Why isn't Zamasu in Episode 75/76?

[Lord Beerus]

...Or maybe it's just one big nostalgia dump, and Zamasu was too recent to be included.

[Merged Zamasu]

...Or maybe it's just one big nostalgia dump, and Zamasu was too recent to be included.

But even if Zamasu were to appear, how would that ruin nostalgia? Like, Freeza, Cell, Buu, Nappa etc..., they would still be there, regardless of Zamasu's presence. Furthermore, it would have been interesting to see Zamasu interact with the other villains. They did that for Cell. They apparently chose not to do it with Zamasu.

Seriosly, nobody would have said "Wow, why did they add Zamasu in this ep? It totally ruined the nostalgia!!! Even though my favourite choldhood villains are still there...!".

[omaro34]

lol because Zamasu was just recently defeated and these are villains from Z and the original DB.

Will you stop using that excuse? I seriously wonder if some of you have trouble reading. I keep repeating the same things over and over again because there is always the one guy who uses arguments which i have already countered.

Drop your Zamasu pom-poms for once. Will you stop with these snarky, arrogant comments? I don't give a damn if you have seen that excuse before, that has nothing to do with someone's literacy. If you feel that I haven't given you the answer you seek, don't respond to my comment with something unnecessary.

I guarantee you with your extreme fanboyism that if Zamasu's image did indeed appear in episode 75/76 and he was defeated by Goku and Krillin you will find a way to complain about that too and make a thread about it.

[Merged Zamasu]

lol because Zamasu was just recently defeated and these are villains from Z and the original DB.

Will you stop using that excuse? I seriously wonder if some of you have trouble reading. I keep repeating the same things over and over again because there is always the one guy who uses arguments which i have already countered.

Drop your Zamasu pom-poms for once. Will you stop with these snarky, arrogant comments? I don't give a damn if you have seen that excuse before, that has nothing to do with someone's literacy. If you feel that I haven't given you the answer you seek, don't respond to my comment with something unnecessary.

I guarantee you with your extreme fanboyism that if Zamasu's image did indeed appear in episode 75/76 and he was defeated by Goku and Krillin you will find a way to complain about that too and make a thread about it.

I am still waiting for your counter-argument.

Oh wait, you don't have one.

Will you stop with these snarky, arrogant comments?

You might consider taking your own advice.

I don't give a damn if you have seen that excuse before,

Clearly you do.

Have the humility to say you concede if you've got nothing more to say on the argument. Flaming is far worse.

[Kanassa]

...Or maybe it's just one big nostalgia dump, and Zamasu was too recent to be included.

But even if Zamasu were to appear, how would that ruin nostalgia? Like, Freeza, Cell, Buu, Nappa etc..., they would still be there, regardless of Zamasu's presence. Furthermore, it would have been interesting to see Zamasu interact with the other villains. They did that for Cell. They apparently chose not to do it with Zamasu.

Seriosly, nobody would have said "Wow, why did they add Zamasu in this ep? It totally ruined the nostalgia!!! Even though my favourite choldhood villains are still there...!".

Nobody is saying that Zamasu being there would ruin anything, only that from an in-universe perspective the villains here are manifestations of Krillin's fear, and from an out-of-universe perspective the point of the episode is a nostalgia dump for Z and the original Dragonball, meaning it's unlikely that Zamasu will be there. He could be, but he has a low chance. Iit's aso why the likes of Beerus and Hit are not there.

And the villains will probably have little interaction outside of taunting Krillin and Goku (Also, is it just me or are they for some reason fucking giants?)

[Merged Zamasu]

Nobody is saying that Zamasu being there would ruin anything, only that from an in-universe perspective the villains here are manifestations of Krillin's fear

Actually, Black Goku wouldn't be so out of place.

Imagine how shocked Krillin would look like if he saw his best friend turned evil. Even if he didn't get much screen-time during the Future Trunks' arc, it's illogical to believe Krillin wasn't left shocked by Black, like everyone else. The guy who appeard to be the dear friend Krillin had known since childhood was now murdering innocents. It would be very, very interesting to see Krillin himself interact with Black, the evil version of his best friend.

[Kanassa]

Nobody is saying that Zamasu being there would ruin anything, only that from an in-universe perspective the villains here are manifestations of Krillin's fear

Actually, Black Goku wouldn't be so out of place.

Imagine how shocked Krillin would look like if he saw his best friend turned evil. Even if he didn't get much screen-time during the Future Trunks' arc, it's illogical to believe Krillin wasn't left shocked by Black, like everyone else. The guy who appeard to be the dear friend Krillin had known since childhood was now murdering innocents. It would be very, very interesting to see Krillin himself interact with Black, the evil version of his best friend.

While admittedly it would be interesting to see that, Krillin really never met Black. He saw him put up a fight against Goku and heard he did terrible things, not really anything to leave as much as an impression as the other villains though.

[omaro34]

You might consider taking your own advice

Where have I ever disrespected anyone on here ever? You came at me rather viciously for no reason after my nostalgic comment. You don't see me bringing my favorite every chance I get. Your Zamasu propaganda nonsense is something you should seriously consider reevaluating, and if no one will bring it up I will. Hell, I've seen you post about Zamasu on threads where he isn't even being remotely discussed.

Clearly you do.

Have the humility to say you concede if you've got nothing more to say on the argument. Flaming is far worse.

LMAO and how did you come to that conclusion? Once again, proving my point. Drop the pom-poms, get off character for once and drop the pathetic act.

[VegettoEX]

Conversation has more than run its course, and the offending party has been dealt with. Please carry on elsewhere!