cuartas wrote:71 was rushed too then, 5 weeks since 66 and shimanuki never delivered terrible art shots from his part, to the contrary, he improved even more.iAnimationLover_ wrote:SaiyanGod117 wrote:Corrected Tate is still the best Tate, his art is far too ugly to go uncorrected, it can work for One Piece because most characters are already badly drawn. For a series like Dragon Ball, which heavily relies on aesthetics, his style really wouldn't fit, I still would like him to stay for Super.
I would like to disagree with the "His art is too ugly to go uncorrected" This was a rushed episode mate. i dont really judge someone's bad art in a filler episode either.
when the next arc comes around and hes given enough time to actually work on his episodes, then i criticize the bad parts. Like he had to work on other episodes in-between 65 and 72 (assistant AS on 66 and KA on 69) so of course its gonna be rough.
besides this episode was filler xd Check out his episode 11 or 38. His art is not "Ugly"
Tate is not rushed, it's just his style, OR... he's another kitano case, he can't work fine in short periods of time, quite ironic in a looser animator
Yep, he was totally NOT rushed: http://prntscr.com/do04sd
In shimanuki's case, he had 5 weeks, But he still delivered good work, wanna know why? Do you see him being the top key animator in his episode? (http://prntscr.com/do05g9)
Shimanuki = 5 weeks but 2nd to last key animator on his episode. (Which is not Neccissarily a bad thing, he still provided awesome corrections)
Tate = 6 weeks but worked on 2 episodes (66 and 69) as an Assistant Animation supervisor (66) and a key animator (69). But still insists on being the top key animator