It would be a really interesting tourn of eventsJinzoningen MULE wrote:We don't know that for sure.Yamcha upset fan wrote:ginyu frog is still alive in this time line,,,,
just saying,,,
...that being said, he isn't totally unwelcome.
"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
- Yamcha upset fan
- Newbie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2015 9:14 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
whut? I dont speak pain
- Luso Saiyan
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Says who? You know nothing about this power/transformation, therefore you can't make any of those claims.Friezacooler wrote:unlike trunks power up that Vegeta and Goku couldn't achieve. but toei fanboyism did, impossible to explain inuniverse.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Agreed on this, but adjust the tone a little.Luso Saiyan wrote:Says who? You know nothing about this power/transformation, therefore you can't make any of those claims.
No one potentially knows any more than anyone else, unless you somehow have the script for the show or manga. Like I said before, it's best to just wait before calling "PLOTHOLE! The arc is ruined because this can't work!" Let me give an example. Say after Episode 47 aired, someone leaked that Black was Zamasu. Right then, it'd make absolutely zero sense because there hadn't been an explanation, yet. Do you see what I mean now?
- dbs fanboy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 4:08 pm
- Location: Spain
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I agree with what you say, but i don't think that the argument is that simple, these responses were created due to the fact that he said that Trunk's power up was "anti Z", when the same thing happened on the series and he's judging the power up too soon (event thought it will probably end up being just a stupid rage boost such as Vegeta's in BoG, cool, necessary, but stupid)TheMikado wrote:I don't understand why multiple people are taking story plots completely out of context.
I'm sure lots of Charles dickens works, especially Christmas carol would look like nonsensical @$$pulls if you want to remove the context and he story they occur in. In not sure how doing that acts as a defense for Super.
People, are just stating that inside the fictional universe created. The current works has inconsistencies versus the previous. Rather than saying yeah I guys a few decades of time could result in that we have people sticking their fingers in their ears and saying no, no, no if this sucks, the other stuff you love sucks too. It's like the argument 6 year olds use, it's so bizarre.
Super is different then it's predecessors and that's ok. Not everyone is going to like those changes and yes the storytelling is not at fluid or streamlined. Super feels like a disjointedly constructed story written by a lot of different people because well, it is.
I really miss ma boy, Black
dbgtFO wrote:
dbgtFO wrote:
Spoiler:
- Luso Saiyan
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
What tone?Anime Kitten wrote:Agreed on this, but adjust the tone a little.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Your post seemed a bit rude toned, that's all.Luso Saiyan wrote:What tone?
- Luso Saiyan
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
- Location: Portugal
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Wasn't rude at all. Don't blame me for how you decided to read it.Anime Kitten wrote:Your post seemed a bit rude toned, that's all.
- Anime Kitten
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2016 3:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Again, I find this very rude toned. But I'm not going to drag this on, so I won't respond any more.Luso Saiyan wrote:Wasn't rude at all. Don't blame me for how you decided to read it.
When does everyone think the arc will end? I'm guessing 66 or 67.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
If there are no more surprises then, I'd say the arc would end around episode 67, 68, maybe a little more depending on how long the "final fight" and ending is.
I just want to know if this arc will connect to anything in a future arc. I mean, you have guys messing around in different timelines and universes. That has to cause something. Especially with the main culprit being "Son Goku". Despite all the back and forth between Universe 10 and 7 we haven't seen much of 10. I'd like a little more on that.
I just want to know if this arc will connect to anything in a future arc. I mean, you have guys messing around in different timelines and universes. That has to cause something. Especially with the main culprit being "Son Goku". Despite all the back and forth between Universe 10 and 7 we haven't seen much of 10. I'd like a little more on that.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
- FortuneSSJ
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5821
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
What bugs me is the absence of the God of Destruction from Uni10. HIs name should already have been mentioned by someone, at least.Boo Machine wrote: Despite all the back and forth between Universe 10 and 7 we haven't seen much of 10. I'd like a little more on that.
Beerus killed a person from his Universe. In this case Beerus saved his/her life by protecting the Kaioshin, but I would like to see his/her approach to that.
A world without Dragon Ball is just meh.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I stand by my earlier November estimate (so 65-68). At the moment, 67 seems pretty likely to me. It depends on the success of the Evil Containment Wave and on the upcoming Zamack's (I'll use this name for simplicity) level of strength and possible weaknesses. I expect the technique to fail, and I also think that the fact that Black avoided getting erased because he was wearing the Time Ring might come into play. Maybe without the ring he'll either die or be severely weakened. Still hoping for that Sauron-esque moment where Trunks' sword cuts the finger with the Time Ring on it offAnime Kitten wrote:When does everyone think the arc will end? I'm guessing 66 or 67.
Probably Kanzenshuu's biggest Bulla fangirl. Current avatar: DBU Bulla as Sailor Princess Sadala, based on Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance
Dragon Ball Ultimate - 74 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link
Dragon Ball Ultimate - 74 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
No, it's not. Since there's nothing that indicates that no one could ever have surpassed Goku and Freeza after Namek Arc. Dr. Gero is a genius, this is a fact, he was just being cautious, knowing how Goku was getting stronger through the time (RR to Saiyan Arc), making androids that would outclass him no matter what was a great strategy. Also he was not that all impressed with Super Saiyan, he even states that 19 could still defeat himLord Beerus wrote:Explain the scenario with Dr Gero building androids much stronger than Super Saiyans. Because as far as Dr Gero was concerned, he had only collected data from Saiyans while they were on Earth and he had no idea about what happened on Namek with Goku becoming a SSJ, and on top of that, was very surprised with Goku's SSJ abilities and power as whole he transformed in front of him. So how come Android 16, 17 and 18 turned to be as strong as they were? It's quite a plot hole now that you think about it.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Ok I didn't understand what was happening in the thread. Yes it's too early to judge yet, but it certainly lacks the same level of foreshadowing that we have become accustomed to since Z. In Z we were constantly foreshadowing Gohans potential since Raditz and finally delivered in Cell Arc and expanded in the Buu arc. Meanwhile Gokus boosts in terms of the anime were foreshadowed weeks in advance as we never see the "results" of his training for several weeks. The only thing close to this is the SSJ3 transformation which ending up not doing much in the end. I suppose you could count fusion too but even that was foreshadowed with the pairing of those two in the tournament.dbs fanboy wrote:I agree with what you say, but i don't think that the argument is that simple, these responses were created due to the fact that he said that Trunk's power up was "anti Z", when the same thing happened on the series and he's judging the power up too soon (event thought it will probably end up being just a stupid rage boost such as Vegeta's in BoG, cool, necessary, but stupid)TheMikado wrote:I don't understand why multiple people are taking story plots completely out of context.
I'm sure lots of Charles dickens works, especially Christmas carol would look like nonsensical @$$pulls if you want to remove the context and he story they occur in. In not sure how doing that acts as a defense for Super.
People, are just stating that inside the fictional universe created. The current works has inconsistencies versus the previous. Rather than saying yeah I guys a few decades of time could result in that we have people sticking their fingers in their ears and saying no, no, no if this sucks, the other stuff you love sucks too. It's like the argument 6 year olds use, it's so bizarre.
Super is different then it's predecessors and that's ok. Not everyone is going to like those changes and yes the storytelling is not at fluid or streamlined. Super feels like a disjointedly constructed story written by a lot of different people because well, it is.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
This is a little different in that your argument is that they made the enemy too strong, that's like staying Darkseid is only strong because of Superman. Or Flashs enemies are only fast because he is and calling it a plot hole.Noah wrote:No, it's not. Since there's nothing that indicates that no one could ever have surpassed Goku and Freeza after Namek Arc. Dr. Gero is a genius, this is a fact, he was just being cautious, knowing how Goku was getting stronger through the time (RR to Saiyan Arc), making androids that would outclass him no matter what was a great strategy. Also he was not that all impressed with Super Saiyan, he even states that 19 could still defeat himLord Beerus wrote:Explain the scenario with Dr Gero building androids much stronger than Super Saiyans. Because as far as Dr Gero was concerned, he had only collected data from Saiyans while they were on Earth and he had no idea about what happened on Namek with Goku becoming a SSJ, and on top of that, was very surprised with Goku's SSJ abilities and power as whole he transformed in front of him. So how come Android 16, 17 and 18 turned to be as strong as they were? It's quite a plot hole now that you think about it.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Which argument? If you're talking about I'm being relutant to believe that Base Trunks is above Super Vegetto, then no... I have no problem in characters surpassing others power related, provided it is explained in a rational way, not simply played to audienceTheMikado wrote:This is a little different in that your argument is that they made the enemy too strong, that's like staying Darkseid is only strong because of Superman. Or Flashs enemies are only fast because he is and calling it a plot hole.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
No I meant about Gero making the androids so strong. One is talking about arbitrarily inflating an antagonist to be a challenge for the protagonist vs protagonist inflation to match the antagonist. As with everything, the reasoning is just as important as the execution, in universe there are plausible reasons for the androids strength which have nothing to do with Goku, same with Darkseid and Superman. The difference is a plausible reason for both Blacks strength and Trunks strength are not the explained in universe.Noah wrote:Which argument? If you're talking about I'm being relutant to believe that Base Trunks is above Super Vegetto, then no... I have no problem in characters surpassing others power related, provided it is explained in a rational way, not simply played to audienceTheMikado wrote:This is a little different in that your argument is that they made the enemy too strong, that's like staying Darkseid is only strong because of Superman. Or Flashs enemies are only fast because he is and calling it a plot hole.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Are we sure there's really three Zamasu's?
I'm watching it again now with subs and when Goku brings up that he saw Beerus kill him, Black mentions it has something to do with the time ring somehow.
But if he's a Zamasu from another timeline altogether then the time ring shouldn't play any part in it at all. He shouldn't even know that a Zamasu had died anyway.
That combined with them showing a flashback of the Zamasu who died...it makes me wonder if Black could just be that Zamasu.
I'm watching it again now with subs and when Goku brings up that he saw Beerus kill him, Black mentions it has something to do with the time ring somehow.
But if he's a Zamasu from another timeline altogether then the time ring shouldn't play any part in it at all. He shouldn't even know that a Zamasu had died anyway.
That combined with them showing a flashback of the Zamasu who died...it makes me wonder if Black could just be that Zamasu.
- Sandubadear
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
- Location: Space Amazon
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
In my opinion, Black is from the regular Super timeline, but when Beerus killed Zamasu, the timeline was rewritten (that's what Beerus meant) and Black was never created. However, Black wasn't erased despite his past self being killed, because the Time Ring protected him.Bullza wrote:Are we sure there's really three Zamasu's?
I'm watching it again now with subs and when Goku brings up that he saw Beerus kill him, Black mentions it has something to do with the time ring somehow.
But if he's a Zamasu from another timeline altogether then the time ring shouldn't play any part in it at all. He shouldn't even know that a Zamasu had died anyway.
That combined with them showing a flashback of the Zamasu who died...it makes me wonder if Black could just be that Zamasu.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra
- fadeddreams5
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5156
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
- Location: New York
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Goten, Trunks, and Gohan are prodigies. It was a dumb idea to give the former two SSJ forms, as that cheapened the transformation greatly, but there's simple reasoning behind it. Gohan had a mysterious potential; this was always a unique trait of his. There isn't meant to be an explanation to his hidden powers, though it could be explored if they gave a flip about the character.ArchedThunder wrote:Or had a 4 year old Gohan surpass the power that his father spent his entire life building up with just a few months of training under Piccolo.Lord Beerus wrote:And had an old man in cave capable of building robots much stronger than Super Saiyan with very limited data on what Saiyans were capable with.FortuneSSJ wrote: Anti DBZ? The same DBZ that gave SSJ to 7 years old Goten and 8 years old Trunks?!
Dr. Gero created androids with infinite energy he himself could not control. We're never told what resources he used to achieve this. Clearly he did make miscalculations because he never intended on releasing the androids to begin with--they were too dangerous. He thought him and 20 could get the job done, and he was wrong.
Trunks in Super just got angry and, presumably, attained a form as strong as SSJB, despite never achieving SSJ3, SSJG, or SSJB, and never having hidden powers. It's an asspull to end all asspulls. As bad as Ichigo transforming against Ulquiorra.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I think the arc can end in 70, most likely Merged Zamasu will have a transformation (or more) and that is going to take more episodes, so I don't think the arc is ending until 70 or so.