super michael wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:09 pm
Are you sure it took Master Roshi 3 years to climb Korin Tower? Korin says that it took Master Roshi 3 years to get the water, while it took Goku 3 days to get the water which is tap water.
Oh, I think I screwed up. You're probably right about that, I think it was the water. Guess I need to rewatch DB recut again.
super michael wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:09 pm
You know your right, I have been so focused so much on explanation, what type of training they did, what power gain they make, if it makes sense what they did, etc, that I am now seeing those things don't matter. Those are the wrong things to focus on.
What I should focus on is the fight scenes, the enjoyable gags, characters fighting and adventures. Basically the positive things.
Well, I want to be clear, I'm not saying you can't examine these things here. Don't only look at the positive side! My only real intent was to highlight that all of Dragon Ball has some issues with the power scale, and when we talk about the problems with Super, it's probably about more than just power scaling.
super michael wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:09 pm
Edit I just want to say sorry for taking my discussion too seriously about DBS and complaining about DBS a lot, I would PM members in privates but I see some member doesn't have the PM option. I promise I won't be complaining from now on.
I will stop complaining about Goten and Trunks, since I did go overboard.
Sorry if my post has caused any trouble. I will change my way how I debate for the better.
Hey, you're good, bro. You saw how the other guy was acting. We disagreed, but I don't want there to be any animosity between us. I'm sorry if I got my wires crossed and accidentally took too harsh a tone because at the same time I was arguing with the other guy who definitely did not want to hear
anyone else's take.
Skar wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:36 pm
Oh ok. It just sounded like a definitive claim that most people will be nostalgic towards the sequels after the next trilogy begins. I guess some people might but I was never nostalgic towards something I watched years ago if I didn't like it much in the first place. I guess it also depends on their age. I was around 10 when I watched Phantom Menace and that was actually the first SW movie I had ever seen. I watched the rest of the prequels and original trilogy in high school. Although I don't really have high expectations for sequels of completed stories, I still give them a chance and try to judge them based on their own merits and circumstances.
I wasn't trying to make any specific accusations, just to say that it does happen to some people, and basically always will happen to
some people. I mean, I'm not innocent. I brought up Sonic Lost World because that was a polarizing game that upset a lot of people, and I
liked it, and personally can't wait for the nostalgia cycle to make that the game everyone wants to go back to.
Skar wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:36 pm
Well the topic of this thread is power scaling so that's what most people who joined the thread wanted to discuss. To be honest, I've been on the forum since 2013 and DBS has been the only DB media that questioning any power-up gets you accused of it being all you cared about in the series. Fans on here questioned power-ups in the original series, GT, or fanwork for years and suggest that some could've been handled better. It's usually when an explanation feels a little off and didn't benefit other characters who underwent the same training in similar circumstances. It's not all they care about and just something that wouldn't hurt if there was an alternative or more unique option.
Well, that's my point, it's not really about the mere questioning of a power difference, but treating it like it's
new. I won't lie, you see a lot of that response because I think people like myself made peace with things not always making sense in the older shows, so seeing Super brought up with these problems like they're unique or somehow particularly egregious, especially when a lot of the changes are deliberate to give more characters a fighting chance, it provokes that knee-jerk reaction.
Skar wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:36 pm
For example, there's criticism of the DBS manga based on execution, pacing, etc but I don't think I've ever heard someone say a certain character being weaker or not getting as big of a power-up as depicted in the anime was one of them. If the power-up has little effect on the narrative or any other criteria that people judge a story by then nothing wrong with suggesting it could've been handled differently.
Well, I for one have seen complaints like that. I have definitely seen complaints that Trunks is kind of undermined and not given as much to do in the manga because of how much weaker he is. I think this might just be a spot where we'll have to agree to disagree though, since there's not a great way to track that.
Skar wrote: Fri May 21, 2021 6:36 pm
Since Roshi's role would be the same if he was still implied to be weaker than his students, I don't think anyone would've argued him secretly surpassing some of them would've been better for what was established in DB. If Freeza obtained a god transformation for his race or something else that related to BoG, I doubt anyone would say the idea they read somewhere of beating up a much weaker sparing partner for a few months would've been just as good of an explanation.
Well that's why I'm not really arguing that the explanations make the story better, but that they don't particularly matter in the manner being complained about. Power scale debates usually focus on the purely "logistical", how doing x thing gives you x amount of strength. Kind of like how all those guys tried to prove it was biologically or mathematically impossible for that woman in The Last of Us 2 to be buff or whatever?
I think it's totally valid to complain about opportunities for thematic relevance and character building
within power boosts not being taken, but I view that as distinct from specifically complaining about the character's numbers or tier-levels shifting somehow in and of themselves, which is what it always feels like I'm seeing in power scale debates. If it were more about whether the character is being
used well, I'd be a lot more forgiving.