Draconic wrote:Baby is supposed to be the embodiment of the Saiyan past coming back to bite them in the ass. Great idea right? So why must Goku be the one to solve this conflict? He has nothing to do with anything his race did. He is about as far removed from the violent nature of the Saiyans as you can get. Not only that, but Goku finally defeats Baby by achieving the full potential of a Saiyan: a Super Saiyan-Oozaru hybrid, pretty much validating everything his enemy was on about. It also doesn't help that he no longer wants to be associated to that race (especially when he accepted his blood-filled heritage by the Freeza battle), yet has no problems abusing it's characteristics to win.
Then there are the Evil Dragons, born from abusing the Dragon Balls. Guess how many wishes benefited Goku? None. The first wish he personally makes is to revive the father of a boy he just met, who just got in the crossfires of a "war" he had nothing to do with. Then you have the wish to revive him after getting killed by Raditz, which is done because he's literally Earth's only hope for survival. The only selfish wish he makes is having Buu reincarnated in order to fight him, but by the start of the arc, Uub is so irrelevant that it counts as a fluke. Why must it be Goku the one who single-handedly defeats every single Dragon? Why must he literally die for everybody else's sins at the end? It makes no thematic sense.
I've seen praise for this more "mature" Goku, who takes stuff seriously and assumes more responsabilities, but when he is practically forced into those conflicts he has no reason to feel anything about, he just comes out looking like a Messiah. That not only is poorly representing his character as a whole, but also shitting on the original story's final arc/ending, where he is actively searching for a replacement, to the point he outright wishes one into existence.
I do agree that Goku isn't the best of fits to defeat Baby but I think the fact Baby uses the body of Vegeta, the guy who did embody them completely not too long ago as a means of exacting revenge on them kind of trumps it. Also, SS4 isn't the embodiment of a Saiyan, if anything, it's kind of the opposite. To become an SS4, you need to be a pissed off, murderous ape monster and get control over yourself in this state of mind, something none of the Saiyan's from the past could to the level of making Oozaru basically "human".
The point of the Dragons coming isn't because of how they benefit Goku, it's the fact the cast uses them to fix every problem they come across. This gets especially problematic in the later arcs where Cell and Boo shouldn't come to be but do simply because the cast are more interested in having a challenge first then using the DBs to fix things once the world narrowly avoids annihilation or outright destruction like in the Boo arc. Goku beating all of them doesn't imply they're there to solely benefit him, they exist because they're meant to be used sparringly and then the cast abuse them as a be all end all fix the more time passes.
The original ending isn't Goku finding a replacement, it's him finding a way to not be bored as shit anymore. Ignoring the new material, Goku does nothing for 10 years but wait around for his last, greatest opponent to show up in the form of Oob. Piccolo and Vegeta's dialogue supports the fact that Goku is far more interested in getting Oob ready so he can use him as a way to stave off boredom and whatever role as a replacement as Earth savior is like number 4 or 5 on the list of things Goku wants out of him.
When someone tells you, "Don't present your opinion as fact," what they're actually saying is, "Don't present your opinion with any conviction. Because I don't like your opinion, and I want to be able to dismiss it as easily as possible." Don't fall for it.
How the Black Arc Should End (by Lightbing!):