Like I said in the first paragraph of my post, there are differences between BT2 and BT3 (and BT1, but that's just obvious), just like there are differences between RB and RB2. People say BT3's gameplay was better than BT2's, but really BT2 made a much larger step-up than BT3 did from its predecessor, and what BT3 did do just made the combat a lot more cheap and broken.Bluebolt wrote:I'm saying this in the nicest way possible. I'm not trying to be a jackass, but honestly I see no difference in the core aspect of BT 1 2 and 3. It's just my analogy perhaps you're seeing something I'm not. Anyways to each to his owndbboxkaifan wrote:I don't mean to be rude, but have you people ever played Budokai Tenkaichi 1, 2 and 3? They're not the same.
'To each his own' is irrelevant here, since what the game's actually 'are' are not opinion but 'fact'. There are differences between the games; whether they are huge differences or not is another aspect, however if you were arguing with people who knew and cared what they were talking about then they'd have a lot over you.
What you're trying to say however is that the formula or style is the same, and it's true. It's been true in fact from Spike for the past 6 or so years, excluding Ultimate trash. I really don't like all this HD collection business personally, I think Tenkaichi fanboys should move on and allow the franchise to evolve. I mean, when was the last time we had something which was new, and which was actually good?
(Damn, I was meant to post this before, but I didn't realise it didn't go through since it informed me of that thing it does when another pos has already been posted..)