Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:20 pm

Marco Polo wrote:Ugh, why? This sounds so pointless.

Unless they actually do another Bardock special or something :/
Id rather see Broly's Mother... If she was Legendary too..
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:20 pm

Nope. Now he's the offspring of really amazing, great people, one of whom was a time-travelling hero AND Super Saiyan.

When you overexplain something it just becomes utterly f***ing stupid.
There's nothing wrong with elaborating on something. For example, I'd love to know more about Freeza's mysterious species. The problem is where they took the characters.

And Bardock already ruined the whole "low-class trash" image by being probably the 3rd or 2nd strongest saiyan in existence at the time of Planet Vegeta's destruction in the Bardock special.
Id rather see Broly's Mother... If she was Legendary too..
Oh Jesus fuck please no more Broly. Ever.

(Video Game Makers: lol no)
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:22 pm

penguintruth wrote:A little baby doesn't have "memories". Saiyan babies destroy the planets they're sent to because it's in their nature to destroy.
Going by Toriyama's Jaco The Galactic Patrolman, Goku wasn't a baby, he was a 2-year-old boy that could fight and talk.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:23 pm

I guess that officially renders the Bardock special out of the manga's continuity.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:27 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:I guess that officially renders the Bardock special out of the manga's continuity.
Not really. Just change the age of Goku. That's all. Hell honestly we don't even need that seeing the future stuff cause Bardock would most likely do the same thing(Unless you''re like me and count EOB).
So just by changing two things you still got the basic of Bardock's special.

- Bardock and crew went to a Planet and passed the job
- Freeza sends Dodoria and his crew to attack Bardock's crew and Bardock himself
- Bardock tries to warn everyone
- Bardock tries to save the race
- Bardock fails
- Bardock see his son's space pod before he goes out to attack Freeza
- Bardock realizes that Kakarot is the last Saiyan(From Bardock point of view everyone is dying) and want Kakarot to kill Freeza
- "KAKAROOOOOOOOOOOOT!"
- Goku Dragonball story started
- Goku kills Freeza(Trunks timeline)

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:31 pm

[quote="TheGmGoken"
RandomGuy96 wrote:I guess that officially renders the Bardock special out of the manga's continuity.
Not really. Just change the age of Goku. That's all. [/quote]
Nope. Toriyama's recent works, along with his words about Bardock, contradict too much things about the TV Special:
  • Jaco The Galactic Patrolman has Goku as a 2 year-old instead of an infant.
  • Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods has Planet Vegeta destroyed 39 years ago, and Goku is 41 years old, while the TV Special gives Planet Vegeta's destruction & Goku's birth the same date. It also shows Vegeta as a kid having the same hairstyle he has as an adult, instead of having a different hairstyle as the TV Special shows.
  • According to Toriyama, Saiyans get promoted in ranks, but while Bardock was very strong for a low-class, he wasn't strong enough to get a promotion, meaning that his battle power can't be at nearly 10.000, as it's stated in the TV Special.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:32 pm

RandomGuy96 wrote:Oh Jesus fuck please no more Broly. Ever.(Video Game Makers: lol no)
I know what you're thinking, I didnt say that as one of Broly's obnoxious fanboys.. I said that out of honest curiosity, Broly wouldn't be so hate-able if he actually had some proper intergration and actual depth given to him. As he is constantly pushed through the Saiyan fanbase as the leading icon, something could at least redeem his irritating presence. Instead of giving him SSJ-SSJ4 fanwank garbage, he could have had more character development, backstory and actual self-awareness instead of his current 0.5 dimentional character concept.
What would Goku's Mother really do for him now? Unless she were to inspire pan, shes a useless extension demanded by fans who assume it be law that being a bastard son is wrong.
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
penguintruth wrote:Whatever happened to Goku being brain damaged and from poor stock
When was it stated that Goku is a good guy because of his brain damage? All I know is that it erased his memories.
It was said a lot of times throught the earliest of the series in a cooky way that Goku had lost his Saiyan-instinctual programming after he hit his head and thus had to relearn everything eventually taking on the empathy of kind humans thinking he himself was human. Raditz even tries to force Goku to remember his instinctual need for superiority but Goku cant fight it in him to oppress people.
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Nope. Toriyama's recent works, along with his words about Bardock, contradict too much things about the TV Special:
  • Jaco The Galactic Patrolman has Goku as a 2 year-old instead of an infant.
  • Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods has Planet Vegeta destroyed 39 years ago, and Goku is 41 years old, while the TV Special gives Planet Vegeta's destruction & Goku's birth the same date. It also shows Vegeta as a kid having the same hairstyle he has as an adult, instead of having a different hairstyle as the TV Special shows.
  • According to Toriyama, Saiyans get promoted in ranks, but while Bardock was very strong for a low-class, he wasn't strong enough to get a promotion, meaning that his battle power can't be at nearly 10.000, as it's stated in the TV Special.
Basically everything Akira's considered nowadays has been contradicting the old work if not creating more fun-for-frustration plot hole gaps. Though, I don't except the idea that the Episode of Bardock should overwrite the TV-Special in terms of a canon source.

The TV special isnt that hard to adjust if we assume that Goku wasnt born the same day but only notifed to bardock when his power-level started to show and was rejected at that time he was tested. Bardock also may have only just recieved his 10.000 Lv. from the Zenkai's he got, and was never officially registered for a higher class surpassing his former.. as Freeza killed them all before King Vegeta knew of this apparently. Vegeta himself didnt even know Bardock was that strong and still only saw him as weak from his previous power level recording.
Last edited by SingleFringe&Sparks on Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:53 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:36 pm

SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:It was said a lot of times throught the earliest of the series in a cooky way that Goku had lost his Saiyan-instinctual programming after he hit his head and thus had to relearn everything eventually taking on the empathy of kind humans thinking he himself was human. Raditz even tries to force Goku to remember his instinctual need for superiority but Goku cant fight it in him to oppress people.
Yes, because Goku was taught to be evil. We also don't know to what extent he was evil. When he lost his memories, he was taught to be good from Son Gohan.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:39 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote: Nope. Toriyama's recent works, along with his words about Bardock, contradict too much things about the TV Special:
  • Jaco The Galactic Patrolman has Goku as a 2 year-old instead of an infant.
  • Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods has Planet Vegeta destroyed 39 years ago, and Goku is 41 years old, while the TV Special gives Planet Vegeta's destruction & Goku's birth the same date. It also shows Vegeta as a kid having the same hairstyle he has as an adult, instead of having a different hairstyle as the TV Special shows.
  • According to Toriyama, Saiyans get promoted in ranks, but while Bardock was very strong for a low-class, he wasn't strong enough to get a promotion, meaning that his battle power can't be at nearly 10.000, as it's stated in the TV Special.
Your first two points should just be one. I mean I DID say change Goku's age. Which means Goku got sent out the same day the planet was destroyed. So that's not an issue really. About Vegeta's hairstyle. To be fair that's a different artist and animation. Same way Vegeta hair is sometimes Brown or Purple instead of Black. A hairstyle really should't be counted as a contradiction. More or less a different style drawing.

The third point has been theorize by Kaboom:
Kaboom wrote:I wouldn't jump to conclusions about this so quickly -- Toriyama only strictly says that Bardock never was "promoted," not that he never got strong enough to be. If Bardock spent most of his time out on missions one after another and gained strength rapidly in the process, the opportunity for promotion may simply have never occurred.

I'm having flashbacks to the early parts of "part two" of Naruto, where Naruto himself returns to the village to find that most (if not all) of his peers have been promoted to Chunin level or higher, while Naruto himself is still technically a Genin in rank despite being stronger than most of them. I can easily picture something similar being the case with Bardock.
This make sense if you look at Bardock's workload.
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:It was said a lot of times throught the earliest of the series in a cooky way that Goku had lost his Saiyan-instinctual programming after he hit his head and thus had to relearn everything eventually taking on the empathy of kind humans thinking he himself was human. Raditz even tries to force Goku to remember his instinctual need for superiority but Goku cant fight it in him to oppress people.
Yes, because Goku was taught to be evil. We also don't know to what extent he was evil. When he lost his memories, he was taught to be good from Son Gohan.
I think Roshi explanation should cover that up. Goku was a bad boy. He hit his head. And BAM! He's acted better and was well be-haved. With Gohan teaching him basic stuff. This is similar to Okami-San from "Okami-san and her 7 companions". Before she hit her head. Okami-san was similar to Vegeta and Piccolo only talking to Little Red. She hit her head and for the rest of the ep she was nice. Same case goes for Goku.

User avatar
Ryuman
Regular
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:33 am
Location: Taunton, England

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by Ryuman » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:47 pm

Maybe Bardock never even wanted promotion? Being so popular with the low-levels with his sense of comradery probably wouldn't have him itching to move up above them. I suppose he'd be content in his own strength. Hell, maybe even that team spirit itself was what was holding back the decision.

User avatar
Marco Polo
I Live Here
Posts: 2973
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by Marco Polo » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:52 pm

Ryuman wrote:Maybe Bardock never even wanted promotion? Being so popular with the low-levels with his sense of comradery probably wouldn't have him itching to move up above them. I suppose he'd be content in his own strength. Hell, maybe even that team spirit itself was what was holding back the decision.
That goes against the Saiyan spirit. Seems very unlikely IMO.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:52 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:It was said a lot of times throught the earliest of the series in a cooky way that Goku had lost his Saiyan-instinctual programming after he hit his head and thus had to relearn everything eventually taking on the empathy of kind humans thinking he himself was human. Raditz even tries to force Goku to remember his instinctual need for superiority but Goku cant fight it in him to oppress people.
Yes, because Goku was taught to be evil. We also don't know to what extent he was evil. When he lost his memories, he was taught to be good from Son Gohan.
He wasnt "taught" to be "evil" he just lost his barbaric instinct from his head trauma, his personality was altered giving Gohan the chance to properly domesticate him. During his recovery he still retained his Saiyan need for self-preservation, he just learned how to control his need for battle through martial arts discipline and was taught to value other things like How his Grandpa taught him to treat girls nicely. He learned empathy, which sayians culturally lacked. It took vegeta at least 10 years to fully understand it and accept it as a strength.
Marco Polo wrote:
Ryuman wrote:Maybe Bardock never even wanted promotion? Being so popular with the low-levels with his sense of comradery probably wouldn't have him itching to move up above them. I suppose he'd be content in his own strength. Hell, maybe even that team spirit itself was what was holding back the decision.
That goes against the Saiyan spirit. Seems very unlikely IMO.
If his chance at promotion was really a choice, I'd assume that he declined for his loyalty to his friends. I mean hes partnered in a life-group with his best bud, why would he want to leave? Theres also the chance that he'd choose to be a low-class because hes already settled as one and doesnt care.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
Gozar
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:18 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by Gozar » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:14 pm

I don't really see the problem with Goku being depicted as two years old. Who's to say that it didn't take Goku's space pod two years to land on earth? It took Vegeta and Nappa nearly a year to arrive from wherever they were. Two years isn't too hard to believe. As for Goku appearing to be a child, that can easily be chalked up to him sleeping in the space pod the entire time without normal nutrition (Presuming whatever he was hooked up to is bare bones). Also, Goku's appearance is that of a small child up until at least the age of 15, so what's to say that when he landed on earth he wasn't just a two year old that looked like an infant?

User avatar
MDSTSSJ
Regular
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:19 am

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by MDSTSSJ » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:19 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote: [*]According to Toriyama, Saiyans get promoted in ranks, but while Bardock was very strong for a low-class, he wasn't strong enough to get a promotion, meaning that his battle power can't be at nearly 10.000, as it's stated in the TV Special.[/list]
This is crazy! In the TV special, is stated that Bardock have a power of nearly 10.000 and that can not be changed even if Toriyama now implies otherwise!

Kaboom's explanation fits way better: " Toriyama only strictly says that Bardock never was "promoted," not that he never got strong enough to be. If Bardock spent most of his time out on missions one after another and gained strength rapidly in the process, the opportunity for promotion may simply have never occurred "
Last edited by MDSTSSJ on Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MDSTSSJ
Regular
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:19 am

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by MDSTSSJ » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:26 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote: [*]Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods has Planet Vegeta destroyed 39 years ago, and Goku is 41 years old, while the TV Special gives Planet Vegeta's destruction & Goku's birth the same date. It also shows Vegeta as a kid having the same hairstyle he has as an adult, instead of having a different hairstyle as the TV Special shows.
I think BoG is wrong on that. Planet Vegeta was destroyed at the same period ( month, week, days ) that Goku was born.

User avatar
Gozar
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1172
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:18 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by Gozar » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:29 pm

MDSTSSJ wrote:This is crazy! In the TV special, is stated that Bardock have a power of 10.000 and that can not be changed even if Toriyama now implies otherwise!
I agree with this. Just like when Toei contradicts Toriyama and we write things off as "just filler," I feel that Bardock is not really Toriyama's character. He took Toei's character and made it a part of his own story without truly contradicting anything directly. Unless Toriyama were to come out and say that the Bardock in his story has a Battle Power of X, I find no reason to throw away what the TVSP said.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:42 pm

MDSTSSJ wrote:I think BoG is wrong on that. Planet Vegeta was destroyed at the same period ( month, week, days ) that Goku was born.
In the anime, yes. In the manga alone, which is pretty much all Toriyama seems to concern himself with, is the works he had a real part in writing, it's never specified when exactly Vegeta was destroyed until Jaco and Battle of Gods. Freeza gave a year during his arc (wasn't it 30 years, even though Goku was only 25?), but that seems more like and estimate since it doesn't line up with any of the other dates at all.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:45 pm

TheGmGoken wrote:Your first two points should just be one. I mean I DID say change Goku's age. Which means Goku got sent out the same day the planet was destroyed.
You can't just change Goku's age. Goku was either 0 years old baby or a 2 year old boy. There is a big difference.
TheGmGoken wrote:Same way Vegeta hair is sometimes Brown or Purple instead of Black. A hairstyle really should't be counted as a contradiction. More or less a different style drawing.
Different style or not, it contradicts what we see in BoG, what we see in the Kanzenban spine art, and what Vegeta says in the manga about Saiyan hair.

The third point has been theorize by Kaboom:
Kaboom wrote:I wouldn't jump to conclusions about this so quickly -- Toriyama only strictly says that Bardock never was "promoted," not that he never got strong enough to be. If Bardock spent most of his time out on missions one after another and gained strength rapidly in the process, the opportunity for promotion may simply have never occurred.

I'm having flashbacks to the early parts of "part two" of Naruto, where Naruto himself returns to the village to find that most (if not all) of his peers have been promoted to Chunin level or higher, while Naruto himself is still technically a Genin in rank despite being stronger than most of them. I can easily picture something similar being the case with Bardock.
This make sense if you look at Bardock's workload.[/quote]
I disagree. Toriyama was asked about Bardock's battle power, and he says that even though he was strong, he was still a low class, meaning that his battle power wasn't mid class level.
SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:He wasnt "taught" to be "evil" he just lost his barbaric instinct from his head trauma, his personality was altered giving Gohan the chance to properly domesticate him. During his recovery he still retained his Saiyan need for self-preservation, he just learned how to control his need for battle through martial arts discipline and was taught to value other things like How his Grandpa taught him to treat girls nicely. He learned empathy, which sayians culturally lacked. It took vegeta at least 10 years to fully understand it and accept it as a strength.
What instinct? Goku knew how to fight when he arrived on Earth, which means that he was educated about how to fight and how to behave.
MDSTSSJ wrote:I think BoG is wrong on that. Planet Vegeta was destroyed at the same period ( month, week, days ) that Goku was born.
But you opinion & Toei's TV Special contradict Toriyama's Jaco, and I place Toriyama above Toei or fans when it comes to the manga. What you say applies to the anime, not to the manga.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:48 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Different style or not, it contradicts what we see in BoG, what we see in the Kanzenban spine art, and what Vegeta says in the manga about Saiyan hair.
It doesn't contradict anything about the actual hair growth, or lack of. Their hair just doesn't keep growing like ours would, it reaches that specific length and stops. Toriyama has confirmed that their hair style can change with age, and that's how Nappa went bald.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Goku's mother...appearing soon?!

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Sun Feb 02, 2014 10:03 pm

JulieYBM wrote:I'm not particularly fond of Gine being 'kind' of any sort. I think that waters down what makes the Saiyans so great. Now, if she was K'Ehleyr from Star Trek: The Next Generation, that would be awesome.
dbzfan7 wrote:It makes me question if Toriyama even remembers how Goku became a good person.
I dont like it ethier, it undermines the original symbolic meaning of what Bardock represented in his charactization. It wasn't about wether sayians were good or evil, they were soldiers harded by loyalty and valued it above anything else being the only ethic they had. It was alsso about Bardock realizing that he was going to pay for his sins as a apathist and bare witness to his own genocide in bad karma but still fighting to change his ethics.
I don't know where all this corny pure-hearted, destined to be an "Ally to Good; nightmare to evil" concept keeps coming from as the true advantage in Goku suddenly comes from now suggesting that Goku wasn't a good person because he was unlike the other sayians by his beliefs, but a good person only because he inherited it just like his SSJ power... now it was Goku's destiny rather than something he was rewarded for because he stuck to his beliefs.
DBZGTKOSDH wrote: What instinct? Goku knew how to fight when he arrived on Earth, which means that he was educated about how to fight and how to behave..
No he wasnt. He was a baby on planet Vegeta, physically unable to fight and was a baby when Gohan picks him up and names him. he had no education on anything human babies lacked. His "Saiyan instinct" is the horomonal force that drives their infants to be harder to raise as they are as Goku was described tempermental and deeloped physically faster. Despite it Goku was wild but untrained. He only learned how to fight correctly through his Grandpa a martial artist.
Compared to Vegeta, Turles, Nappa and Broly - Goku is the only fighter who has form, technique and understanding of meditation. Thus WHY hes always superior to Vegeta.
TheDevilsCorpse wrote:
DBZGTKOSDH wrote:Different style or not, it contradicts what we see in BoG, what we see in the Kanzenban spine art, and what Vegeta says in the manga about Saiyan hair.
It doesn't contradict anything about the actual hair growth, or lack of. Their hair just doesn't keep growing like ours would, it reaches that specific length and stops. Toriyama has confirmed that their hair style can change with age, and that's how Nappa went bald.
Its the one dub error that was totally lost in translation among the fanbase, most people actually think Raditz was born with his mane and that sayians having mustaches is a plothole.
Last edited by SingleFringe&Sparks on Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

Post Reply