If everyone in the show at some point has an "unusual" hair colour, how can he be a Sue for having it himself? Do people realize what they're even reading when doing these absurd tests? If Bulma's hair is originally purple than his isnt actually unusual.Saiga wrote:No, a Sue is about far more than their introduction. A Sue isn't a character that is only special when introduced, then immediately falls behind or has flaws pointed out.
I really like Blade's post about how Bulma's introduction is closer to being a Sue's than Trunks' is. It's quite true - Trunks' so called Mary Sue traits are a lot of things that aren't even out of place in Dragon Ball's universe.
Also, while everyone harps on about his so called "unique" / "unusual" hair colour, that's a straight up lie. His hair isn't unique at all - he's got the same hair colour as his mother, and it'd only be unique for a species he's not part of. Saiyan/Earthling hybrids are not pure Saiyans, and Dragon Ball already established Earthlings having such hair colour.
And Bulma being a Sue? Smh..... really? Shes the most flawed reaccuring human character in the series. Blue hair alone shouldnt be enough for the entire generalization.
If any character is a legit Sue its Beerus, and Gotenks. Not because of some arbitrary abstract questionare but by their behaviour: (the actual basis of reasoning for applicable claims for the Sue label.) and contrast to the established knowns of the universe & and their personalties reflecting underearned statures.