What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I agree with the sentiment that it's a significant flaw if a series takes multiple volumes to get interesting. And Water 7 starts at volume 34, it is waaay to much to expect someone to wait over 30 volumes before they see something interesting.
So no, for anyone who dropped the series before than, that's being fair. It's up to the work to keep people interested enough to continue reading.
So no, for anyone who dropped the series before than, that's being fair. It's up to the work to keep people interested enough to continue reading.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!
- DragonBalllKaiHD
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:37 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Look at Naruto. It has a better pace and story. The characters are just as great as Dragon Ball is. What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga. Story-wise, it really picks up at Chuuin Exam arc, and things get really interesting from there on. And you only have to read up to Volume 8 to capture your interest, unlike One Piece which can take a while to get your attention. That's a lot of time to invest something that is so ridiculously long. What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru's #1 biggest fan
A piece of animation is a beauty of art.
A piece of animation is a beauty of art.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Hehehe, now I'd really disagree with that... Part II just hasn't been as good, and it went downhill after Pain. The war arc is just atrocious, and I'm only reading because I really don't like leaving series unfinished.
But for that I'd say the first arc (Land of Waves) is strong enough to keep most people interested. I also think it's better than the Chunin Exams.
But for that I'd say the first arc (Land of Waves) is strong enough to keep most people interested. I also think it's better than the Chunin Exams.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!
- The Monkey King
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:53 am
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Naruto took a dive in Part II imo. The Pain arc was good but over all, meh.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Look at Naruto. It has a better pace and story. The characters are just as great as Dragon Ball is. What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga. Story-wise, it really picks up at Chuuin Exam arc, and things get really interesting from there on. And you only have to read up to Volume 8 to capture your interest, unlike One Piece which can take a while to get your attention. That's a lot of time to invest something that is so ridiculously long. What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
This war has been stretched for so long, there have been so many ass pulls, death is almost as cheap as it is in Dragon Ball, characters making illogical 180 degree turns in what they stand for and
Spoiler:
And I like that One Piece is long, if it means more quality reading material for me I see no reason to complain, unlike Naruto of which I want to see end soooooooo badly.
Then I guess it's a really good thing One Piece doesn't take take anywhere near 30 volumes to get interestingSaiga wrote:I agree with the sentiment that it's a significant flaw if a series takes multiple volumes to get interesting. And Water 7 starts at volume 34, it is waaay to much to expect someone to wait over 30 volumes before they see something interesting.
Honestly if you're not getting into One Piece when Mihawk appears (volume 6) or at Arlong Park (volume 8 ), I don't think One Piece is for you, and that's a shame.
- helsinkirocks
- Not-So-Newbie
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:08 am
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Let me make it clear, I didn't mean it took up to Enies Lobby to be interesting, I meant, by that point you can make a pretty fair assessment of the series. Basically, everything up-to-and-including the Alabasta arc could be compared to Dragon Ball. Post-Alabasta is more akin to "Z", as in it is more large scale, with more action, and world building. You wouldn't read Dragon Ball, and then have that form your opinion on Z.
I was "interested" in One Piece from the moment I began watching, and I thought it was pretty good. The climax during Alabasta sold it as one of my favorites, and basically every arc after just got better and better, until it finally solidified as my favorites. It was a bit of a slow burn, but I never felt like I had to "force myself" into reading or watching more, like I did with say- Naruto. I read the first 8 volumes, and it really felt like a chore. I've been thinking of giving it another chance, but it'll be a difficult sell.
I've been interested in Bleach, I've gotten into it more than I have Naruto, and I'm only on volume 2 or 3 (I think). Neither of them come close to One Piece in my mind.
I was "interested" in One Piece from the moment I began watching, and I thought it was pretty good. The climax during Alabasta sold it as one of my favorites, and basically every arc after just got better and better, until it finally solidified as my favorites. It was a bit of a slow burn, but I never felt like I had to "force myself" into reading or watching more, like I did with say- Naruto. I read the first 8 volumes, and it really felt like a chore. I've been thinking of giving it another chance, but it'll be a difficult sell.
I've been interested in Bleach, I've gotten into it more than I have Naruto, and I'm only on volume 2 or 3 (I think). Neither of them come close to One Piece in my mind.
- DragonBalllKaiHD
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:37 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
The problem isn't how interesting it is, but how long One Piece really is. Even Enies Lobby, as interesting the arc was, even that is taking way too long before the thunder god shows up.
Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru's #1 biggest fan
A piece of animation is a beauty of art.
A piece of animation is a beauty of art.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
How does that make sense? Imagine that after reading those volumes, things just keep getting better and better, until you find One Piece one of the best mangas out there and you even gain renewed appreciation for the early volumes since they establish stuff that is going to be fun and amazing in the future. How is that not worth your time?JulieYBM wrote:
If One Piece takes eight volumes to get good that's probably a good sign it isn't really worth the time. Eight volumes is a half of a day's worth of reading to devote to a single comic just to justify reading it "when it gets good."
Like I said, it took a while for me to really get into One Piece, I only got into it after the first 10 volumes, but do you really think I ever considered it a waste of time? It would be a waste of time if things didn't evolve positively or if things got much worse, but that wasn't the case at all. I consider the time I spent getting into One Piece one of the best uses I ever made with my time in regards to entertainment, and now One Piece, like Dragon Ball, is one of my favorite mangas.
That's too bad. If I had done the same as you, since I didn't really get into One Piece before around the 10th volume, I would never have discovered how great One Piece is and I would never have discovered one of my favorite manga.Kid Buu wrote:I disagree, I read about the first three volumes and felt no desire to read the rest. Other series I don't really continue reading unless they "hook" me in.
Of course. But if they do, how can they justly criticize One Piece? First, they didn't read/watch most of it, and second, what they read/watch wasn't even the best parts of it.Saiga wrote:I agree with the sentiment that it's a significant flaw if a series takes multiple volumes to get interesting. And Water 7 starts at volume 34, it is waaay to much to expect someone to wait over 30 volumes before they see something interesting.
So no, for anyone who dropped the series before than, that's being fair. It's up to the work to keep people interested enough to continue reading.
Naruto is kind of like the opposite of One Piece. It starts out great and keeps being great up until the point that Sasuke gets rid of Orochimaru. Then it starts to get worse and worse and eventually goes downhill. Nowadays its a shadow of what it was. And its too bad since I, like many others, was a fan of Naruto (and still am a fan of early Naruto).DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Look at Naruto. It has a better pace and story. The characters are just as great as Dragon Ball is. What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga. Story-wise, it really picks up at Chuuin Exam arc, and things get really interesting from there on. And you only have to read up to Volume 8 to capture your interest, unlike One Piece which can take a while to get your attention. That's a lot of time to invest something that is so ridiculously long. What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
- Blade
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2262
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 2:45 pm
- Location: Contrary to popular belief, not on Kanzenshuu forums.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I think that's a little bit contentious, Naruto's reader-base is nothing to what it was. Naruto was huge when the anime adaptation first started, but it's trailed off in popularity year-on-year ever since. By contrast, One Piece reached the peak of its popularity 2 or 3 years ago, and the most recent One Piece Movie, Film Z, totally smashed a handful of domestic box office records in Japan.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
'Multiculturalism means nothing in Japan, for every outside culture must pass first through the Japanese filter, rendering it entirely Japanese in the process.' - Julian Cope.
- TheAldella
- OMG CRAZY REGEN
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:03 pm
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I'm not so sure. Naruto's actual meat is in Part 1, (Not to say Part 2 doesn't have its moments) whereas One Piece is just better as it moves along. It's a difficult comparison.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Look at Naruto. It has a better pace and story. The characters are just as great as Dragon Ball is. What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga. Story-wise, it really picks up at Chuuin Exam arc, and things get really interesting from there on. And you only have to read up to Volume 8 to capture your interest, unlike One Piece which can take a while to get your attention. That's a lot of time to invest something that is so ridiculously long. What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
Favorite anime -
Mob Psycho 100
Yu Yu Hakusho
Favorite movies -
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
Zack Snyder's Justice League
Mob Psycho 100
Yu Yu Hakusho
Favorite movies -
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
Zack Snyder's Justice League
HybridSaiyan wrote:Super better nail the fusion right. I don't want to see some gay twirling shit like the Zamasu fusion when they should just smack dicks together and merge.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I think the problem here is that a lot of One Piece fans confuse it for being a successor to Dragon Ball in a very surface-level manner. The two series couldn't be any more different. One Piece is about sentimentality, Dragon Ball isn't about anything. It's carefree, but that carefreeness is in no way meant as a message. Dragon Ball is merely the work of a guy who screwed around every week for money. One Piece is one man's crazed attempt to put himself in the record books and the hospital all while saving the children from having to spend more then five dollars on a book. Oda's a true believe, Toriyama does things for other people because he's too passive.
One Piece might involve actual plotting, but it's not the penchant for plotting that I do not want to see Dragon Ball afflicted by, but the other stuff that comes with it. Oda writing Dragon Ball in his own manner would be completely foreign in character to what makes Dragon Ball so great. If Koyama Takao's Hero of Justice Gokuu is a problem just imagine how terrifying Oda's Gokuu would be. Or worse yet, his take on everyone else.
One Piece might involve actual plotting, but it's not the penchant for plotting that I do not want to see Dragon Ball afflicted by, but the other stuff that comes with it. Oda writing Dragon Ball in his own manner would be completely foreign in character to what makes Dragon Ball so great. If Koyama Takao's Hero of Justice Gokuu is a problem just imagine how terrifying Oda's Gokuu would be. Or worse yet, his take on everyone else.
She/Her
The coolest girl you know
The coolest girl you know
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I stopped reading Naruto a long time ago, and recently decided to not go back to it. It occurred to me that if I were to pick it up again, the only chance I would have at making sense of anything would be to:DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:Look at Naruto. It has a better pace and story. The characters are just as great as Dragon Ball is. What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga. Story-wise, it really picks up at Chuuin Exam arc, and things get really interesting from there on. And you only have to read up to Volume 8 to capture your interest, unlike One Piece which can take a while to get your attention. That's a lot of time to invest something that is so ridiculously long. What's even more tiring is that One Piece doesn't seem to end any time soon, while Naruto is reaching its climax. The author of Naruto did a good job of keeping the readers interested and worthwhile.
- Start over from the beginning
- Start over from Part II
Spoiler:
I'm not really interested in Oda's Dragon Ball, but I would give that a peak before Kishimoto's.
(Also, "reaching its climax?" Why does it feel like people have been saying "Naruto's wrapping up and is gonna end in 2-3 years!" for five years?)
Keen Observation of Dragon Ball Z Movie 4's Climax wrote:Slug shits to see the genki
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Kishimoto streamlined the story in the late five hundreds. The last one hundred chapters have literally taken place at two locations with two plotlines that have since merged into one. Kishimoto himself keeps saying he's almost finished but this is the same guy who spent three years promising the JUMP Festa crowds that he would focus on Kakashi. It got to the point where Kishimoto started making fun of himself at JUMP Festa. Of course, Kakashi finally did receive focus early last year. Right now Kishimoto is in "throw in everything including the kitchen sink" mode. The war arc will finish this year, at the very least.
I am pretty impressed that he's managed to keep the series going so long. It's become clear from a lot of his drawings that he's aged a good decade in the last five years alone. Kishimoto doesn't take many breaks, either, despite the volume of work he does on each chapter.
I am pretty impressed that he's managed to keep the series going so long. It's become clear from a lot of his drawings that he's aged a good decade in the last five years alone. Kishimoto doesn't take many breaks, either, despite the volume of work he does on each chapter.
She/Her
The coolest girl you know
The coolest girl you know
- DBZGTKOSDH
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 12401
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
- Location: Greece
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
For Naruto, it started getting good in the Chunin Exams for me, and it's still awesome IMO. But it annoys me when it gets melodramatic, and the anime makes thing far more worse.
And if it doesn't end this year, it will definitely end next year.
And if it doesn't end this year, it will definitely end next year.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Oda did the same thing too. in fact, when we talk about planning on the coming future events in the manga, One Piece easily take the cake form Naruto. Oda planned almost everything in his manga from the start in a brilliant way.DragonBalllKaiHD wrote:What's even better is the author of Naruto really planned way ahead by time he started ink his manga.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
The art in Naruto has changed so much. The quality has dropped significantly and I agree some fights are difficult to nearly impossible to comprehend. Early One Piece has the rounded edges like early Dragon Ball, and slowly changes. By the time we get to Arabasta the change is obvious. Then it slowly gets to it's more refined look we see today. Toriyama's style changed around the late Freeza arc to more jagged edges, like he was trying to draw faster. Even Kubo's art in Bleach has it's "rookie" faze. I actually prefered that early look, but his late character designs are awesome.
What I don't understand is how Kishimoto's style has changed and really regressed.
What I don't understand is how Kishimoto's style has changed and really regressed.
- Gyt Kaliba
- Kicks it Old-School
- Posts: 8861
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:38 am
- Location: Arkansas
- Contact:
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
On the idea of 'One Piece doesn't get good until Volume duh-duh-duh' thing, it's a little off topic but...I just don't see that, in comparison to Toriko, per say. For One Piece, the big stumble for me getting into it was the 4Kids dub, which pretty much soured me on the series as a whole (I know, I was stupid) for the longest time. It wasn't until FUNi got it and put the first of their dubbed episodes on Toonami that I gave it another go, and even then it was just to hear some of my favorite actors in a new show. Once I actually started from the beginning of the anime with their dub, I quickly realized how great I found the story. There was no 'Eh this is okay, but suddenly WOW THIS GOT AMAZING' moment for me.
I'm currently reading and getting caught up on Toriko though, and THAT is where I've had the 'it gets better later' feeling, despite not hearing many people say it about that series. I'm currently about 17 volumes in I think, and it was very subtly that I found myself liking it more. I had to think on it to realize that around volume 12, it had finally grown on me a fair amount. And while I'm still liking it more as I read on now, I can't help but think that it's a little off for a series to only be 'eh, this isn't as bad as I thought I guess' for the first handful of volumes. But then you do get into stuff like Bleach, Naruto, and even One Piece, where as much as I'm liking the series and still loving some characters, take severe dips in quality for various reasons for me later in. And here's the kicker - say what you will about Dragon Ball, but I have no issues at large with it like I do with any of these other series.
And that, I feel, is because of Toriyama's innate genius.
I'm currently reading and getting caught up on Toriko though, and THAT is where I've had the 'it gets better later' feeling, despite not hearing many people say it about that series. I'm currently about 17 volumes in I think, and it was very subtly that I found myself liking it more. I had to think on it to realize that around volume 12, it had finally grown on me a fair amount. And while I'm still liking it more as I read on now, I can't help but think that it's a little off for a series to only be 'eh, this isn't as bad as I thought I guess' for the first handful of volumes. But then you do get into stuff like Bleach, Naruto, and even One Piece, where as much as I'm liking the series and still loving some characters, take severe dips in quality for various reasons for me later in. And here's the kicker - say what you will about Dragon Ball, but I have no issues at large with it like I do with any of these other series.
And that, I feel, is because of Toriyama's innate genius.
AniManga Travelogue - Currently Reviewing: Dragon Ball (Z)
Twitter
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)
Switch Friend Code: SW-0745-6427-7791 (let's play some Dragon Ball: The Breakers!)
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
I absolutely agree. The reasons why I like Dragon Ball are different from the reasons why I like One Piece.JulieYBM wrote:I think the problem here is that a lot of One Piece fans confuse it for being a successor to Dragon Ball in a very surface-level manner. The two series couldn't be any more different.
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
The plots and characters would be a lot stronger and all the characters would still play a vital part. It'd have even more perverted humour, haha.
I just started watching One Piece with my sister last year and I thought it started getting great around Arlong Park. I tried the manga but the artwork turned me off and Oda stuffing the panels full of too much. So manga wise I prefer Toriyama for sure.
I just started watching One Piece with my sister last year and I thought it started getting great around Arlong Park. I tried the manga but the artwork turned me off and Oda stuffing the panels full of too much. So manga wise I prefer Toriyama for sure.
It is in his character to be rude and a bit crass. He's a hick, with no formal education. That is Son Goku. That is who he is.
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
Superman in an orange Gi was the bastard son of FUNimation. Its not The real character, it is as false as Chatku.
-DemonRin
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
Tim Duncan is dope and forever.
My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ
My favorite anime and manga (characters included): https://myanimelist.net/profile/SaiyanZ?q=SaiyanZ
Re: What If Eiichiro Oda wrote Dragon Ball?
Yamato is straight up dead, apparently, according to a recent interview. So not forgotten, his "death" was just given absolutely no focus. Kind of sad, I liked him.SaiyanZ wrote:The only thing saving Naruto atm is Madara Uchiha. Naruto and Sasuke have taken nosedives as characters in Part II, the Konoha 11 is pretty much useless, Tsunade sucks as a Hokage, Yamato is forgotten, Obito is one of the worst villains ever......yeah Naruto isn't as good as One Piece imo even though I like them equally, though Part I is really good. Ever since the declaration of the 4th World War, Naruto just hasn't be as good. Plot isn't near One Piece's right now, but pace is most certainly better.
I'm re-watching Dragon Ball GT in full on my blog. Check it out if you're interested in my thoughts on the series as I watch through it!