Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
dbzfan7 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
You could apply this to soooo many Dragon Ball concepts and ideas right now
There are things now with no answers that only the audience could create some explanation (or we should hope Dragon Ball S answers at least some of them).
Doctor. wrote:This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
You could apply this to soooo many Dragon Ball concepts and ideas right now
You could apply that concepts and idea stemming from manga, as well.
Spoiler:
Akira Toriyama wrote:My policy is to try and forget things once they’re over. Since if I don’t discard the old and focus on what’s new, I’ll overload my brain capacity. I still haven’t lived down going, “Who the heck is Tao Pai-pai?” that one time I was talking with Ei’ichiro Oda-kun. But the fact that there are still people reading the series after all this time… All I can say is; “thank you.” Really, that’s all.
Akira Toriyama wrote:Drawing Dragon Ball again reminded me of two things--how much I love it, and how much I never want to do it again.
Kunzait_83 wrote:And if you're upset because all this new material completely invalidates the tabletop RPG rulebook-sized statistical system and flowchart for the characters' "canonical Power Levels" that you'd been working on painstakingly for the last bunch of years now... well I don't think there's a kind, non-blunt way of saying this, but that's 100% entirely your own misguided fault for buying so deeply into all this nonsensical garbage in the first place. And that you also have IMMENSELY skewed and comically backwards priorities in what you think is most important and needed to make a good Dragon Ball story.
Zephyr wrote:Goodness, they wrote idiotic drivel in a children's cartoon meant to advertise toys!? Again!? For the ninetieth episode in a row!? Somebody stop the presses! We have to voice our concern over these Super important issues!
Kamiccolo9 wrote:Fair enough, I concede. Sean Schemmel probably has some kind of hidden talent. Maybe he is an expert at Minesweeper. You're right; calling him "talentless" wasn't fair.
Michsi wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:29 amIn Super Piccolo got yelled off the stage by Vegeta in the U6 Tournament arc and lost to Jiminy Cricket in the ToP , he deserved 15 new transformations with his theme song played by Metallica in the background.
dbzfan7 wrote:So then pretty much every other person who writes Dragon Ball can be as consistent or inconsistent too since they were given rights to do pretty much whatever they want. Such as GT, Toei Movies, Specials, etc. Though of course Toriyama doesn't have to be consistent as it's his work....even though people will go to drastic length's to pretend he totally is being consistent.
People are calling out Toriyama for this inconsistency/plothole. It's just that's it's so insignificant in the grand scheme of things, there's no point in really ragging on him for it. Dragon Ball has always been consistently inconsistent. Why are you acting as if people have never pointed out the inconsistencies ever since Toriyama started writing and drawing Dragon Ball all those years ago?
No the issue is people jump to defend everything he does whether consistent or not, but for pretty everything he doesn't do people are fine with just bashing it. Just look at GT. I don't see many people giving GT much theory treatment or explaining away all it's issues. Big or small.
Lord Beerus wrote:
dbzfan7 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
You could apply this to soooo many Dragon Ball concepts and ideas right now
You could apply that concepts and idea stemming from manga, as well.
Your point? We don't give the manga free passes either. Maybe you do.
Dyno wrote:
Doctor. wrote:Woah woah woah, hold up there.
This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
dbzfan7 wrote:
Doctor. wrote:This is [i}not[/i] how story-telling works. The author gives the explanation, not the audience.
You could apply this to soooo many Dragon Ball concepts and ideas right now
There are things now with no answers that only the audience could create some explanation (or we should hope Dragon Ball S answers at least some of them).
I don't think Dragon Ball is the kind of open to interpretation kind of story. Pretty much everything is spelled out and kept simple. I mean Toriyama is all about simple.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Doctor. wrote:I've explained before, I'll just paraphrase myself.
Power levels establish tension and drama. People who care about them (well, people who care about them in a narrative) don't care about the big numbers or the fancy explosions. If you have character A who's so much above character B, who's the main character, you're gonna be left wondering how in the hell character B, the character we're supposed to care and root for, is going to escape the situation or overcome the odds. It makes us emotionally invested.
If character B doesn't escape the situation in a believable way that's consistent with previous events, then that emotional investment is gone. It was pointless tension, pointless drama made just to suck in the viewer. It has no critical value whatsoever. The audience is left believing that the author can just create whatever scenarios he wants and what happens to the characters is decided by whatever the author wants to happen, regardless of the events that happened in the story. Which, in fairness, is what happens, but the audience wants to be fooled. The audience wants to know that the world they're following has rules. That the world they're invested in isn't going to bend to external factors that are irrelevant to them.
An author can do whatever he wants with the characters, that's not false. But the author should also have the responsibility to make sure it fits in cohesively with the other events in the narrative he has created.
No? You don't use your ideas to explain the end of Dragon Ball GT? You, at some point, didn't use your ideas of what could happen after end of Z, ignoring GT?
Before Kanzenshuu cover it, the "ressurection limit of one year" was pretty much up to interpretation, the way I see it now.
Toriyama can do everything cuz he's the author?
Wow, can't believe he actually said that.
Very well then, however, this means that everybody else can do whatever the fuck they want too.
So there's no longer any reason to critize fanfictions, GT, Toei Movies, Funimation dub etc.
Flame Dragon wrote:Toriyama can do everything cuz he's the author?
Wow, can't believe he actually said that.
Yes, I believe the creator of Dragon Ball can make a claim like that, since he's, you know, the creator of Dragon Ball.
Spoiler:
Akira Toriyama wrote:My policy is to try and forget things once they’re over. Since if I don’t discard the old and focus on what’s new, I’ll overload my brain capacity. I still haven’t lived down going, “Who the heck is Tao Pai-pai?” that one time I was talking with Ei’ichiro Oda-kun. But the fact that there are still people reading the series after all this time… All I can say is; “thank you.” Really, that’s all.
Akira Toriyama wrote:Drawing Dragon Ball again reminded me of two things--how much I love it, and how much I never want to do it again.
Kunzait_83 wrote:And if you're upset because all this new material completely invalidates the tabletop RPG rulebook-sized statistical system and flowchart for the characters' "canonical Power Levels" that you'd been working on painstakingly for the last bunch of years now... well I don't think there's a kind, non-blunt way of saying this, but that's 100% entirely your own misguided fault for buying so deeply into all this nonsensical garbage in the first place. And that you also have IMMENSELY skewed and comically backwards priorities in what you think is most important and needed to make a good Dragon Ball story.
Zephyr wrote:Goodness, they wrote idiotic drivel in a children's cartoon meant to advertise toys!? Again!? For the ninetieth episode in a row!? Somebody stop the presses! We have to voice our concern over these Super important issues!
Kamiccolo9 wrote:Fair enough, I concede. Sean Schemmel probably has some kind of hidden talent. Maybe he is an expert at Minesweeper. You're right; calling him "talentless" wasn't fair.
Michsi wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:29 amIn Super Piccolo got yelled off the stage by Vegeta in the U6 Tournament arc and lost to Jiminy Cricket in the ToP , he deserved 15 new transformations with his theme song played by Metallica in the background.
Flame Dragon wrote:Toriyama can do everything cuz he's the author?
Wow, can't believe he actually said that.
Very well then, however, this means that everybody else can do whatever the fuck they want too.
So there's no longer any reason to critize fanfictions, GT, Toei Movies, Funimation dub etc.
It is simply property law. Something people always fail to realize. Both Akira Toriyama and Toei are allowed to make official stories of Dragon Ball so of course they can do such things. As for fanfictions, yes, it can also be used to compare and say that you don't need to take it that serious. But that's about it.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
Flame Dragon wrote:Very well then, however, this means that everybody else can do whatever the fuck they want too.
So there's no longer any reason to critize fanfictions, GT, Toei Movies, Funimation dub etc.
Can we stop with the utterly ridiculous lapses in logic. That's not how things work, and it's exceptionally tiring to read.
Here's what Toriyama said, with the key elements highlighted:
It’s really embarrassing to have this called a “screenplay”. It’d probably be more accurate to say it’s just a memo. It’s simply something I idly dashed off for the staff, just to help explain the flow of the story and the dialogue! Never in a million years did I think it would get published. If any of you are trying to become scriptwriters, please don’t use this as an example!!
I guess you could say that some things are difficult for anyone but the original author to write, because only the original author can freely mess around with what’s already been established. A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story, so in that respect they’d probably have a harder time messing around with things.
Then there’s the dialogue. The original author knows each character’s personality and backstory, so they can naturally think up dialogue that suits them.
This is Toriyama's work; everything he has ever penned is freely alterable at his discretion. That's a very different scenario from unsanctioned changes made by third parties.
Regardless, nobody is saying you have to like what he does, but how on earth do you come to the conclusion that anyone can freely alter his work just because he decided to?!
Let's stop with the 'senile' implications and general badmouthing. You can criticise something without being offensive. You'll find more people listen and take you seriously that way, too.
Flame Dragon wrote:Very well then, however, this means that everybody else can do whatever the fuck they want too.
So there's no longer any reason to critize fanfictions, GT, Toei Movies, Funimation dub etc.
Can we stop with the utterly ridiculous lapses in logic. That's not how things work, and it's exceptionally tiring to read.
Here's what Toriyama said, with the key elements highlighted:
It’s really embarrassing to have this called a “screenplay”. It’d probably be more accurate to say it’s just a memo. It’s simply something I idly dashed off for the staff, just to help explain the flow of the story and the dialogue! Never in a million years did I think it would get published. If any of you are trying to become scriptwriters, please don’t use this as an example!!
I guess you could say that some things are difficult for anyone but the original author to write, because only the original author can freely mess around with what’s already been established. A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story, so in that respect they’d probably have a harder time messing around with things.
Then there’s the dialogue. The original author knows each character’s personality and backstory, so they can naturally think up dialogue that suits them.
This is Toriyama's work; everything he has ever penned is freely alterable at his discretion. That's a very different scenario from unsanctioned changes made by third parties.
Regardless, nobody is saying you have to like what he does, but how on earth do you come to the conclusion that anyone can freely alter his work just because he decided to?!
Let's stop with the 'senile' implications and general badmouthing. You can criticise something without being offensive. You'll find more people listen and take you seriously that way, too.
Yes but if he can mess with what is ESTABLISHED by him 20 years ago and he doesn't follow the continuity then officially he stated that there isn't a continuity.
Dragon Ball Heroes God Mission = Best sets of missions so far
Doctor. wrote:Besides Bulma knowing about Freeza and vice-versa and Hell getting retconned, which ones?
- 4 Months of training to reach God-level
- God-level can be reached with training, instead of Magical means (like the Ritual)
- Goku personality. He was cocky before but never so cocky. That was Vegeta shtick. - Freeza remembering Bulma (HUGE PLOTHOLE)
- Shenron reviving Freeza in pieces. (guess then Namek Krillin should have been revived as dust then lol)
- Vegeta being a pussy against Freeza until he was weakened by Goku. Even tho Vegeta never was scared of opponents and instead kept charging head in even when he was clearly outmatched.
- Gohan and Piccolo needing more than 3 seconds to obliterate the 1000 soldiers.
- The stupid ring of Sorbet.
- Gohan losing SSJ2 (WTF) and Ultimate in such a short time from BOG. Might as well kill him if you're going to treat the character like shit, Toriyama.
And this is not mentioning the recolor fest.
I can't believe his editor was impressed with this shit. This is just a fanfiction made movie
If this is the way the writing is gonna be from now on, my excitement for Dragon Ball Super will be nonexistant.
Might as well watch GT, it might have less plotholes even lmao.
Whoa drama queen. The only plothole there is Freeza remembering Bulma and its not that huge.
You don't even know what plothole means. Doesn't surprise me the series is full of plotholes then, if you call that everytime you don't like what's happening.
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.
Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota
So what is Toriyama saying then. That he can mess with the timeline and facts just cause his the author? That makes little to ZERO sense. It is the other authors that have the ability to do this(like DC/Marvel comics in general) that change the continuity of their original work. So what is the deal? Does this mean that he is going to retcon his original work out of existence?
Dragon Ball Heroes God Mission = Best sets of missions so far
Flame Dragon wrote:Very well then, however, this means that everybody else can do whatever the fuck they want too.
So there's no longer any reason to critize fanfictions, GT, Toei Movies, Funimation dub etc.
Can we stop with the utterly ridiculous lapses in logic. That's not how things work, and it's exceptionally tiring to read.
Here's what Toriyama said, with the key elements highlighted:
It’s really embarrassing to have this called a “screenplay”. It’d probably be more accurate to say it’s just a memo. It’s simply something I idly dashed off for the staff, just to help explain the flow of the story and the dialogue! Never in a million years did I think it would get published. If any of you are trying to become scriptwriters, please don’t use this as an example!!
I guess you could say that some things are difficult for anyone but the original author to write, because only the original author can freely mess around with what’s already been established. A scriptwriter would get tied up trying not to screw with the original story, so in that respect they’d probably have a harder time messing around with things.
Then there’s the dialogue. The original author knows each character’s personality and backstory, so they can naturally think up dialogue that suits them.
This is Toriyama's work; everything he has ever penned is freely alterable at his discretion. That's a very different scenario from unsanctioned changes made by third parties.
Regardless, nobody is saying you have to like what he does, but how on earth do you come to the conclusion that anyone can freely alter his work just because he decided to?!
Let's stop with the 'senile' implications and general badmouthing. You can criticise something without being offensive. You'll find more people listen and take you seriously that way, too.
Yes but if he can mess with what is ESTABLISHED by him 20 years ago and he doesn't follow the continuity then officially he stated that there isn't a continuity.
Apparently Freeza saying he remembered Bulma has just destroyed continuity.
Good Lord.
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It’s when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what." - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (1960)
“I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.” - Nelson Mandela
Whoever Toriyama has given creative control can totally do what ever they want and mess around with what's been established. So long as he gave them the go ahead and freedom to make whatever they want. Toriyama doesn't have to fear as much being consistent cause he's the creator, so he can do whatever he wants since he started it all. Toei and others who he's handed over creative control also can pretty much do this too as they've been given the rights to make what they want.
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!
Spoiler:
Doctor. wrote:I've explained before, I'll just paraphrase myself.
Power levels establish tension and drama. People who care about them (well, people who care about them in a narrative) don't care about the big numbers or the fancy explosions. If you have character A who's so much above character B, who's the main character, you're gonna be left wondering how in the hell character B, the character we're supposed to care and root for, is going to escape the situation or overcome the odds. It makes us emotionally invested.
If character B doesn't escape the situation in a believable way that's consistent with previous events, then that emotional investment is gone. It was pointless tension, pointless drama made just to suck in the viewer. It has no critical value whatsoever. The audience is left believing that the author can just create whatever scenarios he wants and what happens to the characters is decided by whatever the author wants to happen, regardless of the events that happened in the story. Which, in fairness, is what happens, but the audience wants to be fooled. The audience wants to know that the world they're following has rules. That the world they're invested in isn't going to bend to external factors that are irrelevant to them.
An author can do whatever he wants with the characters, that's not false. But the author should also have the responsibility to make sure it fits in cohesively with the other events in the narrative he has created.
GoldLiger wrote:So what is Toriyama saying then. That he can mess with the timeline and facts just cause his the author? That makes little to ZERO sense. It is the other authors that have the ability to do this(like DC/Marvel comics in general) that change the continuity of their original work. So what is the deal? Does this mean that he is going to retcon his original work out of existence?
It makes all sense. I can retcon whatever I want or make plotholes whenever I want in a story that is mine. So can he.
Last edited by Cetra on Sun May 03, 2015 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
GoldLiger wrote:So what is Toriyama saying then. That he can mess with the timeline and facts just cause his the author? That makes little to ZERO sense. It is the other authors that have the ability to do this(like DC/Marvel comics in general) that change the continuity of their original work. So what is the deal? Does this mean that he is going to retcon his original work out of existence?
It means that people are going to be far more critical and far less receptive of anything added by a third party than anything added or altered by the author himself. Dr. Gero, for example, has a semi-shaky retcon backstory only believable because nothing before really says he couldn't have existed. We accept it because Toriyama wrote it in.
Would we have accepted this ad, say, an anime filler writer, or someone penning a script for a movie added this in? Probably not.
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It’s when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what." - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (1960)
“I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.” - Nelson Mandela
ShadowWolf87 wrote:Apparently Freeza saying he remembered Bulma has just destroyed continuity.
Good Lord.
It was already destroyed when Mai said that she was 41 in BoG!
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Dyno wrote:No? You don't use your ideas to explain the end of Dragon Ball GT? You, at some point, didn't use your ideas of what could happen after end of Z, ignoring GT?
Before Kanzenshuu cover it, the "ressurection limit of one year" was pretty much up to interpretation, the way I see it now.
I always figured the one year limit only ever applied to Kami's Dragon Balls, as it's only ever mentioned with those. Dende's set have more power and fewer restrictions, so I just figured the one year limit may not apply or have a loophole somewhere now.
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It’s when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what." - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (1960)
“I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.” - Nelson Mandela
ShadowWolf87 wrote:Apparently Freeza saying he remembered Bulma has just destroyed continuity.
Good Lord.
It was already destroyed when Mai said that she was 41 in BoG!
Was she given a concrete age before? Is it possible she's lying about her age similar to Bulma?
"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It’s when you know you’re licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what." - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (1960)
“I learned that courage was not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear.” - Nelson Mandela
What's the difference between Toriyama deciding to change things or retcon them now versus back in serialization? Is it just your own feelings on things? Or is it something more concrete?
Like, I mean... the Red Ribbon Army was destroyed. Completely. Oh, except for Dr. Gero. And he's been doing research this whole time. Why was that OK?
I posit that it's no different at all, and people are simply approaching things with too much fandom baggage.
:: [| Mike "VegettoEX" LaBrie |] ::
:: [| Kanzenshuu - Co-Founder/Administrator, Podcast Host, News Manager (note: our "job" titles are arbitrary and meaningless) |] ::
:: [| Website: January 1998 |] :: [| Podcast: November 2005 |] :: [| Fusion: April 2012 |] :: [| Wiki: 20XX |] ::