Baggie_Saiyan wrote:16x9.
Due to the fact that the show was shot in 1.37:1 and it was composed to be seen in 1.33:1 (4:3), 16:9 becomes a serious flaw. I’m really bored with saying the same thing all over again, so I will put it that way: I also strongly prefer 16:9 over 4:3. I would
LOVE to see Dragon Ball (and Z) in 16:9 without any picture loss nor shots decomposition, but I’m educated enough to understand that this is impossible and I’m grown enough to accept it.
Decision to crop the show was business - it had nothing to do with “artistic vision”.
By the way, a couple of days ago, my friend managed to contact one of the original animators who worked on Dragon Ball, Dragon Ball Movie 3, Dragon Ball Z, Dragon Ball Z Movies 1 and 2 (
In-Between Animation, Key Animation, Episode Director, Assistant Episode Director). IIRC, he said something around that: “
As an audience member and animator, I would rather see the show in it’s intended format.”. Even if I wouldn’t have my own brain, opinion of a person who actually draw the show always means more than opinion of the majority of people who have no idea how classic animation shows are produced. Learn from the masters, not from the masses.
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:No Grain.
Judging by the nature of the source material and extremely cheap method of grain filtering - it becomes another serious flaw. This was also discussed before and the situation looks the same as above.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moAy02J2fd8#t=205
Steve Franko is bigger authority than any majority of fans.
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:Bruce Falconer.
I’m not planning on starting any kind of war, but if you’d let me express my opinion: With all due respect, His Excellency Bruce Faulconer has nothing to do with the original Dragon Ball Z TV series, so having FUNimation's music it's not an argument to me.
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:Marathon Mode.
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:Awesome Menus.
The first thing I do after buying DVD/Blu-ray is remux audio/video streams that interest me into a separate mkv files. I hate all those menus and other options. They only make watching the show harder. They are completely useless to me.
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:Brilliant Artwork.
Metalwario64 wrote:There are many proportional and compositional issues with the artwork. The poses are awkward, and the style is overly rounded and bubbly looking.
This. I don’t like the colours and especially their contrast - it makes characters look like wax figures. Also, the linework is too static and symetric. It lacks this kind of “life” the original artwork had.
The main thing about this is that the artwork should fully represent the content. As you know, completely different drawing style, techniques and hardware was used to create this artwork. It makes it “
not original” and thus worthless to me. That's how Dragon Ball artwork should look:
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:& Brilliant Extra's.
If you talk about things like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaV73BsNSbE
I fully agree
Baggie_Saiyan wrote:There is also no way to prove these folks are 'ignorant'. I believe it's just a pathetic excuse 'purists' use to justify how well these are selling.
There is a way. It's called “basic logic”. Some things people say are just opinions, based mostly on their tastes, but some of things they say are facts based on what's written in the books. Do not mistake “opinion” with a “common rule”. Calling others with names is just a pathetic excuse to justify lack of interest in getting deeper understanding of things that are discussed here.
Sales mean nothing. We live in a system in which the word “truth” was replaced with the word “majority”. Would you say that 2 + 2 gives 7 if the majority of people would vote for it in a referendum?
