- I get a new Ferarri on Monday
- I am the best
Vic Mignogna
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
Re: Vic Mignogna
From what I could gather on social media it seems Vic may be serving legal papers on Monday. I guess that could be true.
Doesn’t really change my stance on anything. Just because Vic decides to sue doesn’t mean I think he is innocent (although I am sure many will try to claim that) .
Edit:
Wow just watched that video. What a sick human being. And this is who people claim is a “legitimate” source
And yes it does sound like Blackmail. But I am sure Nick’s cronies will deny it.
And again this is who Vic is friends with
Doesn’t really change my stance on anything. Just because Vic decides to sue doesn’t mean I think he is innocent (although I am sure many will try to claim that) .
Edit:
Cursed Lemon wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:45 pm I feel like blackmail is an offense you could probably get disbarred for.
Look at this fucking drama queen trash pile of a human being.
https://youtu.be/uR3Gns71O5I
Wow just watched that video. What a sick human being. And this is who people claim is a “legitimate” source
And yes it does sound like Blackmail. But I am sure Nick’s cronies will deny it.
And again this is who Vic is friends with
Re: Vic Mignogna
This is the guy the alt-right dorks worship? A two-bit lawyer from the middle of nowhere, who live-streams his drunken rants and publicly threatens people in front of a Warhammer flag?
That was absolutely painful. People take this clown seriously? For a legal professional, that kind of behaviour is bound to catch up with him. His like four clients might want to look into other counsel.
That was absolutely painful. People take this clown seriously? For a legal professional, that kind of behaviour is bound to catch up with him. His like four clients might want to look into other counsel.
- Cursed Lemon
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:29 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Contact:
Re: Vic Mignogna
This is what all alt-right pundits look like.
Special Beam Cannon!
(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃
(゚Д゚)σ 弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌弌⊃
Re: Vic Mignogna
Wow.
Can't believe I would actually spend time reading through a thousand and half pages.
I won't share my opinion about it, since now coming to the last page, I realize much have already been said.
Anyway, I'm surprise that Doctor. has been banned for good. Sure the guy had some questionable marks about all this case, things that I fully disagree, but he is a member that contributes a lot with the discussion regarding the franchise as a whole. Don't know if he had received strikes before, but a temporary ban could have been enough.
Can't believe I would actually spend time reading through a thousand and half pages.
I won't share my opinion about it, since now coming to the last page, I realize much have already been said.
Anyway, I'm surprise that Doctor. has been banned for good. Sure the guy had some questionable marks about all this case, things that I fully disagree, but he is a member that contributes a lot with the discussion regarding the franchise as a whole. Don't know if he had received strikes before, but a temporary ban could have been enough.
Tell that to Rocketman.Kamiccolo9 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:22 pm Doctor is hardly the longest-serving member to get banned from here. The mod team isn't big on preferential treatment.
Re: Vic Mignogna
If this is such a controversial topic that your opinion can get you banned, maybe the topic as a whole should be closed down.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
Re: Vic Mignogna
Saying "it's just an opinion though" doesn't mean it's an okay stance to take. "Opinions" can be anything, and if it informs your actions you better fucking believe that dangerous and wrong opinions to have should be vetted. This is just an online forum, if you get banned it's a chance to look at both yourself and the forum you were communicating on and learn to actually behave. The mods did nothing that they weren't in their rights to do, and what they have done has been almost universally justified. I'm honestly surprised more people haven't been banned.
Also, they've explained multiple times how a topic on an ongoing current event related to Dragon Ball should be kept open. If your response is to do something stupid that gets you banned, it's not the topic's fault.
Also, they've explained multiple times how a topic on an ongoing current event related to Dragon Ball should be kept open. If your response is to do something stupid that gets you banned, it's not the topic's fault.
Re: Vic Mignogna
If the only thing that's going to result from a topic, especially one not even related to the franchise, is a divide in the fanbase and discussions not going anywhere, then closing it is the best option. If the topic needs to be open then either allow people to voice their opinions (as long as they're not attacking anyone personally) or close it temporarily until more information is available.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
- Polyphase Avatron
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am
Re: Vic Mignogna
If the division is between those who support sexual predators and those who don't, then it seems to me that identifying and banning the former is a good thing.sintzu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:23 amIf the only thing that's going to result from a topic, especially one not even related to the franchise, is a divide in the fanbase and discussions not going anywhere, then closing it is the best option. If the topic needs to be open then either allow people to voice their opinions (as long as they're not attacking anyone personally) or close it temporarily until more information is available.
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147
- Fionordequester
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2878
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:33 pm
Re: Vic Mignogna
Huh... Well I learned something new... All this talk about Sexual Assault? Well, it turns out, Texas doesn't technically define groping, or other forms of unwanted sexual contact as sexual assault, per say...
https://twitter.com/Lakas1236547/status ... 3596440579
Instead, it's just plain old "Assault"...
So Vic Mignogna wasn't allegedly sexually assault those girls. He was just allegedly doing a REGULAR assaulting, that's all. And unfortunately, some folks are putting a lot of emphasis on the difference between the two... So I guess be careful? Aye carumba...
https://twitter.com/Lakas1236547/status ... 3596440579
Instead, it's just plain old "Assault"...
So Vic Mignogna wasn't allegedly sexually assault those girls. He was just allegedly doing a REGULAR assaulting, that's all. And unfortunately, some folks are putting a lot of emphasis on the difference between the two... So I guess be careful? Aye carumba...
Kataphrut wrote:It's a bit of a Boy Who Cried Wolf situation to me...Basically, the boy shouldn't have cried wolf when the wolves just wanted to Go See Yamcha. If not, they might have gotten some help when the wolves came back to Make the Donuts.
Chuquita wrote:I liken Gokû Black to "guy can't stand his job, so instead of quitting and finding a job he likes, he instead sets fire not only to his workplace so he doesn't have to work there, but tries setting fire to every store in the franchise of that company".
- KBABZ
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5180
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 9:38 pm
- Location: The tallest tower in West City
Re: Vic Mignogna
Yeah, because assault sounds SOOO much better on your resume. And that would only apply to the examples in Texas, anyway.Fionordequester wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:06 am So Vic Mignogna wasn't allegedly sexually assault those girls. He was just allegedly doing a REGULAR assaulting, that's all. And unfortunately, some folks are putting a lot of emphasis on the difference between the two... So I guess be careful? Aye carumba...
Re: Vic Mignogna
There's also the "intentional and knowingly" part toi, so if he's telling the truth and wasn't aware what he was doing was considered assault, then he technically didn't commit assault either according to Texas law.
Looking for these rare items/information:
Any information or recordings pertaining to Dragon Ball Z's syndicated run on WAWB
Any information regarding the stations that carried the origin Dragon Ball in the USA
Dragon Box (any deals would be nice)
Shonen Jumps with Dragon Ball in them
Any information or recordings pertaining to Dragon Ball Z's syndicated run on WAWB
Any information regarding the stations that carried the origin Dragon Ball in the USA
Dragon Box (any deals would be nice)
Shonen Jumps with Dragon Ball in them
Re: Vic Mignogna
Well but that's not the truth. He's been made aware of his behavior time and time again.
Re: Vic Mignogna
And even then...intention doesn't matter.
Despite what television has you believe, no one wakes up one day and goes "I JUST FEEL LIKE I WANT TO RAPE SOMEONE TODAY." Sexual Harrassment, and including rape, occurs due to a number of harmful behaviors and ideals that are unfortunately validated in our society. The problem with Vic isnt' that he wasn't aware--he just didn't give a shit. He put his needs before others and thought he was entitled to touching women inappropriately. But because he didn't actually "rape anyone," then what he did is perfectly okay.
But it's not.
Despite what television has you believe, no one wakes up one day and goes "I JUST FEEL LIKE I WANT TO RAPE SOMEONE TODAY." Sexual Harrassment, and including rape, occurs due to a number of harmful behaviors and ideals that are unfortunately validated in our society. The problem with Vic isnt' that he wasn't aware--he just didn't give a shit. He put his needs before others and thought he was entitled to touching women inappropriately. But because he didn't actually "rape anyone," then what he did is perfectly okay.
But it's not.
Re: Vic Mignogna
I think I've said it before, but it's hugely revealing that this is the tactic they're leading with now - a technicality in Texas law as to what's legally defined as "sexual assault" in that one state. If this is their defense... doesn't that tacitly admit that Mignogna is guilty of what he's been accused? If they're focused in redefining the assaults, they're not denying they happened - they're just trying to "downplay" the charges and reset the narrative.
Besides which... "sexual assault" is a widely-used, common term regarding any assault that's sexual in nature. Whether or not Texas happens to have garbage laws on the matter, if he's assaulted people and it was sexual in nature (ie, groping and/or kissing without consent), calling that sexual assault is just... reasonable? And true?
Besides which... "sexual assault" is a widely-used, common term regarding any assault that's sexual in nature. Whether or not Texas happens to have garbage laws on the matter, if he's assaulted people and it was sexual in nature (ie, groping and/or kissing without consent), calling that sexual assault is just... reasonable? And true?
- XanatosVanBadass
- Banned
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:46 pm
Re: Vic Mignogna
Oh, the stand with Vic crowd knows he’s guilty as fuck for the most part. They just don’t care.Bryesque wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:35 pm I think I've said it before, but it's hugely revealing that this is the tactic they're leading with now - a technicality in Texas law as to what's legally defined as "sexual assault" in that one state. If this is their defense... doesn't that tacitly admit that Mignogna is guilty of what he's been accused? If they're focused in redefining the assaults, they're not denying they happened - they're just trying to "downplay" the charges and reset the narrative.
Besides which... "sexual assault" is a widely-used, common term regarding any assault that's sexual in nature. Whether or not Texas happens to have garbage laws on the matter, if he's assaulted people and it was sexual in nature (ie, groping and/or kissing without consent), calling that sexual assault is just... reasonable? And true?
Re: Vic Mignogna
And I'm sure there's a significant number of that crowd who like him so much specifically because they know he's guilty.XanatosVanBadass wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:48 pmOh, the stand with Vic crowd knows he’s guilty as fuck for the most part. They just don’t care.Bryesque wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:35 pm I think I've said it before, but it's hugely revealing that this is the tactic they're leading with now - a technicality in Texas law as to what's legally defined as "sexual assault" in that one state. If this is their defense... doesn't that tacitly admit that Mignogna is guilty of what he's been accused? If they're focused in redefining the assaults, they're not denying they happened - they're just trying to "downplay" the charges and reset the narrative.
Besides which... "sexual assault" is a widely-used, common term regarding any assault that's sexual in nature. Whether or not Texas happens to have garbage laws on the matter, if he's assaulted people and it was sexual in nature (ie, groping and/or kissing without consent), calling that sexual assault is just... reasonable? And true?
It's a sad truth that a lot of this anger comes from dudes who are absolutely terrified of there being actual consequences for bad behaviour - because if there are, that would mean they'd have have to actually learn and care and grow as people. And instead of accepting that inevitability, they'll viciously fight against it and glom onto any "cause" that tells them they can stay the same sad, stunted children and that whatever they do, nobody can tell them "no".
Re: Vic Mignogna
It's also continuing to jump into this like Vic is actually being prosecuted, which he still isn't. Nobody is trying to put the man in prison. Nobody is pressing charges. They just wanted him out of where they were. Because he's a creepy douche. You can totally be fired for being a creepy douche, especially in a state where companies don't even need a reason to fire you. This is why people saying "hE's GoNnA sUe FuNiMaTiOn FoR aLl ThEy'Re WoRtH!!!1!!" don't know what the fuck they're talking about.Bryesque wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 4:35 pm I think I've said it before, but it's hugely revealing that this is the tactic they're leading with now - a technicality in Texas law as to what's legally defined as "sexual assault" in that one state. If this is their defense... doesn't that tacitly admit that Mignogna is guilty of what he's been accused? If they're focused in redefining the assaults, they're not denying they happened - they're just trying to "downplay" the charges and reset the narrative.
Besides which... "sexual assault" is a widely-used, common term regarding any assault that's sexual in nature. Whether or not Texas happens to have garbage laws on the matter, if he's assaulted people and it was sexual in nature (ie, groping and/or kissing without consent), calling that sexual assault is just... reasonable? And true?