Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4215
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Kid Buu » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:08 pm

BlazingFiddlesticks wrote: I mean, I'll throw myself on the table and say that the Dragon Ball Hunt and 22nd World Tournament really don't do that much for me (My most memorable moment to me out of the later was 90% filler!), hell, I can't say I ever bought Piccolo Jr. as a villain (and this from a guy who love the family's demonic bent)! But I cannot say they made strange story choices the way Cell and Buu did.
I feel like the 22nd Budokai and 23rd Budokai make each other redundant as they both are just Goku becoming the strongest on the Earth. Yes Goku lost to Tenshinhan but the latter still felt like Goku was the true winner. Ma Junior was a lame villain who barely accomplished anything.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
Duo
I Live Here
Posts: 3221
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:14 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Duo » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:37 pm

@thatdbzguy

I'm not sugarcoating anything. I don't think those story arcs sucked, I just didn't happen to think they were as good as previous arcs. With a few fairly minor changes, you can repair a lot of the weaknesses in those story's. That is not indicative of something that sucks.

User avatar
dbzfan7
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 13045
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 3:55 am
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by dbzfan7 » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:50 pm

I'd say it's a mix

DB - Underrated by the general audience but somewhat overrated by older fans
DBZ - Overrated by the general audience but somewhat underrated by hardcore anime fans
DBGT - Greatly hated besides characters, and not really as bad as everyone says it is
DB(Z) Kai -Most commonly loved by purists while hated by most Toonami 90's kids..

Yeah the first arc of GT I never go back to, but I don't think it's that bad. I even watched the english dub where Goku acted like Superman with darkness blah blah blah speech. I still thought it was ok..
Why Dragon Ball Consistency in something such as power levels matter!

User avatar
dbboxkaifan
Banned
Posts: 8906
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:32 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by dbboxkaifan » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:52 pm

I thought this was about the first arc of Dragon Ball not specifically the original series.

But back to the question, Dragon Ball getting too much praise? Erm, where? If anything, Dragon Ball Z and Dragon Ball GT even manage to get more than Dragon Ball.

Rewatching GT reminded me of the original Dragon Ball and Dr. Slump and Arale-chan too which is pretty cool. GT had its mix of DB with Z and some of its own material, most people seem to hate it but I like it a lot.
FUNimation 2015 Releases I want:
- Kai 2.0 on Blu-ray

User avatar
DBZ Mick
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:38 am
Location: Australia

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by DBZ Mick » Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:48 am

It gets too little.

I remember being on Atari back in 2007 and the consensus was they all thought it was 'immature' or the fights weren't cool or something. Those were the younger fans however. The older ones did enjoy it.

The manga especially of the first half of the series is fantastic though. It's sad that most people just think of the anime more though or Z (I do like a lot of it though but don't think I've ever watched it straight through).
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.

Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.

-DemonRin

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Rocketman » Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:25 pm

I don't think DB gets more absolute praise, but it does have a much higher proportion of praise than Z does. This guys summed it up pretty well:
RandomGuy96 wrote:How many times have you heard someone complain that the Z fights rely less on strategy and skill than the DB fights? Or that DBZ was focused too much on one or two characters while screwing over the supporting cast, while DB didn't? Or that the characters in DB have development while the ones in Z don't? Dragon Ball is just as bad if not worse in those areas compared to the post-Raditz portions, yet so rarely gets criticized for them.

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4215
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Kid Buu » Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:35 pm

While RandomGuy96 is right with his viewpoints, one thing I think the pre-Raditz era does better is the characters are more likeable. Even characters that are omnipresent in Z like Goku and Kuririn I liked better in the pre-Raditz era for sure.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
BlazingFiddlesticks
I Live Here
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 8:48 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by BlazingFiddlesticks » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:53 am

Rocketman wrote:I don't think DB gets more absolute praise, but it does have a much higher proportion of praise than Z does. This guys summed it up pretty well:
RandomGuy96 wrote:How many times have you heard someone complain that the Z fights rely less on strategy and skill than the DB fights? Or that DBZ was focused too much on one or two characters while screwing over the supporting cast, while DB didn't? Or that the characters in DB have development while the ones in Z don't? Dragon Ball is just as bad if not worse in those areas compared to the post-Raditz portions, yet so rarely gets criticized for them.
Dragon Ball is Dragon Ball Goku Time far more than GT ever was. That destroys it's pedestal right there if there's anything resembling a consensus that Goku not doing things and letting other characters breath is a good thing.
JulieYBM wrote:
Pannaliciour wrote:Reading all the comments and interviews, my conclusion is: nobody knows what the hell is going on.
Just like Dragon Ball since Chapter #4.
son veku wrote:
Metalwario64 wrote:
BlazingFiddlesticks wrote:Kingdom Piccolo
Where is that located?
Canada

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4215
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Kid Buu » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:58 am

Eh the other fighters got a lot of moments thanks to the tournaments, but if you're going by "usefulness" then yeah it would be Goku's time.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5937
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by FortuneSSJ » Sun Feb 02, 2014 2:42 pm

No, not at all. I only hear people talking about DBZ even when its about the manga.
Sometimes i wonder how many fans watched the 153 episodes prior to Z era.

Consequently, when those people say dragon ball hasnt any storyline makes me laugh.
A world without Dragon Ball is just boring.

Favourite old DB Animators: Masaki Sato and Tadayoshi Yamamuro
Favourite new DB Animators: Yuya Takahashi and Chikashi Kubota

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by TheGmGoken » Sun Feb 02, 2014 3:02 pm

No really. Part One is usually not talked about. As honestly I can say a good deal either never saw it or ignored it because it doesn't have ki attacks flying everywhere like GT and Z does. I mean once you get fans that do watch, of course they will say it's better. As most of them talk about it only because they find it better.

To me it goes like this:

Dragonball - The unpopular one but just as awesome. People know about the basic story but doesn't bother watching it cause it's not "cool" so to speak. As it's more gaggy. I do see people talk more about King Piccolo Arc than any other arc in Dragonball Part 1

Z - Nostalgia. First Dragonball thing they saw. Badass. Ki attacks everywhere. DEATH! LOVE(Vegeta and Bulma)! Drama! Outer SPACE! The average fan I THINK might want to see this is fiction rather than hand to hand combat.

GT - The hated step sister that isn't that bad(Though I think it's absolutely SHIT)

Kai - The twin brother of Z. Half like this twin. The other half hate the twin for not being like the other twin. Kinda like Zack and Cody. DBZ is Zack. And DBz Kai is Cody.

Nikkolas
Regular
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:00 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Nikkolas » Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:26 am

As I pointd out on here before, the Budokai tournaments were a great way to showcase fighters other than Goku. Krillin never stooda chance against Goku in the 22nd Tournament and Yamcha never stood a chance against Tenshinhan but neither of them looked weak or pathetic. In fact, it's that fight with Tenshinhan most people cite as Yamcha's most awesome moment. If you aren't a Saiyan in DBZ though, odds are you are not only going to be useless, you are going to have your uselessness highlighted again and again and again.

Also I'd say one of DB's strengths compared to Z is that it lacks character development. The fact is, Toriyama can't write a good, in-depth character to save his life. Z was him overstretching his limited abilities. DB though was a simplistic but well-executed narrative. It's kinda the difference between The Matrix and its sequels.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:34 am

Nikkolas wrote:As I pointd out on here before, the Budokai tournaments were a great way to showcase fighters other than Goku. Krillin never stooda chance against Goku in the 22nd Tournament and Yamcha never stood a chance against Tenshinhan but neither of them looked weak or pathetic. In fact, it's that fight with Tenshinhan most people cite as Yamcha's most awesome moment. If you aren't a Saiyan in DBZ though, odds are you are not only going to be useless, you are going to have your uselessness highlighted again and again and again.

Also I'd say one of DB's strengths compared to Z is that it lacks character development. The fact is, Toriyama can't write a good, in-depth character to save his life. Z was him overstretching his limited abilities. DB though was a simplistic but well-executed narrative. It's kinda the difference between The Matrix and its sequels.
What? Yamcha looked quite pathetic. Ten toyed with him a little then roflstomped him and insulted him. Yamcha looked like a totally useless wuss.

If you're not Goku in the original Dragon Ball, you're going to look totally pathetic all the time to make Goku look better.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Saiga
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8311
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Space Australia

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Saiga » Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:44 am

I do feel that Kuririn looked weak in his fight against Goku. It honestly makes me uncomfortable reading it for that reason, and even more so when it's revealed that Goku had been holding back at a 'match level'.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!

Nikkolas
Regular
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:00 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Nikkolas » Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:57 am

RandomGuy96 wrote: What? Yamcha looked quite pathetic. Ten toyed with him a little then roflstomped him and insulted him. Yamcha looked like a totally useless wuss.

If you're not Goku in the original Dragon Ball, you're going to look totally pathetic all the time to make Goku look better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRyoCM6xI40

That was more awesome than anything he ever did in Z.

Master Roshi NEVER looked pathetic in DB.

You could argue Tien looked pathetic too when he fought a Goku holding back in the 23rd Budokai but where are all you complainers when Goku fought Vegeta in the Buu Saga? That is an immensely popular fight. No one ever says he made Vegeta look pathetic even though he purposefully kept himself weaker.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8881
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:04 am

Nikkolas wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote: What? Yamcha looked quite pathetic. Ten toyed with him a little then roflstomped him and insulted him. Yamcha looked like a totally useless wuss.

If you're not Goku in the original Dragon Ball, you're going to look totally pathetic all the time to make Goku look better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRyoCM6xI40

That was more awesome than anything he ever did in Z.

Master Roshi NEVER looked pathetic in DB.

You could argue Tenshinhan looked pathetic too when he fought a Goku holding back in the 23rd Budokai but where are all you complainers when Goku fought Vegeta in the Buu Saga? That is an immensely popular fight. No one ever says he made Vegeta look pathetic even though he purposefully kept himself weaker.
I'm not sure how much of that fight is filler, but I don't think that makes him look awesome. He just looks pathetic since he can only do anything because Ten's holding back. Once he stops holding back, Ten immediately roflsotmps Yamcha.

He didn't look pathetic when an exhausted and injured Piccolo outright told him and the rest of the supporting cast that, even though he's not at full power, they still can't do anything to him, and would just get in Goku's way if they tried to help? And when everyone agrees?

Ten looked pathetic there and when Drum kicked his ass, only for Drum to have his eyes kicked out by Goku. Oh, and in the above instance with Piccolo. I do complain about that instance with Vegeta, I think that whole fight is bullcrap. And it does make Vegeta look quite pathetic, but then again so does the entire Buu Saga. Which is one of the many reasons I love it! I mean for god's sake, he has a big dramatic death scene, where he performs a heroic sacrifice to stop Majin Buu... who completely laughs it off and goes back to trolling the Earth. Chiaotzu's death scene had more dignity to it. At least Nappa seemed like a threat and was a villain through and through, so his sacrifice built up hopelessness if nothing else. For Vegeta, he sacrifices himself pointlessly against a fat comical moron who later becomes a good guy.
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

Codarik
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1030
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:20 am
Location: Snake Way

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Codarik » Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:05 am

It seems like the "hardcore" fans are the ones that praises it a lot. It does deserve it. And it seems the "casual" fans don't like it cause they claim its "boring".

User avatar
Kid Buu
I Live Here
Posts: 4215
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 4:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by Kid Buu » Mon Feb 03, 2014 12:19 pm

<deleted>
Last edited by Kid Buu on Thu May 01, 2014 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rocketman wrote:"Shonen" basically means "stupid sentimental shit" anyway, so it's ok to be anti-shonen.

User avatar
MediaFanGirl93
Beyond Newbie
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 11:43 pm

Re: Does Dragon Ball Part One Get Too Much Praise?

Post by MediaFanGirl93 » Mon Feb 03, 2014 2:32 pm

I disagree. I think that Part 2 is overrated, because of how stupidly powerful the Saiyans are compared to the humans. I mean, many people say that they hate Dragoball, but love DBZ.

Post Reply