Lord Beerus wrote:AjayLikesGaming, which animators underneath Toei's umbrella would like to see animate bits and pieces of Super? I mean, personally what I've seen so far animation from Super hasn't been bad, but it certainly could be much better.
I think everyone (with the exception of
Kei17) would absolutely love
Naotoshi Shida to have a really strong presence in Super's production. His work just blows my mind, though I think it sometimes strays from what makes
Dragon Ball unique. His work is very fluid,
where the beams and characters move loosely, almost like water. Personally, I really love that, but I know it's not to everyone's tastes.
Other than Shida, I really enjoyed what Takeo Ide and Masahiro Shimanuki did in the latest film. In fact, most of the staff who worked on that seemed pretty talented, even if the storyboarding was pretty poor. Likewise, Yuuichi Hamano has done some great work on
PreCure, also working on
Battle of Gods, too. Yuki Hayashi is solid, though I have absolutely no idea what they're doing now. Last thing I saw was their work on
Kekkai Sensen. Would be great if they were involved!
Either way, I have faith in Kimitoshi Chioka to work wonders! Taking a look at the parts of
Battle of Gods that he storyboarded, his touch is clear as day. Nothing is really being animated other than mouth flaps, but the compositions look beautiful. Really creative angles, mixed with slight motion seems to be a favourite technique of his. It makes the most mundane scenes feel dynamic.
SMKirbyZX wrote:Geez people, the animation is not that bad. While I will admit that it isn't the highest of quality, it certainly isn't what some of you guys make it out to be.
I don't think anyone's really eternally damned it, have they? We're all picking on a second long clip of poor animation. We still have the promising Super Saiyan transformation, Trunks' okay looking punches, and some pretty consistently on-model characters.
Nothing has quite screamed Sailor Moon Crystal yet! It probably seems like some people are being overly negative, but remember we have pretty much nothing else to pick at, so it's only natural that we focus on what news we're given. Sadly, the new parts aren't particularly great. Give it time, positivity will return when the topic merits it.
Araki wrote:You said things that actually aren't very indicative and forgot the main element there: series' length.
I really don't like your tone, especially when you seem to have missed that I was simply saying anime as a whole isn't all bad. That had nothing to do with anything you've just thrown at me, but thanks, I guess?
I actually don't disagree with much of what you've said, but that really wasn't the point of my post.
Bullza's implication seemed to be that anime as a medium was bad on the whole. I was merely pointing out there are plenty of shows that look great. Of course there are exceptions, and of course lengthy series are going to be inconsistent. To think otherwise would be ridiculous, but that has nothing to do with the point I was making. He was generalising, and I was proving otherwise.
Your comparisons of shows under the same studio don't really hold any weight, though. Different directors, different staff, different animators, different budgets. As I said, so many details to go by. You don't just judge by the studio's name alone. That hardly negates anything I said. If anything, that strengthens the argument that it's the details you pay attention to.
Heading to bed now. Will tackle any replies in the morning.