What would you have liked instead?Avok wrote:The GoDs look for the most part awful as well. The elephant looks alright, and the fox doesn't look too bad, but a clown and a robot? Really?
I wasn't hoping much to begin with, but I was interested to watch it, now I'm just baffled.
"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
- Neo-Makaiōshin
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2506
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:31 pm
- Location: Argentina
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Dragon Ball was always a kid series and fans should stop being in denial.
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
He's open to suggestions from the staff, someone could have asked him to do something with Broly and he decided to do his own thing with it.Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.DI297 wrote:It's like Toriyama looked for an excuse to please the fans with the whole female ssj and canon Broly thing and was too lazy to do it right.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Yeah, I said the influence was obvious. But this isn't Broly as far as we know. It just look like him and people are acting like it is straight up Broly from the movies. As I said ,very little info from a 12 second clip and even less time of the character. I just don't see the point of freaking out right now.Avok wrote:It's literally Broly with a little more chest. The name of the transformation is irrelevant.Boo Machine wrote:The Broly influence is obvious. But lets not fly off the handle. We know nothing about this character other than she shares features with Broly when Transformed. We don't know if this form is LSSJ. I was enjoying the reactions but I really don't want a trunk load of salt for the next week over so little info. I say wait till we get details, THEN freak out.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
This is a bold statement for something that has no context.Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.DI297 wrote:It's like Toriyama looked for an excuse to please the fans with the whole female ssj and canon Broly thing and was too lazy to do it right.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Probably from the opening. I doubt they have gotten to anime fights already, even if they have, I doubt things look this good already.Lujin_16 wrote:So is this clip from the opening or some scenes of the arc????
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
He already did it with Bardock and literally made ssj kaioken a canon thing so why wouldn't he do the same with Broly?Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.DI297 wrote:It's like Toriyama looked for an excuse to please the fans with the whole female ssj and canon Broly thing and was too lazy to do it right.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Some parts are from the opening and some from an episode, the part where all the gods are shown doesn't look like an opening at all neither does the final part with Goku smiling.Sodhi wrote:Probably from the opening. I doubt they have gotten to anime fights already, even if they have, I doubt things look this good already.Lujin_16 wrote:So is this clip from the opening or some scenes of the arc????
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Technically, Super Saiyan Kaioken was a Toei idea that he approved of.DI297 wrote:He already did it with Bardock and literally made ssj kaioken a canon thing so why wouldn't he do the same with Broly?Jinzoningen MULE wrote:I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.DI297 wrote:It's like Toriyama looked for an excuse to please the fans with the whole female ssj and canon Broly thing and was too lazy to do it right.
Even then, Toriyama does fan service to a point. Like we got Future Trunks back for one arc, but despite popular demand Trunks didn't stay nor did he used anything from Online or Xenoverse. The same with 'evil Goku' being just a more expanded version of what Ginyu did back in the Namek Saga or how he trolled Vegetto's fans with the one-hour time limit.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
I just realized the significance of the Broly look alike. If they see her and acknowledge they fought their own LSSJ in their universe then it would make him canon like Tarble is...!!!!! Broly and movie 8 could become canon soon.
Last edited by TheMikado on Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Dude, wait until we get some actual information about the character before you break down and curse super to hell. What are you, a dragonball fa-... Fuck.Lord Beerus wrote:I cannot believe that the mere concept of LSSJ migrated into Super. For what it's worth, one thing I can salvage from this disaster is that we have first ever female SSJ. That is landmark moment, no matter what way you slice it. It took us over twenty years to get there, but we got there. It's an almighty shame regarding the circumstances of that moment. I just can't help but think of Broly every time I see that form. And it instantly reminds me of how much I'm apathetic towards the character. I pray this will grow on me but I don't think it will.
When Super apparently shoves Goku down our throats:
Spoiler:
Kanassa wrote:- FoolsGil, Out of Context, 2017FoolsGil wrote:I hope Mark is dead. But chances are the dragonballs will bring his stupid ass back.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
DB is known to reuse designs, and just because it looks like a certain character, we still have no idea what it will actually turn out to be, or how it will be used. I'd just wait til the arc starts to see what's actually going on.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
That's my point, he is pleasing the fans but in his own way not the way they want, I wouldn't be surprised if he makes ssj4 canon for universe 6 or something like that.HeroR wrote:Technically, Super Saiyan Kaioken was a Toei idea that he approved of.DI297 wrote:He already did it with Bardock and literally made ssj kaioken a canon thing so why wouldn't he do the same with Broly?Jinzoningen MULE wrote: I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.
Even then, Toriyama does fan service to a point. Like we got Future Trunks back for one arc, but despite popular demand Trunks didn't stay nor did he used anything from Online or Xenoverse. The same with 'evil Goku' being just a more expanded version of what Ginyu did back in the Namek Saga or how he trolled Vegetto's fans with the one-hour time limit.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
That's my point, he is pleasing the fans but in his own way not the way they want, I wouldn't be surprised if he makes ssj4 canon for universe 6 or something like that.HeroR wrote:Technically, Super Saiyan Kaioken was a Toei idea that he approved of.DI297 wrote:He already did it with Bardock and literally made ssj kaioken a canon thing so why wouldn't he do the same with Broly?Jinzoningen MULE wrote: I guarantee you that this is not Toriyama's doing. He doesn't expand on idea that he didn't create, Bardock literally being the only substantial exception. Also, he's on record as going out of his way to not please fans back in the day, I doubt he's pulled a 180 on that principle.
Even then, Toriyama does fan service to a point. Like we got Future Trunks back for one arc, but despite popular demand Trunks didn't stay nor did he used anything from Online or Xenoverse. The same with 'evil Goku' being just a more expanded version of what Ginyu did back in the Namek Saga or how he trolled Vegetto's fans with the one-hour time limit.
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Hey, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt... for now. But boy howdy, there better be a flashback episode or two for this shit.Kanassa wrote:Dude, wait until we get some actual information about the character before you break down and curse super to hell. What are you, a dragonball fa-... Fuck.Lord Beerus wrote:I cannot believe that the mere concept of LSSJ migrated into Super. For what it's worth, one thing I can salvage from this disaster is that we have first ever female SSJ. That is landmark moment, no matter what way you slice it. It took us over twenty years to get there, but we got there. It's an almighty shame regarding the circumstances of that moment. I just can't help but think of Broly every time I see that form. And it instantly reminds me of how much I'm apathetic towards the character. I pray this will grow on me but I don't think it will.
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
More egyptian deities. I mean, why would they have egyptian robes?Neo-Makaiōshin wrote: What would you have liked instead?
Even other animals are fine. The fox and the elephant are cool, even the human-like female is really nice, but the clown, the robot, the dawrf and the Venonat-looking one are straight up garbage.
Technically it's not him, but what's the difference? He wasn't a well develop or special character to begin with. His only trait was his crazy and plain personality and that transformation.Boo Machine wrote:
Yeah, I said the influence was obvious. But this isn't Broly as far as we know. It just look like him and people are acting like it is straight up Broly from the movies. As I said ,very little info from a 12 second clip and even less time of the character. I just don't see the point of freaking out right now.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Oh God, they kept the hair color as that shitty green-yellow abomination. I hope that it will be handwaved with some sort of explanation this time.
- Boo Machine
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2016 7:44 pm
- Location: On the Track to NoWhere
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
We don't know the difference. Thats the thing. We know nothing and people are acting like this is Broly and like they know the character from 2 seconds of a clip. I just think it's silly to hate a character we know nothing about just because she resembles Broly. She could be exactly the same and the freak outs are justified. She could be so radically different that she might be a fan favorite. Nobody has a clue, yet the first instinct is to freak out.Avok wrote:
Technically it's not him, but what's the difference? He wasn't a well develop or special character to begin with. His only trait was his crazy and plain personality and that transformation.
SUBARASHII! - Goku Black
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
I am the Great Saiyaman! Defender of truth! Protector of the innocent! Upholder of justice! Doer of good!
To Infinity, then stop!
Anime are Cartoons.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
We still barely know anything about the arc yet. This tournament involves every universe, and we will probably get to see over 100 new characters. This is the perfect chance for them to experiment with different designs and ideas. So I wouldn't write anything off just yet.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Hey, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt... for now. But boy howdy, there better be a flashback episode or two for this shit.[/quote]Lord Beerus wrote: Dude, wait until we get some actual information about the character before you break down and curse super to hell. What are you, a dragonball fa-... Fuck.
Lord Beerus, I would think you of all people would be more opened minded since you were dead set against 'evil Goku' and now you adore Goku Black.
I am not happy about Broly either, mostly because of Broly fans then the actual character, but I am willing to see how this plays out before passing judgment. I was dead set against Vegetto and Toriyama made it worked for me by giving him a time limit, stopping the endless 'why don't they just fuse', making Vegetto struggled instead of it being a mud stomped, and giving the 'kill' to someone else.
Kanassa wrote:Goku barely took a backseat in the Buu saga, at best he took a leisurely stroll round back while everyone else cried for him to come back.precita wrote:Goku will still be around but take a Buu saga approach backseat.
- Sandubadear
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
- Location: Space Amazon
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread
Robot?Avok wrote:Even other animals are fine. The fox and the elephant are cool, even the human-like female is really nice, but the clown, the robot, the dawrf and the Venonat-looking one are straight up garbage.
If you mean the one that came after the humanoid goddess, he looked more like a baboon to me.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra
"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr
時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra






