do!
[spoiler]
[/spoiler]
I'm sure you, as a reasonable person, can see that there's a clear difference between referencing old panels from the original manga and reskinning wholesale narrative cues from the original.
I think these visual callbacks instances have been more present in the manga, where Toyotaro has often reused past events for his visual storytelling, while the anime used them fewer times but they also reused past plot points, something I don’t remember Toyotaro ever doing.
No one can deny how visual homages have a bigger impact on the manga, which already has limited pages and panels to work with.
References to past events are a problem of both the anime and manga of Super, by the way, so I just wished they would just cease.
Callbacks such as Goku reacting his fight with his Grandpa on episode 94 are more than fine and appreciated. It made sense in the context because he was exactly on the same ring where he last met Gohan.
In general, if the homages fit with the context without feeling out of nowhere, I can live with them, and I can like them.
Frost looking like Goku after he got kneed in the stomach by Raditz, for example, had no reason to be a thing in that context. Literally no reason. As there was literally no reason for Piccolo to sacrifice himself to save Gohan in the same way he did back in the Saiyan arc. It didn’t impact the plot in any way.
Goku and Vegeta using their iconic poses when training in the manga is a good callback, and it makes sense in the context. As does Freeza giving Goku his energy to repay his debt.
These callbacks work. The list of those that work and do not is long. Which is itself a problem, as I am quite tired of them riding off nostalgia with these callbacks. I would rather have none than having some that work and some that don’t.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Listen.emperior wrote: There’s surely a difference, you are right, but this doesn’t excuse Toyotaro for literally copying old panels from the manga.
If all the anime did was was copying animation frames from the original Z, I would've just rolled my eyes and not pay any attention to that. I don't care about that stuff beyond an eyeroll or sometime a "oh, that's neat". You don't see me complaining about the anime copying Broly fight choreography for Kale, or whatever.
What the anime does is steal whole beats from the original though. Let's look at an example with this fight:
Goku fights him and does better than everyone else, but Opponent is holding back. Opponent decides to take Goku just a wee bit seriously. Opponent beats the shit out of Goku. Goku is revealed to have been using Kaioken the whole time to try to keep up. Goku busts out the spirit bomb. It fails. Goku transforms to a new form. Goku proceeds to beat the shit out of Opponent.
Am I talking about Goku vs Jiren or Goku vs Frieza?
When will it be Ledgic's time to shine?
http://i.imgur.com/XAnj7Yi.jpg
I checked out of geek culture after I saw the Snyder Cut. Everything else is "sentimental candyfloss."
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
I thought you stopped seeing the anime around episode 100? Because it shows by this post. I don’t deny how the Goku vs Jiren fight borrowed 2-3 elements from the Namek one, and I don’t deny how I would have preferred it to play a little differently.TKA wrote:Listen.emperior wrote: There’s surely a difference, you are right, but this doesn’t excuse Toyotaro for literally copying old panels from the manga.
If all the anime did was was copying animation frames from the original Z, I would've just rolled my eyes and not pay any attention to that. I don't care about that stuff beyond an eyeroll or sometime a "oh, that's neat". You don't see me complaining about the anime copying Broly fight choreography for Kale, or whatever.
What the anime does is steal whole beats from the original though. Let's look at an example with this fight:
Goku fights him and does better than everyone else, but Opponent is holding back. Opponent decides to take Goku just a wee bit seriously. Opponent beats the shit out of Goku. Goku is revealed to have been using Kaioken the whole time to try to keep up. Goku busts out the spirit bomb. It fails. Goku transforms to a new form. Goku proceeds to beat the shit out of Opponent.
Am I talking about Goku vs Jiren or Goku vs Frieza?
But first of all, Goku didn’t do better than “everyone else”. Jiren had just fought Kale and Maji Kayo before him.
Second, Goku didn’t fare that better than those two. He was just able to stay on the ring and Jiren decided to wait for Goku to gather energy for his strongest attack, to take it head on with his absolutely power and to show everyone how he was the strongest on the ring. Quite different from Freeza’s fight. The bit about it being revealed that Goku was always fighting at his best is the same in the manga, so...
For last, Goku transformed out of nowhere because he failed with the Genkidama, not due to anger like on Namek and Jiren was literally unscathed by the Genkidama, unlike Freeza. Even then, Omen doesn’t do shit to Jiren except landing a knee to his stomach and dodging each of Jiren’s attacks. Then it ends and Jiren finishes Goku but fails to ring him out due to Hit attacking him. It’s only 20 episodes later that Goku manages to beat Jiren, and even then they fight on an almost equal level.
If you are going to keep attacking the anime for its downfalls, at least make sure you watch it. In your case, finish it or at the very least watch the episodes you are criticizing, which are 109 and 110 for your information.
I don’t come here to bash the manga chapters I haven’t read. I have read all of it, I have praised it whenever I felt like it deserved praise and criticized it whenever I felt it needed to be criticized. The same is for the anime. I expect you to do the same if you intend to discuss about it.
悟 “Vincit qui se vincit”
What I consider canonical
What I consider canonical
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super (Manga)" Official Discussion Thread
Not unique, but not exactly equal, see? We had some of these in the original manga, but were more directed to locations than the fights, I just expect more variations.Bergamo wrote:I don't know how you expect every single panel to look unique. The real issue is the ATATATATA panels where a character punches from the right of the page to the left. That's a super lazy way to show who has the advantage in a battle.
乃亜
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:








[/spoiler]

