Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.

Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help

User avatar
SaiyanGod117
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:31 am

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by SaiyanGod117 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:29 pm

Super is GT level trash, so it would make sense for it to get GT level ratings. It doesn't matter what place it's fucking in, what matters is the household rating. I don't who came up with the headcannon that placement ranks aboves ratings, I actually need some proof of that. This isn't a NASCAR race.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:47 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote:Super is GT level trash, so it would make sense for it to get GT level ratings. It doesn't matter what place it's fucking in, what matters is the household rating. I don't who came up with the headcannon that placement ranks aboves ratings, I actually need some proof of that. This isn't a NASCAR race.
It does matter the placement. Because if it keeps the same placement, but the ratings drop then it means ratings across the board have dropped. If multiple TV shows have ratings that are dropping, how could you possibly blame the content super is showing ? It just means that less people tuned into tv that week for whatever reason.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
LuckyCat
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:28 pm
Location: The Sacred Land
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by LuckyCat » Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:52 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote:I don't who came up with the headcannon that placement ranks aboves ratings, I actually need some proof of that. This isn't a NASCAR race.
1. Head canon is used to describe a fan's opinions on what should be considered canon in fiction. See also, fanon.

2. The percentage numbers are arbitrary because they don't gauge the success of the show. Look how high percentage-wise Dragon Ball Kai 1.0 performed during its run. Yet the show was still cancelled. That should tell you something.
kinisking wrote:It does matter the placement. Because if it keeps the same placement, but the ratings drop then it means ratings across the board have dropped. If multiple TV shows have ratings that are dropping, how could you possibly blame the content super is showing ? It just means that less people tuned into tv that week for whatever reason.
Right, and last weekend was actually Tanabata in Japan, so there you go.

User avatar
kinisking
I Live Here
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:21 pm
Location: United States.

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by kinisking » Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:41 pm

It always confuses me on how people fail to grasp that. It's not hard logic.
Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5921
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by FortuneSSJ » Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:45 pm

precita wrote:Not that it would happen, but I'm sure Super's ratings can be as low as the 2.0's like Naruto's is/was and still go on for years to come just because of merchandize revenue.
Naruto would barely make it to top 10 and Boruto doesn't even know what that is.
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.

Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota

User avatar
SaiyanGod117
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:31 am

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by SaiyanGod117 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:04 pm

kinisking wrote: It does matter the placement. Because if it keeps the same placement, but the ratings drop then it means ratings across the board have dropped. If multiple TV shows have ratings that are dropping, how could you possibly blame the content super is showing ? It just means that less people tuned into tv that week for whatever reason.
However that doesn't happen every time most of the time Super is only the show the ratings are dropping for. You can't keep trying to hold this narrative that the ratings drop for others shows is the result for Super's low ratings. When in-fact the ratings drop is too negligible to make a difference. Super is airing on one of the best TV networks in Japans, on one of the best time slots of the day. Yet it's been stuck in the same spot for two years, failing to grab any kind of new audience and now losing it's existing audience. Moreover, the thing that gets a show a placement in the first place is ratings.
LuckyCat wrote:
SaiyanGod117 wrote:I don't who came up with the headcannon that placement ranks aboves ratings, I actually need some proof of that. This isn't a NASCAR race.
1. Head canon is used to describe a fan's opinions on what should be considered canon in fiction. See also, fanon.
1. Don't be a smartass, I know what headcanon means.
2. The percentage numbers are arbitrary because they don't gauge the success of the show. Look how high percentage-wise Dragon Ball Kai 1.0 performed during its run. Yet the show was still cancelled. That should tell you something.
Animated shows rely on merchandise sales, Kai doesn't prove anything. Ratings wise; Kai was a success because the content Kai showed wasn't dogshit. You missed my whole point entirely.

User avatar
LuckyCat
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:28 pm
Location: The Sacred Land
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by LuckyCat » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:10 pm

kinisking wrote:It always confuses me on how people fail to grasp that. It's not hard logic.
Yeah, I mean, I understand that it's easy to look at a set of numbers, see a low one and think of that as like a failing grade. But if you're not looking at other factors you're really missing out on a huge part of the ratings discussion here.

User avatar
Chuquita
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 15233
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 2:16 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Chuquita » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:17 pm

Last weekend was Tanabata? Didn't know. That explains a lot. Who's going to wake up early to watch TV on a holiday weekend?
On hiatus.

my tumblr

User avatar
Neo-Makaiōshin
I Live Here
Posts: 2446
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:31 pm
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Neo-Makaiōshin » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:21 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote: However that doesn't happen every time most of the time Super is only the show the ratings are dropping for. You can't keep trying to hold this narrative that the ratings drop for others shows is the result for Super's low ratings. When in-fact the ratings drop is too negligible to make a difference. Super is airing on one of the best TV networks in Japans, on one of the best time slots of the day. Yet it's been stuck in the same spot for two years, failing to grab any kind of new audience and now losing it's existing audience. Moreover, the thing that gets a show a placement in the first place is ratings.
1. Kinishking never made that narrative that the other shows dropped rating due to DBSuper dropping its, the user only said that if one show (Super in this case) dropped in ratings so did others across the board.

2. If you look at this thread first post you will see that DBS has a few times placed in the top 5. The major reason why DBS has been stuck on "the same spot" for years is due to facing with cultural judgernauts like Sazae-san, Crayon Shin-Chan, One Piece and others.
Dragon Ball was always a kid series and fans should stop being in denial.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:06 pm

SaiyanGod117 you seem to be under some illusion here ratings matter and that ratings = quality. Both are patently false. Also ratings are down in general from 2010, OP was pulling 15% back then. You might not like Super but your looking for some reason to show it's failure when it's not, much less the fact that Japan had a holiday on the weekend. Also DVR recordings and streaming aren't counted in these...

User avatar
Cure Dragon 255
Banned
Posts: 5658
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Cure Dragon 255 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:35 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote:Super is GT level trash, so it would make sense for it to get GT level ratings. It doesn't matter what place it's fucking in, what matters is the household rating. I don't who came up with the headcannon that placement ranks aboves ratings, I actually need some proof of that. This isn't a NASCAR race.
You do know GT had much higher ratings than Super right?

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by precita » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:50 pm

People being desperate to say Super is failing because of ratings is bizarre. If you looked at TOEI's last sales reports, Dragonball is making more money than it has in more than a decade.

User avatar
MajinMan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1237
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 3:42 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by MajinMan » Wed Jul 12, 2017 7:45 pm

Super got it's 4th lowest rating ever? Welp, looks like the Japanese fans knew that the episode would suck and did not watch it ahead of time. It was fun while it lasted guys, but it seems like Super is gonna get cancelled mid-tournament.
Heroes come and go, but legends are forever.

60.

Rest in peace.

User avatar
Cure Dragon 255
Banned
Posts: 5658
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 5:23 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Cure Dragon 255 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:21 pm

Yes, that's why Precure and Yokai Watch are on their millionth season with much lower ratings. This doomsaying is getting real old. I really cant believe people actually buy into this whole thing.

Also, if it was cancelled, it could mean either movies with much better animation or the fact that Dragon Ball finally gets to rest in peace.

User avatar
SaiyanGod117
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:31 am

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by SaiyanGod117 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:49 pm

Baggie_Saiyan wrote:SaiyanGod117 you seem to be under some illusion here ratings matter and that ratings = quality. Both are patently false. Also ratings are down in general from 2010, OP was pulling 15% back then. You might not like Super but your looking for some reason to show it's failure when it's not, much less the fact that Japan had a holiday on the weekend. Also DVR recordings and streaming aren't counted in these...
It's seems obvious to me you can't read in-between the lines, it's really the halllmark of these recent post. If ratings actually mattered on whether a TV show would stay on the air, then DBZ Kai wouldn't have been canceled. However, it is straight up misguided to say ratings don't correlate with quality (you think ratings drop in ROF arc was coincidence or something) it's helps my case even more that during the climactic points the ratings are relatively the same. Also meaning DVR and Streaming ratings don't mean shit, if they did that would mean a lot more people would be tuning in to watch Super. Since people usually use DVR and streaming services to catch up to a current season, so they can watch it weekly.

User avatar
Boo Machine
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1928
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
Location: On the Track to NoWhere

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Boo Machine » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:01 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote: Since people usually use DVR and streaming services to catch up to a current season, so they can watch it weekly.
Or just to watch it later if they couldn't catch the a show when it aired. Is that not one of the good things about DVR and streaming services? That you can watch when it's most convenient? My friend works when Super airs so he usually has to catch it the day after. I imagine there are a few people in Japan who like the show and are in a similar situation, which I think was the point of bringing them up. That some people who like the show can't always catch it when it airs thus not contributing to the ratings.

At least that's how I believe it works.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black

I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!

To Infinity, then stop!

Anime are Cartoons.

User avatar
SaiyanGod117
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:31 am

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by SaiyanGod117 » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:14 pm

Boo Machine wrote:
SaiyanGod117 wrote: Since people usually use DVR and streaming services to catch up to a current season, so they can watch it weekly.
Or just to watch it later if they couldn't catch the a show when it aired. Is that not one of the good things about DVR and streaming services? That you can watch when it's most convenient? My friend works when Super airs so he usually has to catch it the day after. I imagine there are a few people in Japan who like the show and are in a similar situation, which I think was the point of bringing them up. That some people who like the show can't always catch it when it airs thus not contributing to the ratings.

At least that's how I believe it works.
Yes that's definitely a reason why people use DVRs and Streaming services too, although during the climactic/conclusive moments of TV show. The ratings for a show will shoot up, due to more and more new and old fans being able to catch up to the program their watching because of those services. Which is the point I've been making, DBS isn't really attracting a new audience.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by precita » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:21 pm

Did Kai ever make the top 10? I wasn't following Kai when it originally aired in Japan. Does anyone have a list of it's ratings archived anywhere?

User avatar
Hit!!
Regular
Posts: 667
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:31 am
Location: Dominican Republic

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Hit!! » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:28 pm

Most of the other shows were also low this week.

User avatar
Boo Machine
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1928
Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
Location: On the Track to NoWhere

Re: Dragon Ball Super: TV Ratings Discussion Thread

Post by Boo Machine » Wed Jul 12, 2017 9:30 pm

SaiyanGod117 wrote:
Boo Machine wrote:
SaiyanGod117 wrote: Since people usually use DVR and streaming services to catch up to a current season, so they can watch it weekly.
Or just to watch it later if they couldn't catch the a show when it aired. Is that not one of the good things about DVR and streaming services? That you can watch when it's most convenient? My friend works when Super airs so he usually has to catch it the day after. I imagine there are a few people in Japan who like the show and are in a similar situation, which I think was the point of bringing them up. That some people who like the show can't always catch it when it airs thus not contributing to the ratings.

At least that's how I believe it works.
Yes that's definitely a reason why people use DVRs and Streaming services too, although during the climactic/conclusive moments of TV show. The ratings for a show will shoot up, due to more and more new and old fans being able to catch up to the program their watching because of those services. Which is the point I've been making, DBS isn't really attracting a new audience.
Maybe, maybe not, admittedly I don't know very much about how that all works, but I think there is more to that than just not enough people sitting down to watch a show as it airs and it goes for any show that can be streamed or DVR'D. Some might just exclusively watch it through DVR or streaming. I remember when I was a kid and I would never wake up in time for Saturday morning cartoons, I would have my mother record them for me on the VCR to watch them later. Again I imagine there are plenty of fans in a similar situation.

I think when people say "ratings don't matter" they mean that the ratings don't really tell us how many people are a fan of the show because the ratings only shows us the numbers of those who watched it when it aired and doesn't count those who watch it later or even those who watch it outside of Japan like some of us here do.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black

I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!

To Infinity, then stop!

Anime are Cartoons.

Post Reply