On-Topic thread of Awesomeness!

Pain · Post by **Pain** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:47 pm

Innagadadavida wrote:
Pitzu wrote:Also, Gozar is a retarded fanboy
NO! BAD! Name calling is bad!

Well according to the circumstances, you're both newbies.

BlueSky · Post by **Kaboom** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:48 pm

Pitzu wrote:Also, Gozar is a retarded fanboy

Erm, yeah, uh... that's a bit too much.

JulieYBM · Post by **JulieYBM** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:00 pm

Calling people names over a cartoon? Not exactly the best way to express yourself.

Nobody felt the need to alte Frodo's look, past, and character to make him easier to relate to. Did they?

Tatsunoboshi Horoko · Post by **Tatsunoboshi Horoko** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:02 pm

I don't know what everyone in this Karate Kid/Teen Wolf collaboration flick thread is so worked up over. This seriously looks to be a promising entry into both series.

Onikage725 · Post by **Onikage725** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:08 pm

SSj Kaboom wrote:I agree with the notion that Dark Knight is somewhat overhyped, but to say it was bad or "sucked" is simply ludicrous. Heath Ledger's performance as Joker was more than enough to make the film great, and yes, Aaron Eckhart's Dent/Two-Face was great too.

Yeah I agree with that. But I have to say, I tend to reach for the marvel flicks from last year before TDK.

Gozar · Post by **Gozar** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:28 pm

Pitzu wrote:Also, Gozar is a retarded fanboy

Any credibility you had is now lost.

These movie adaptions out there cannot all be defended with "Well it's an alternate universe" or "Well it's an adaption"

If that's the case then there's no need for discussion period. But it's not the case, the fact is we're getting a movie that's based off of DragonBall. Yet the characters do not resemble the characters they are supposed to be based off of. If that doesn't bother you then that's your business. But don't try to brush off negative opinions and being a retarded fanboy when you yourself cannot even intelligently debate this without throwing such childish insults.

Pain wrote:
Innagadadavida wrote:
Pitzu wrote:Also, Gozar is a retarded fanboy
NO! BAD! Name calling is bad!
Well according to the circumstances, you're both newbies.

What? You mean based on the fact that the movie isn't even out?

Chuquita · Post by **Chuquita** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:39 pm

So....if he didn't hit his head, it's not really "Goku", is it? It's more like "Kakarrotto".

I still haven't found anything that endears me to him, or makes me like Chatku in any way.

Do we have any proof yet whether or not Chatku's got the bump?

Saiyan-Professor · Post by **Saiyan-Professor** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:56 pm

Chuquita wrote:So....if he didn't hit his head, it's not really "Goku", is it? It's more like "Kakarrotto".

I still haven't found anything that endears me to him, or makes me like Chatku in any way.

Do we have any proof yet whether or not Chatku's got the bump?

What does a bump have to do with anything? Are not the excuses for not liking the movie getting a little silly?

BlueSky · Post by **Kaboom** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:57 pm

Saiyan-Professor wrote:What does a bump have to do with anything? Are not the excuses for not liking the movie getting a little silly?

Erm, I think she means the "bump" on the head that reversed series-Goku's personality. It seems absent in the movie, wherein Goku has just been raised as he is.

jda95 · Post by **jda95** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:59 pm

Chuquita wrote:So....if he didn't hit his head, it's not really "Goku", is it? It's more like "Kakarrotto".

I still haven't found anything that endears me to him, or makes me like Chatku in any way.

Do we have any proof yet whether or not Chatku's got the bump?

He is Kakarotto, trained to hide his powers and be polite.

I'm still not buying Chatku.

Kendamu · Post by **Kendamu** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:59 pm

Saiyan-Professor wrote:
Chuquita wrote:So....if he didn't hit his head, it's not really "Goku", is it? It's more like "Kakarrotto".

I still haven't found anything that endears me to him, or makes me like Chatku in any way.

Do we have any proof yet whether or not Chatku's got the bump?
What does a bump have to do with anything? Are not the excuses for not liking the movie getting a little silly?

Only because people are still trying to justify not liking the movie to people who won't listen to rational answers like, "It doesn't appeal to me because it isn't enough like the manga. Have fun. I'm sitting this one out," and instead retort with, "Stupid fanboy! I'm insulted by your opinion of a movie!"

Chrono Trigger · Post by **Chrono Trigger** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:02 pm

Kendamu wrote:"It doesn't appeal to me because it isn't enough like the manga. Have fun. I'm sitting this one out,

HA! I wish FlashDude and Acid Reign were that polite about it.

MisterFlashdude · Post by **MisterFlashdude** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:07 pm

Chrono Trigger wrote:
Kendamu wrote:"It doesn't appeal to me because it isn't enough like the manga. Have fun. I'm sitting this one out,
HA! I wish FlashDude and Acid Reign were that polite about it.

Who else thinks the new thread title is awesome?
I second it.

MajinVejitaXV · Post by **MajinVejitaXV** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:10 pm

MisterFlashdude wrote: Who else thinks the new thread title is awesome?
I second it.

Indeed. By the power vested in me, this thread is no longer late.

[/DELATED]

-Corey

Tanooki Kuribo · Post by **Tanooki Kuribo** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:11 pm

Is a delate like a latte?

(Aw, he fixed it, now our jokes make no sense)

MajinVejitaXV · Post by **MajinVejitaXV** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:12 pm

Tanooki Kuribo wrote:Is a delate like a latte?

YES. The thread needs to be de-latted. In a big way.

-Corey

jda95 · Post by **jda95** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:17 pm

MajinVejitaXV wrote:
Tanooki Kuribo wrote:Is a delate like a latte?
YES. The thread needs to be de-latted. In a big way.

-Corey

I disagree. This topic needs to be latted-to-the-max.

BlueSky · Post by **Kaboom** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:22 pm

So FOX caught wind and put their foot down, eh? I suppose that speaks something for the legitimacy of the script stuff.

Either way, it's not like we can unread what we've already read. So now we all have a little more insight into the film, for good or bad.

But I don't think the thread should be deleted. Locked, maybe. Let it fade away and die a natural thread death.

jjgp1112 · Post by **jjgp1112** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:24 pm

I agree, this thread should get delated. Not deleted, but delated. Whatever that is.

Saiyan-Professor · Post by **Saiyan-Professor** » Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:25 pm

SSj Kaboom wrote:So FOX caught wind and put their foot down, eh? I suppose that speaks something for the legitimacy of the script stuff.

Either way, it's not like we can unread what we've already read. So now we all have a little more insight into the film, for good or bad.

But I don't think the thread should be deleted. Locked, maybe. Let it fade away and die a natural thread death.

It should have been locked or deleted along time ago because they all end in the same manner.