I don't think that is really logical. It looks far-fatched and is only a escape route.hleV wrote:The only real difference between Vegetto and Kibitoshin is that fusees Vegetto is made of are rivals. Kibitoshin is obviously not a multiplier of Kaioshin and Kibito's BPs. It's a fan assumption, right, but it's the only logical one if you ask me.Fox666 wrote:That is just an assumption of the fans. We can't be sure of what kind effect the rivalry thing would have.hleV wrote:Potara Fusion of Goku and Vegeta = Goku * Vegeta. Multiplier of their BPs because the fusees are rivals.
Besides it's not like "rivalry" was ever meant to be taken as an 1+1 attribute, neither it is a solid concept or something you can measure. As far I can tell, the fusion take the best of the two parts, and very different beings get a better result. That's why Vegetto is great and Kaioshin is not.
To tell the truth I think that trying to create a formula for the fusion (i.e. "rivarly boost") is what really makes everything complicated.hleV wrote:Why would it be so complicated? I'm up for the simpliest yet most logical theories.
Metamorian Fusion is unmeasurable for us, fans, because we don't know how strong were Goten and Trunks, compared to anyone.
Potara Fusion of Kaioshin and Kibito seems to be pretty weak, yet Potara Fusion of Goku and Vegeta is incredibly strong. On top of that, it's stated to be a multiplier of their BPs, which contradicts with nothing. Rivalry boost is mentioned. It's a great idea why Vegetto is so strong.
Simple as that.
Dragon Ball is not complicated. We just don't know all the details. Complicated theories are silly.
The best approach for analysing a fusion is that of a plot device. Fusion works much like saiyans near-death power-ups, a completely random value.
I could too create some kind of formula for near-death power-up like "punch in the stomach = 33x power-up", but the reality is that you can't measure such a thing, and any kind of rule would look too amateur.





