True but Broly was incredibly well animated and enjoyable to watch, plus had engaging central character arcs. The same can't be said of RoF, at least not anywhere near the same extent. Broly doesn't throw out a huge amount of original ideas, but I always applaud it for actually trying to change our perceptions of Broly as a general concept, proving that he can be more than a one-note steroid monster that the Z Movie sequels exaggerated him into. I get that you're probably going for Devil's Advocate here though.TheSaiyanGod wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 10:07 pmCan't you say exactly the same thing about Broly movie? With even more fanservice by introducing two popular non-canon characters into the original story (one of which being the absolute portrait of how people view Dragon Ball) to appeal the fans?LoganForkHands73 wrote: Mon Dec 28, 2020 4:40 pm It encapsulates every negative stereotype normies associate with Dragon Ball: two beefy screaming guys changing their hair/skin colours and punching and firing blasts at each other repeatedly until one falls down
I think RoF encapsulates how people perceive "boring DBZ". There's no sense of tension or progression in Goku vs. Freeza, it's literally just two strong guys wailing on each other in the sky for like ten minutes, the choreography is as flat as a pancake. I like to think Broly represents "hype DBZ", an actually thrilling, epic battle with great visual storytelling. We see the Saiyans push each other to insane extremes, so it actually looks and feels like a fight between gods.


