No, Toonami just exists again. In all seriousness, I'm so happy that I'll be able to buy DBS Blu-rays soon.dragonballhero wrote:And to think, they're BOTH going to air on my childhood channel, CARTOON NETWORK! Well, Adult Swim, but you get the idea. Honestly, considering how CN has been working in recent years, I was a bit afraid it wasn't going to air there, and that they'd pull a Kai on us, and air it on Nick or something.
I feel like a kid again! Seriously, is it 1997 or something?
"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
- Jinzoningen MULE
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
- Location: Salt Mines
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Retired.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I hope we get a some more spoilers soon. I can't wait to hear about DragonBalls future
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Wasn't the lack of new characters and transformation exactly what hurt Dragonball Kai's merchandising though?DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
And, really, the only characters who 'benefit' from staying in the gap of 10 years are Trunks and Goten. Goku and Vegeta would continue to be basically the same afterwards. So, I don't see what exactly taking place at this point adds.
There's the old matter of Kuririn and Bulma looking too old in the epilogue, but when we have the Pillaf Gang walking around as kids I don't see why aging is even considered an issue.
-
GodKaio-Ken
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2016 6:00 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Its not "necessary"DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
Currently watching: My Hero Academia
Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter
Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"
Last watched: Akame Ga Kill, Hokuto No Ken, Hokuto No Ken 2, Hunter X Hunter
Quote if I were to Hakai someone: "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Hakai!"
- ChronoTwigger
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:45 pm
- Location: PizzaLand
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.GodKaio-Ken wrote:Its not "necessary"DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
I learned english listening to songs. So I don't know anything about. The day you had to learn play piano by just listening .mp3, you'll understand.
- TekTheNinja
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I think it should happen. Hell, I think Super should have STARTED after EoZ, but I feel like they won't go past it even though I so desperately want them to. Toriyama seems intent on keeping EoZ as the ending to the franchise.GodKaio-Ken wrote:Its not "necessary"DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
It was pretty damn mandatory for Gohan, Z's main character, and to say there wasn't growth with the characters in DB is just a lie.ChronoTwigger wrote: Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.
I kinda take a little bit of issue with it being on Toonami actually because they air episodes so god damn infrequently.Jinzoningen MULE wrote:And to think, they're BOTH going to air on my childhood channel, CARTOON NETWORK! Well, Adult Swim, but you get the idea. Honestly, considering how CN has been working in recent years, I was a bit afraid it wasn't going to air there, and that they'd pull a Kai on us, and air it on Nick or something.
I feel like a kid again! Seriously, is it 1997 or something?
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Db hadn't set a precedent yet. It was something people didn't know they wanted. DB and DBZ has already set a precedent for this so people want it now that they know how beneficial it can be. Honestly, I don't really care if a timeskip will happen or not. I do think one will happen though.ChronoTwigger wrote:Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.GodKaio-Ken wrote:Its not "necessary"DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
- TekTheNinja
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 11:36 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
But DB DID have growth, it just wasn't physical growth for the most part. One problem in Super is that characters can't really develop at all because they have to be the same as they were in EoZ.kinisking wrote:Db hadn't set a precedent yet. It was something people didn't know they wanted. DB and DBZ has already set a precedent for this so people want it now that they know how beneficial it can be. Honestly, I don't really care if a timeskip will happen or not. I do think one will happen though.ChronoTwigger wrote:Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.GodKaio-Ken wrote:
Its not "necessary"
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
- ChronoTwigger
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1225
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:45 pm
- Location: PizzaLand
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
What I'm trying to say is that having Goku growing up the first time was well received by fan. Enough for the series to propose a time skip each arc. But that's not a mandatory element for the story or franchise progress, and the whole thing could have stopped after Cell defeat or even before, focusing on strict timeframes as Super did. From a technical point, another series could focus in the timeframe from Cell defeat to Buu, if not by having the risk of going overboard with powerups that doersn't fit. Growing up is nice, but not strictly necessary.TekTheNinja wrote:I think it should happen. Hell, I think Super should have STARTED after EoZ, but I feel like they won't go past it even though I so desperately want them to. Toriyama seems intent on keeping EoZ as the ending to the franchise.GodKaio-Ken wrote:Its not "necessary"DBZ Macky wrote:If Ash Ketchum is still 10 years old, then I fail to see why it is necessary for DBS to surpass EoZ to sell more merch.
In fact, I feel that the Buu arc characters are more iconic and it will be a better business move to stay in the timeframe between Buu and EoZ.
Its just that a lot of people are already put off by the lack of aging and time passing. Also it changes the type of series Dragon Ball is entirely when you take out the passage of time.
Dragon Ball in its basic form is about growth. Its hard to convey that in Super without time.
It was pretty damn mandatory for Gohan, Z's main character, and to say there wasn't growth with the characters in DB is just a lie.ChronoTwigger wrote: Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.
I learned english listening to songs. So I don't know anything about. The day you had to learn play piano by just listening .mp3, you'll understand.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Very exciting news for the dub! Sadly, we won't be reaching new content until around June/July.
Now if only we had info of the LatAm dub... still waiting Toei...
I'm surprised they are airing Buu Kai along with Super though, but I guess that's for the better.
Now if only we had info of the LatAm dub... still waiting Toei...
I'm surprised they are airing Buu Kai along with Super though, but I guess that's for the better.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I liked the new ending song, never thought I would despise an ending more than Yoka Yoka Dance but that Chahan Music is worse
Funny, that I started to enjoy more this ending because of BlackJaetinh wrote:So much BETTER than the last few endings. Light Pink is still my favorite ending but this one is great too. I really hope Yamamuro (?) will do this song justice.
乃亜
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Dragon Ball: The Others Discussion Thread
Are we too old to enjoy new Dragon Ball movies/series?
Spoiler:
- dbs fanboy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 4:08 pm
- Location: Spain
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Even the RoF ones?Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I'm so happy that I'll be able to buy DBS Blu-rays soon.
I really miss ma boy, Black

dbgtFO wrote:
dbgtFO wrote:
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
That's not really true. We barely saw anyone's personality in EOZ.TekTheNinja wrote:But DB DID have growth, it just wasn't physical growth for the most part. One problem in Super is that characters can't really develop at all because they have to be the same as they were in EoZ.kinisking wrote:Db hadn't set a precedent yet. It was something people didn't know they wanted. DB and DBZ has already set a precedent for this so people want it now that they know how beneficial it can be. Honestly, I don't really care if a timeskip will happen or not. I do think one will happen though.ChronoTwigger wrote: Correct, but not entirely. Time passage wasn't a mandatory element, just a nice one, that many fan want to happen again just for a refresh. DB was all about a kid the whole time and no one asked for a time skip.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Guys it says season 1 will be 26 episodes, however those first two story arcs comprise of 27 episodes according to wikipedia. Anyone else notice this or am I missing something.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I think that's just the way funimation does things. A lot of their "seasons" for long shows like this are 26 episodes long. At least that's what I've gathered from the DVD's I have. A lot of those seasons end in really weird places as well.nato25 wrote:Guys it says season 1 will be 26 episodes, however those first two story arcs comprise of 27 episodes according to wikipedia. Anyone else notice this or am I missing something.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
But the death of Freeza is episode 27 lol that would certainly be weird. I'm not saying they wont be ready to go straight into the 'next season' to end it properly but that's very strange.
- Psykomatik
- Regular
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:37 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
It's normal. When FUNimation / Kazé / AB buy a season, they got 26 episodes delivered.
The next batch of 26 episodes will come when they will get another season for another TV deal.
The next batch of 26 episodes will come when they will get another season for another TV deal.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Ahh ok, fair enough.Psykomatik wrote:It's normal. When FUNimation / Kazé / AB buy a season, they got 26 episodes delivered.
The next batch of 26 episodes will come when they will get another season for another TV deal.
- Jinzoningen MULE
- I Live Here
- Posts: 4405
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:33 pm
- Location: Salt Mines
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I'll be skipping those, just like I did with Kai. No need to own 2 of the exact same thing, especially so when the version that I don't own is irredeemably worse.dbs fanboy wrote:Even the RoF ones?Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I'm so happy that I'll be able to buy DBS Blu-rays soon.
Retired.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I think db does have a stage this year. Looks like it will be named Dragon ball room booth.Chuquita wrote:Anyone know when at Jump Festa they're going to announce the teaser info for the next arc? Dragon Ball doesn't have a stage this year.
http://www.jumpfesta.com/shueisha/dragonball/







