CODii wrote:MarcFBR wrote:
It'd be pretty hard to make a BD worse than a DVD using any masters that are better than DVD to be honest.
If the masters were better then yes that would be true. But there is almost no conceivable way that Funimation could have better masters than the Dragon Box masters. Toei is notorious for providing crappy masters to their licensees. Funimation has clearly stated that they are using a film master for this, that they are then doing their own remaster on. That film master they have in their posession is almost certainly a piece of crap.
And you're not going to convince me that 16mm film is going to look as good as 35mm. The 35mm negative has several times the surface area (about 4 times if I'm not mistaken) of a 16mm negative. I am NOT saying that 16mm cannot look good. A much better example of the virtues of 16mm film than yours would be The Hurt Locker, which was a very good looking film. All things being equal however, 35mm will look more detailed than 16mm because of the increased surface area.
MOAR TALKING
You seemingly missed the entire point of my post.
Which was that the people (yourself included based on the content of your post) who keep going it won't work on Blu-ray BECAUSE it's 16mm were making a mistake.
DBZ TV will always look meh on Blu-ray, because it is cheaply produced animation with a low level of quality and detail (in general) not because they put it on 16mm instead of 35mm. No doubt it would look sharper if it were 35mm, but in the case of what I've seen in the past with this type of animation, not much.
I didn't bring up the Toei issue much because by this point it is common knowledge Toei fucking sucks (get ahold of some early Toei DVDs. I have a handful of them, fucking horrendous.)
As for Hurt Locker- You've missed the point of me using Evil Dead as an example. Hurt Locker was a modern film, with modern, good quality filmstock. Sure it's 16mm, but it's better than 'cheap' 16mm back in the 80s/90s would have been. Evil Dead made the perfect example because it was filmed on 16mm, it was done cheaply with cheap filmstock, the Blu-ray was cropped, and to add to it, the masters likely weren't stored well for most of their life. It made the perfect base of comparison for my point- DBZ TV will look meh not because of it being filmstock lower than 35mm, but because it's ratty masters for a show that honestly, wasn't animated to a high standard in the first place.
Not to mention the fact that almost everything you said has been said earlier in the thread (half the time by me...) so I feel the need to ask... have you actually read the thread?