Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.
User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Thu Jun 18, 2015 5:42 pm

Leveling him up the way they did and putting him in the same role as every other fodder character was a bad move. A very, very bad move.
But he was already leveled up, he was Buu reincarnated.

You won't get an argument that Gohan has more going on, but you still know the kind of person Uub is. Sure it's

Max and Furiosa were both bland. The only developed character in the movie, who is still a stock character, was Nux. That's also the problem with Uub, he's a stock bland character. It's not that he doesn't have a personality, he just doesn't have a flashy and distinct one.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Avery
Beyond-the-Beyond Newbie
Posts: 364
Joined: Fri May 01, 2015 1:18 am
Location: Iraq

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by Avery » Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:12 pm

Why did they even reduce him into a kid? It made him even more shallow.
An angry Final Fantasy fan wrote: And after all the outrage, when I'm ready, I'll go out on to GameStop and buy a Persona 5 copy. And when my mother finds me investing my precious time trying to bond with this hot anime girl, I'll look straight into her eyes and say "but have you looked at the menu screen? have you actually seen the menu screen? In that very moment, she knows. She fucking knows. As she handles me the nugget pieces she previously cooked for me, she leaves my room with these words: "Persona 5 is the true savior of the JRPG".
VegettoEX wrote: In a blunt nutshell, no-one wants to read bullshit. Don't post bullshit. Be a cool person that posts cool things that other people would actually want to read. Don't be Zamasu from episode 63 talking to himself.

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by Rocketman » Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:24 pm

Goku becoming a kid again is only interesting if it means he drops waay down in power, forcing everybody else to step up. As-is, the only thing it does is cut out Instant Transmission to make the DB hunt a very slightly more challenging time-waster.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:34 pm

ABED wrote:
Leveling him up the way they did and putting him in the same role as every other fodder character was a bad move. A very, very bad move.
But he was already leveled up, he was Buu reincarnated.

You won't get an argument that Gohan has more going on, but you still know the kind of person Uub is. Sure it's

Max and Furiosa were both bland. The only developed character in the movie, who is still a stock character, was Nux. That's also the problem with Uub, he's a stock bland character. It's not that he doesn't have a personality, he just doesn't have a flashy and distinct one.
His skills in EoZ aren't refined, and you can make the argument that he has the potential to reach Kid Buu's power and above, but is a long road away from that during the time he's introduced, triggering his latent strength only when enraged, similarly to Kid Gohan. Aside from being Buu's reincarnation, we honestly don't know anything about him, his powers, his background as a fighter, etc.

All I remember was thinking Furiosa was cool. But maybe I'm biased cause she's a strong woman with apparent flaws. Felt human, but powerful. Max was just...quiet. It's a very different sort of story than DB; reminded me more of Fist of the North Star in its character portrayals (I think that anime was actually inspired by Mad Max, if I'm not mistaken).
Avery wrote:Why did they even reduce him into a kid? It made him even more shallow.
The audience that grew watching DB were aging, and I assume GT wanted to target the new generation at the time. Hence, Kid Goku. Also, add Pan in there for the girls.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
Rocketman
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10799
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:17 pm

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by Rocketman » Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:53 pm

If you didn't like Fury Road, you are an objectively horrible person and you should at least be whipped.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 7:57 pm

I thought the movie was fucking weird. In a good way. I liked it a lot.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Thu Jun 18, 2015 9:39 pm

His skills in EoZ aren't refined, and you can make the argument that he has the potential to reach Kid Buu's power and above, but is a long road away from that during the time he's introduced, triggering his latent strength only when enraged, similarly to Kid Gohan. Aside from being Buu's reincarnation, we honestly don't know anything about him, his powers, his background as a fighter, etc.
Sure, but it's not out of the realm of possibility that Uub would become refined and more powerful in the 10 years between Z and GT.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
SingleFringe&Sparks
I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: Mt. Paozu/East District

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by SingleFringe&Sparks » Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:05 pm

fadeddreams5 wrote:
SSJ2FutureGohan wrote:How is GT Uub a "god awful" character? He may not be developed as much as he could've, but it's not like Toei completely ruined his personality or anything.. His design isn't that bad either, in my opinion. I don't care much for Super Uub though.
Can you name a more bland character from DB/DBZ?

Toei didn't ruin his personality; they gave him none.
Uub didn't have a personality in GT at all, he was just the naive stalling-for-Goku character Piccolo became in the Buu saga.
Zephyr wrote:The fandom's collective fetishizing of "moments" is also ridiculous to me. No, not everyone needs a fucking "shine" moment. If that's all you want, then all you want is fanservice, rather than an actual coherent story. And of course those aren't mutually exclusive; you could have a coherent story with "shine" moments! But if a story is perfectly coherent (and I'm really not seeing any compelling arguments that this one is anything but, despite constantly recurring, really poorly reasoned, attempts to argue otherwise), and you're bemoaning the lack of "shine" moments as a reason for the story's poor quality, then you're letting your thirst for "shine" moments obfuscate your ability to detect basic storytelling when it's right in front of you.

User avatar
SSJ Human
Regular
Posts: 627
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:35 pm

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by SSJ Human » Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:12 am

SingleFringe&Sparks wrote:
fadeddreams5 wrote:
SSJ2FutureGohan wrote:How is GT Uub a "god awful" character? He may not be developed as much as he could've, but it's not like Toei completely ruined his personality or anything.. His design isn't that bad either, in my opinion. I don't care much for Super Uub though.
Can you name a more bland character from DB/DBZ?

Toei didn't ruin his personality; they gave him none.
Uub didn't have a personality in GT at all, he was just the naive stalling-for-Goku character Piccolo became in the Buu saga.
I honestly don't know why people keep trying to get Uub in anything. Yes he was the designated successor at the end of the manga, but I have no fondness towards him whatsoever. He seemed like a nice guy in GT in the thirteen episodes he was in, but people keep wanting him from the EOZ and I don't get it.

I could understand Pan but not him. We got to see a little bit more of her in EOZ and in GT so I understand the fondness for her.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:01 am

ABED wrote:
His skills in EoZ aren't refined, and you can make the argument that he has the potential to reach Kid Buu's power and above, but is a long road away from that during the time he's introduced, triggering his latent strength only when enraged, similarly to Kid Gohan. Aside from being Buu's reincarnation, we honestly don't know anything about him, his powers, his background as a fighter, etc.
Sure, but it's not out of the realm of possibility that Uub would become refined and more powerful in the 10 years between Z and GT.
That 10 year gap in itself was stupid, imo.
I honestly don't know why people keep trying to get Uub in anything. Yes he was the designated successor at the end of the manga, but I have no fondness towards him whatsoever. He seemed like a nice guy in GT in the thirteen episodes he was in, but people keep wanting him from the EOZ and I don't get it.

I could understand Pan but not him. We got to see a little bit more of her in EOZ and in GT so I understand the fondness for her.
As I mentioned, he's a blank slate. I visualize an awesome character. Most people really trust Toriyama with him. I also trust he'd create something way better than that GT thing.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:04 am

That 10 year gap in itself was stupid, imo.
Seriously? Now that is a point of contention?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:32 am

ABED wrote:
That 10 year gap in itself was stupid, imo.
Seriously? Now that is a point of contention?
Well it is. The characters were old enough as it was by EoZ.

It would have been nice to see the initial interactions between Uub and Goku, as well as more of EoZ Pan. That jump was a dumb move, imo.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:49 pm

Well it is. The characters were old enough as it was by EoZ.

It would have been nice to see the initial interactions between Uub and Goku, as well as more of EoZ Pan. That jump was a dumb move, imo.
Just because they were old enough doesn't make it dumb. What did they hurt by skipping over a couple years other than some more interactions with Uub? Is it really so important to see that early relationship that you consider an innocuous 10 year jump DUMB?
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 1:16 pm

ABED wrote:
Well it is. The characters were old enough as it was by EoZ.

It would have been nice to see the initial interactions between Uub and Goku, as well as more of EoZ Pan. That jump was a dumb move, imo.
Just because they were old enough doesn't make it dumb. What did they hurt by skipping over a couple years other than some more interactions with Uub? Is it really so important to see that early relationship that you consider an innocuous 10 year jump DUMB?
That initial interaction with Uub and his growth as a fighter were important to flesh out the character. Skipping forward the way they did resulted in so many missed opportunities. Not just with him, but EoZ Pan too.

It's as if 4 year old Gohan was introduced at the end of DB, but the beginning of DBZ started 10 years later with him already grown up and fighting alongside Tien, Yamcha, Krillin, etc. Also, add no character-specific arcs to add insult to injury. We just have to assume he's already met everyone, and is a strong fighter cause he's Goku's son. That is beyond dumb.

And yeah, I don't like the character designs and old appearances of the humans. Really, I could go on and on about GT.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:47 pm

That initial interaction with Uub and his growth as a fighter were important to flesh out the character. Skipping forward the way they did resulted in so many missed opportunities. Not just with him, but EoZ Pan too.
You don't need to stay with them at the end of Z in order to see them grow a lot. Considering Pan's age, there's a LOT of room for growth.
It's as if 4 year old Gohan was introduced at the end of DB, but the beginning of DBZ started 10 years later with him already grown up and fighting alongside Tenshinhan, Yamcha, Krillin, etc. Also, add no character-specific arcs to add insult to injury. We just have to assume he's already met everyone, and is a strong fighter cause he's Goku's son. That is beyond dumb.
Not remotely like that. The point was that Uub trained with Goku during peace time. It was uneventful. It's not like it was ever implied that they did anything more than train. It's more like cutting from Goku's victory over Piccolo to 5 years later and we the audience meet Gohan. We don't need to see Gohan when he's born or see Chichi not allow Gohan to train. There's little excitement in that, so you cut to several years later AND then show the growth of the character.

There's nothing that implies Uub had already met Goku's friends at the beginning of GT.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
fadeddreams5
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5267
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by fadeddreams5 » Fri Jun 19, 2015 3:55 pm

ABED wrote: Not remotely like that. The point was that Uub trained with Goku during peace time. It was uneventful. It's not like it was ever implied that they did anything more than train.
It was uneventful because the writers decided that time period was uneventful. If they decided otherwise, we'd have a lot of material to work with. Same goes with the 7 year period after the Cell Games, but that's another story.
It's more like cutting from Goku's victory over Piccolo to 5 years later and we the audience meet Gohan. We don't need to see Gohan when he's born or see Chichi not allow Gohan to train. There's little excitement in that, so you cut to several years later AND then show the growth of the character.
It's different because the time period you're describing wouldn't provide anything relevant concerning Gohan, only Goku and Chi Chi; he'd be too young for them to have anything to work with. At 4-5 years old, Gohan actually has a certain level of reasoning (he seems to have an above average IQ), continues growing from then on, and we as viewers witness that development. A lot of the story is focused on him.

We missed 10 years of Uub's life. If they decided he only trained during those 10 years, it makes that large time gap even more stupid. When we meet him, he's already reached a peak in physical strength, but we never know his struggles to attain anything. We never met him at all, even though the series takes place after Z. We just have to accept what we have in front of us.
There's nothing that implies Uub had already met Goku's friends at the beginning of GT.
So in 10 years, he never met anyone, at all? He was just alone with Goku all the time? You may be right, but that's even more silly.
"Dragon Ball once became a thing of the past to me, but after that, I got angry about the live action movie, re-wrote an entire movie script, and now I'm complaining about the quality of the new TV anime. It seems Dragon Ball has grown on me so much that I can't leave it alone." - Akira Toriyama on Dragon Ball Super

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:13 pm

So in 10 years, he never met anyone, at all? He was just alone with Goku all the time? You may be right, but that's even more silly.
He met people, just not Goku's friends. It's implied that Goku rarely if ever saw his family during that time. I'm not overly fond of Goku not being with his family in 10 years, but I don't find it out of the realm of possibility that he never took Uub to meet his friends
We missed 10 years of Uub's life. If they decided he only trained during those 10 years, it makes that large time gap even more stupid. When we meet him, he's already reached a peak in physical strength, but we never know his struggles to attain anything. We never met him at all, even though the series takes place after Z. We just have to accept what we have in front of us.
His struggles were his training. It's not like Goku or his friends where their biggest leaps were during times of crises. Uub had a ton of natural ability because he was a reincarnation of Buu. What we meet in front of us is just a very strong character . You keep saying "that's even more stupid" and that's not the case at all. How is that more stupid that the gap is large and it consisted of training. All I keep reading is "GT is dumb" and some desperate attempts to justify bashing every little thing including a harmless time skip. It's a 10 year gap where little happened beyond simple training.
It's different because the time period you're describing wouldn't provide anything relevant concerning Gohan
It's only different in your mind, but not in essence. Uub simply trained for a while. It's the same because there's little of relevance that happens during that time that couldn't either be discussed or shown in flashback for an episode. It was an era of extended peace, no different than the 7 year gap between Buu and Cell. Nothing that relevant happens during the GT gap other than a strong character gets stronger - riveting!

It's not as though placing a story earlier would've meant more story, it would just be a different story.
Last edited by ABED on Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
Puto
I Live Here
Posts: 2668
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:40 am
Location: Portugal, Oeiras

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by Puto » Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:16 pm

It was a 5 year skip between the end of Z and the start of GT, not 10.
Blue wrote:I love how Season 2 is so off color even the box managed to be so.

User avatar
ABED
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 20481
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:23 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by ABED » Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:23 pm

Puto wrote:It was a 5 year skip between the end of Z and the start of GT, not 10.
I'm sure it was 10. Pan was 3 at the end of Z and a teen when we meet her in GT.
The biggest truths aren't original. The truth is ketchup. It's Jim Belushi. Its job isn't to blow our minds. It's to be within reach.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take - Wayne Gretzky" - Michael Scott
Happiness is climate, not weather.

User avatar
TheGmGoken
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 10592
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:19 pm
Location: Capsule Corps

Re: Would you have preferred Adult Goku in GT?

Post by TheGmGoken » Fri Jun 19, 2015 4:27 pm

ABED wrote:
Puto wrote:It was a 5 year skip between the end of Z and the start of GT, not 10.
I'm sure it was 10. Pan was 3 at the end of Z and a teen when we meet her in GT.
English dub onlyonly and she's 4 at EOZ. Making her 9-10 GT.

Post Reply