AgitoZ wrote:Cold Skin wrote:I know. That's why I started by saying I was talking about colors only.
Color-wise, the original is not completely colored, the new version is color-complete, encompassing the complete story this time.
It's an addition if anything. This might be a language thing, but calling it "color-complete" just rubs me the wrong way. Toriyama worked with the limitations he was given. The original did not have it nor did it need it.
I'd liken it to something like the Special Editions to
Star Wars but I'm sure that's over exaggerating.
I know what you mean, and I understand your point of view, in the end it's really all a matter of point of view.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm more into the
Final Fantasy VII Advent Children point of view: to me, just like for this movie's staff, the fact of adding things retroactively makes the previous version incomplete.
For example, with that CGI movie, they released the movie. Then they went back to it, and added details to the graphics, half an hour of new scenes, changes in dialog... And they re-released it as
Final Fantasy VII Advent Children COMPLETE.
And yet, initially, the base movie was a complete work in itself, they had put everything they wanted on it. But adding more things after a while, and since a new version that comes after the "complete" one cannot be "more than complete", it's the new version that is considered "complete" and the previous version retroactively becomes "incomplete".
But as I said, it's all a matter of point of view: for example, if you focus on the author's vision of things, it's the new version that is incomplete - showing some of his choices but masking some other choices with alternative coloring, or even just coloring his original black and white -, while the original version is the "complete Author's Vision".
It's like the difference between an Extended version and a Director's Cut, one doesn't involve the other. Some will consider the extended version as the complete work and the regular version as becoming a version that lacks scenes, while others will consider that the original is the complete version while the extended one is just a "bonus version" with more added material than needed, potentially messing with the author's actual vision.
It's also like a game's story with a game's DLC expanding on this story afterwards: some will consider the story is complete only with those story DLC added, while others will consider the story was complete to start with and that the DLC expansion of the story is just an extra.
So I choose to consider this new edition "complete" color-wise, but I keep considering the Kanzenban as generally the true, unaltered author's vision.
I like - and want - both versions, the one fully handled by the author, and the one having an external staff doing their best to magnify the experience.
I don't believe one is more legitimate than the other, they are both the official manga version, just available in two variations.
