As I say, really only Bulma, and briefly Videl, were major players in the main cast... This isn't about girls not fighting, though that is also pretty crazy (why not have one of the fighting characters be a girl? Or two, even. And how about having more than one brainy character?). Like anything, there's far more to Dragon Ball than fighting, and reducing it to "It's just about fighting" is how you end up with stuff like Z movie 6, which is one of the most shallow pieces of media I've ever consumed... But Dragon Ball is a martial arts anime. It's a battle manga. If no girls are allowed to fight, then... Well, it's much akin to if no girls were allowed to play card games in Yu-Gi-Oh, or if no girls were allowed to fight crime in a superhero movie.Jord wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 12:45 pmGirls are allowed, they just used their brains instead of their brawn like Bulma. Doesn't necessarily mean that they were worse than the male cast, they just used different talents.Robo4900 wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 9:39 am Ah yes, because if it's a boys' show, then it is a WRONG decision for girls to be major players in the main cast?
Seriously... "Show aimed at boys" doesn't mean "No girls allowed".
Sure, and it's also loaded with sexual harassment -- and in a few cases, outright attempted sexual assault -- played for laughs. Are you gonna say that was actually a good idea, just because the show was popular?Jord wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 12:45 pmSince Dragon Ball is one of most if not the most successful anime of all time, it appears the people working on Dragon Ball were pretty good at what they were doing and knowing exactly what their audience wants. Guess that notion is not so ridiculous.That's a ridiculous notion. It's a notion that is likely widely subscribed-to by many people working on Dragon Ball over the years, but it's a crazy one.
A good thing can also be a flawed thing, deeply flawed in numerous respects, which can often be tied to fundamental attitudes of the people who made it. You can't just excuse any attitude as "Well, they made a successful thing, so I guess they had the right idea after all"... By the same token, George Lucas did nothing wrong with the Star Wars prequels 'cause they were wildly successful movies. It's a ridiculous line of thought, and one that achieves nothing other than dismissing criticism with an effortless, thoughtless handwave.
What does "Mattered in the end" even mean?Jord wrote: Wed May 27, 2020 12:45 pmSure you can, and how many of those men actually mattered in the end? Goku, Vegeta, Gohan, perhaps (future) Trunks, although he sure fizzled out fast. Relevancy isn't decided by gender but by writing.Congratulations, you have successfully listed all of the women in Dragon Ball. If I was to do that with all the men, I'd have a post so long, Kunzait would call it excessive.
Heck, a large part of the male cast was cast aside after the Frieza saga.Meanwhile characters like Bulma and 18 still played large parts in shaping the story line.
And, most critically, how is it relevant?
There are five women in the main or supporting cast of Dragon Ball, only two of whom could really be called leads for any portion of the story, and one of them doesn't show up until the very last arc, and is only a lead for the first little bit of it.
As for the men...
Goku, Piccolo, Kuririn, Yamucha, Tenshinhan, Gohan, Vegeta, Roshi, Trunks, Oolong, Dende, Karin, Kaio, Grand Kaio, Kaioshin, Kibito, South Kaio, West Kaio, arguably #8 and Bardock...
We have all the major arc villains/antagonists except for Mai and one of the seven Evil Dragons -- Pilaf, Shuu/Soba, Silver, Blue, Yellow, White, Red, Piccolo Daimao, Raditz, Nappa, Freeza, Zarbon, Dodoria, #17, #19-20, Cell, Boo, Baby, Super #17, six out of the seven Evil Dragons, Beers, Champa, Black/Zamas, Broly...
All of these characters could be considered major players in at least one major story arc (if you're allowed to consider Videl and #18, then I get to have Yamucha, Tenshinhan, Dende, etc.). And this is just off the top of my head. I can't remember any names, but aren't there like 70 other fighters, plus like 10 or 20 more gods introduced in the TOP, and only like ten, maybe fifteen, of the TOP lot are girls? IIRC no new women were introduced among all the introductions we got in the U6 tournament aside from Vados...
It's perfectly fine to say you don't mind the lack of women in Dragon Ball (I'll judge you for it, but it's a somewhat understandable position to hold for a franchise that's brought you a lot of joy over the years), but denying that there is a lack of women in the franchise is just ignorant. And trying to belittle this by saying "well, some of the guys didn't matter much either" is no argument against this, and barely makes any sense anyway... It's very much a Whataboutism argument.




