"Dragon Ball Super" Series Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Discussion specifically regarding the "Dragon Ball Super" TV series premiering July 2015 in Japan, including individual threads for each episode.
User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:46 pm

ArchedThunder wrote:
precita wrote:But it doesn't make sense. In GT there is no mention of Super Saiyan God. Super Saiyan 4 doesn't make sense when God exists.

Supreme Kai and Kibito are still fused. There is no Beerus/Whis. No mention of other universes. There's no way it can fit into the current timeline at all.
Again, them including this here at a store/event that is a celebration of Dragon Ball does not mean GT and Super exist in the same continuity, it's just an acknowledgement that GT is a show that existed and is a part of the franchise.
Yeah it's an event for celebration of Dragon Ball, here's the (ugly) visual for the event:
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
GT happened and it's foolish for them to acknowledge it didn't. If Super ends at EoZ then they can continue like they have but if DBS wants to go past EoZ then things will get tricky but given the immense success of DBS I think they'll be willing to sacrifice GT off.

User avatar
Kanassa
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6265
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:57 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Kanassa » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:51 pm

Cetra wrote:
perucho1990 wrote:
Cetra wrote:
GT did not have bad writing. Just because a bunch of youtube comments say so because the compare what they loved about Z does not make GT have a bad script. A few inconsistencies does not make it automatically bad writing. GT has plenty of soul in it.
Black Dragon Balls Arc, Super 17 Arc, Most of the Shadow Dragons Arc had Hiro Mashima level of writing, bad attempt at gags, horrible sense of humor, forgettable antagonists, horrible characterization(See Pan).
So you are stating your opinion as a fact.
Like you were. You're both hypocrites.
When Super apparently shoves Goku down our throats:

Kanassa wrote:
FoolsGil wrote:I hope Mark is dead. But chances are the dragonballs will bring his stupid ass back. :D
- FoolsGil, Out of Context, 2017

User avatar
ArchedThunder
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5718
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by ArchedThunder » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:53 pm

Baggie_Saiyan wrote: Yeah it's an event for celebration of Dragon Ball, here's the (ugly) visual for the event:
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
GT happened and it's foolish for them to acknowledge it didn't. If Super ends at EoZ then they can continue like they have but if DBS wants to go past EoZ then things will get tricky but given the immense success of DBS I think they'll be willing to sacrifice GT off.
It's simple, if the new era of Dragon Ball ever over laps with GT directly in terms of timeline they can just outright say GT is an "alternate world". That way they don't make GT fans feel like it's been invalidated and it still leaves them plenty of room for crossing them over in video games, or if they are really ballsy they can still do a special or something that crosses them over, though I'd rather they not.
Last edited by ArchedThunder on Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cetra
I Live Here
Posts: 3855
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Cetra » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:54 pm

Kanassa wrote:
Cetra wrote:
perucho1990 wrote:
Black Dragon Balls Arc, Super 17 Arc, Most of the Shadow Dragons Arc had Hiro Mashima level of writing, bad attempt at gags, horrible sense of humor, forgettable antagonists, horrible characterization(See Pan).
So you are stating your opinion as a fact.
Like you were. You're both hypocrites.
Have you even read my other posts? I have thoroughly explained that for my comment I have considered a standard that is not universally considered as a fact. Before accusing someone you should read what they have to say.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy

feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"

User avatar
Draconic
I Live Here
Posts: 2096
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Romania

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Draconic » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:57 pm

They can't just write off the show they've marketed as the continuation of Z for 20 years like that. Unless they actually get into that time frame with the story, even if Super or a Super sequel go until the last day of the last year before GT and continuity wise nothing ties in, they'll keep it. No matter how many people dislike the show, it's a much bigger part of the franchise than any pre-BoG movie, so of course they'll acknoweledge it. Like it or not GT will be held in the same regard as the original two shows as long as Dragon Ball exists.
Check out the videos below, made by yours truly!

Goku vs Beerus BOG/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/kKKnMe

Vegeta vs Freeza ROF/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/MKPepW

User avatar
ArchedThunder
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5718
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by ArchedThunder » Fri Aug 11, 2017 3:59 pm

Draconic wrote:They can't just write off the show they've marketed as the continuation of Z for 20 years like that. Unless they actually get into that time frame with the story, even if Super or a Super sequel go until the last day of the last year before GT and continuity wise nothing ties in, they'll keep it. No matter how many people dislike the show, it's a much bigger part of the franchise than any pre-BoG movie, so of course they'll acknoweledge it. Like it or not GT will be held in the same regard as the original two shows as long as Dragon Ball exists.
Like I said, they don't need to write it off if they ever get new Dragon Ball to that point, they can just say it's an alternate world.

User avatar
perucho1990
I Live Here
Posts: 2361
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by perucho1990 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:03 pm

They should just mention that GT happened in one of the 5 timelines, for me this would be an easy way to fix this issue...

User avatar
Draconic
I Live Here
Posts: 2096
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:44 pm
Location: Romania

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Draconic » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:05 pm

ArchedThunder wrote:
Draconic wrote:They can't just write off the show they've marketed as the continuation of Z for 20 years like that. Unless they actually get into that time frame with the story, even if Super or a Super sequel go until the last day of the last year before GT and continuity wise nothing ties in, they'll keep it. No matter how many people dislike the show, it's a much bigger part of the franchise than any pre-BoG movie, so of course they'll acknoweledge it. Like it or not GT will be held in the same regard as the original two shows as long as Dragon Ball exists.
Like I said, they don't need to write it off if they ever get new Dragon Ball to that point, they can just say it's an alternate world.
It was a bit late when I proof read that part to change it, but yeah, I agree. Like you said, if they actually get to that time frame there's still stunts they can make to keep both shows. Hell, I imagine if that moment actually comes, they won't make a special, but actually devote an entire arc to that crossover.
Check out the videos below, made by yours truly!

Goku vs Beerus BOG/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/kKKnMe

Vegeta vs Freeza ROF/Super mash-up https://gofile.io/d/MKPepW

User avatar
ArchedThunder
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5718
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by ArchedThunder » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:11 pm

Draconic wrote: It was a bit late when I proof read that part to change it, but yeah, I agree. Like you said, if they actually get to that time frame there's still stunts they can make to keep both shows. Hell, I imagine if that moment actually comes, they won't make a special, but actually devote an entire arc to that crossover.
Honestly, an arc about parallel worlds could be really interesting, and instead of just crossing over Super and GT they could bring in stuff from other places as well and make new versions of existing characters and new characters from unseen worlds.
It's probably not a story Toriyama would write, but by the time Super or a sequel to Super reaches the timeframe that GT takes place in I don't imagine he'll still be the one in-charge, and it certainly seems like something Toyotaro could come up with.

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:18 pm

RedHeat wrote:Here you go

Image
頃 - around.[/quote]

Around? That has to be the most piss-poor, backhanded, handwave placation I have ever seen in my life.

Their entire way of dealing with the issue was.....one word? That should piss the rabid GT and Super fans off. Toeis promised you love, took your money, gave you a kiss on the cheek and f@#ked off.

Both sides get nothing.

User avatar
Sandubadear
I Live Here
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
Location: Space Amazon

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Sandubadear » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:37 pm

Love seeing people getting upset because GT exists.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"

"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr

時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra

User avatar
Zamasu55
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1784
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 2:23 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Zamasu55 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:39 pm

Sandubadear wrote:Love seeing people getting upset because GT exists.
It isn't canon.

User avatar
Alruneia
I Live Here
Posts: 2059
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:40 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Alruneia » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:40 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:Around? That has to be the most piss-poor, backhanded, handwave placation I have ever seen in my life.
Their entire way of dealing with the issue was.....one word? That should piss the rabid GT and Super fans off. Toeis promised you love, took your money, gave you a kiss on the cheek and f@#ked off.
Both sides get nothing.
It says "around 789" because GT does not only take place in 789, but in 790 as well. The timeskips in GT force it.
Probably Kanzenshuu's biggest Bulla fangirl. Current avatar: DBU Bulla as Sailor Princess Sadala, based on Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance

Dragon Ball Ultimate - 76 out of 150 chapters complete
JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Action Blue - link
Sailor Moon: Mindful of Love - link | Sailor Moon: Cosmic Dance - link

User avatar
Cetra
I Live Here
Posts: 3855
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Cetra » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:45 pm

Sandubadear wrote:Love seeing people getting upset because GT exists.
The rage outbursts from people will be bigger than that of Trunks if Super suddenly takes some turns of events they never considered possible. But at this point we have to wait and see.
"Citation needed."
"too lazy

feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"

User avatar
Sandubadear
I Live Here
Posts: 2152
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 8:39 am
Location: Space Amazon

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Sandubadear » Fri Aug 11, 2017 4:46 pm

Zamasu55 wrote:
Sandubadear wrote:Love seeing people getting upset because GT exists.
It isn't canon.
Sure bro.
"The life is the hardest video games of ever. Because you have only one life and the powers are kinda lame. And sometimes a stage takes years"

"The life is a game, the objective of the game is trying to find the objective of the game, and then, finish the game"
--by Ranely Jr

時空の主/齊天大聖
Lazy Xenoverse characters: Kuriza, Neko Majin Abra

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:00 pm

Alruneia wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:Around? That has to be the most piss-poor, backhanded, handwave placation I have ever seen in my life.
Their entire way of dealing with the issue was.....one word? That should piss the rabid GT and Super fans off. Toeis promised you love, took your money, gave you a kiss on the cheek and f@#ked off.
Both sides get nothing.
It says "around 789" because GT does not only take place in 789, but in 790 as well. The timeskips in GT force it.
Thats even worse, to reference my metaphor, you didn't even get a kiss.

That entire timeline just shows how much Toei love money and do not care about the fans petty squabbles over continuity.

User avatar
Baggie_Saiyan
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10315
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Location: Atlantis.

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Baggie_Saiyan » Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:01 pm

ArchedThunder wrote:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote: Yeah it's an event for celebration of Dragon Ball, here's the (ugly) visual for the event:
[spoiler]Image[/spoiler]
GT happened and it's foolish for them to acknowledge it didn't. If Super ends at EoZ then they can continue like they have but if DBS wants to go past EoZ then things will get tricky but given the immense success of DBS I think they'll be willing to sacrifice GT off.
It's simple, if the new era of Dragon Ball ever over laps with GT directly in terms of timeline they can just outright say GT is an "alternate world". That way they don't make GT fans feel like it's been invalidated and it still leaves them plenty of room for crossing them over in video games, or if they are really ballsy they can still do a special or something that crosses them over, though I'd rather they not.
Good point. But people thinking that they're gonna tie DBS into GT is what scratches my head. After each new arc in DBS they're getting further and further away from GT... How many extra wishes have we had? Pilaf crew basically have become tertiary characters and of course all the god forms and god stuff and then there's 17. Regardless of how they'll treat GT in the future for a fact we know Super will not link in with it.

User avatar
RedHeat
Regular
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 11:55 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by RedHeat » Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:02 pm

Lord Frieza wrote:
Alruneia wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:Around? That has to be the most piss-poor, backhanded, handwave placation I have ever seen in my life.
Their entire way of dealing with the issue was.....one word? That should piss the rabid GT and Super fans off. Toeis promised you love, took your money, gave you a kiss on the cheek and f@#ked off.
Both sides get nothing.
It says "around 789" because GT does not only take place in 789, but in 790 as well. The timeskips in GT force it.
Thats even worse, to reference my metaphor, you didn't even get a kiss.

That entire timeline just shows how much Toei love money and do not care about the fans petty squabbles over continuity.
Is that a good or bad thing?
Feels over Reals.

User avatar
perucho1990
I Live Here
Posts: 2361
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:04 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by perucho1990 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:03 pm

RedHeat wrote: Is that a good or bad thing?
Well, current Toei mentality is basically like the WWE(main priority is the money over what the fans want).

User avatar
Lord Frieza
I Live Here
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:36 pm

Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Official Announcement & Discussion Thread

Post by Lord Frieza » Fri Aug 11, 2017 5:09 pm

RedHeat wrote:
Lord Frieza wrote:
Alruneia wrote: It says "around 789" because GT does not only take place in 789, but in 790 as well. The timeskips in GT force it.
Thats even worse, to reference my metaphor, you didn't even get a kiss.

That entire timeline just shows how much Toei love money and do not care about the fans petty squabbles over continuity.
Is that a good or bad thing?
Depends on your perspective. While I prefer Super, I've watched and loved GT for years. I dont care, I've got my headcannon that they are different timelines and I'm happy. They dont have to kill the eachother to validate themselves to me.

However if your a rabid fanperson who has a left/right wing mentality, this is only going to causes a few long and boring forum cannon wars till Episode 103.

Post Reply