Gine Appreciation Thread.

[WittyUsername]

Actually, I was saying that she apparently lied to Raditz

Which is actually exactly what I said.

When you said GINE APPARENTLY LIED TO RADITZ and then proceeded to argue against me rationalizing the possibility.

You had said that (what literally happened) which is Gine sending Goku for safety, raises the question of why she apparenly lied to Raditz.

I responded to that.

The only thing that's confusing is you saying you "don't know what I'm talking about".

This is the last time I’m going to respond, but you accused me of “disagreeing with my own suggestion” that Gine lied to Raditz, when I did no such thing. You’re accusing me of contradicting myself, when all I said was that Gine neglected to tell Raditz the reason they sent his brother to Earth.

I’m sorry, but it comes across like you're arguing just for the sake of it. I don’t understand what exactly was so confusing or incoherent about what I said.

[Peril]

Is anyone watching Masako's video series about if Gine trained and didn't go to the kitchen? I think its pretty interesting.

[dva_raza]

I’m sorry, but it comes across like you're arguing just for the sake of it.

You're .. shitting me right? I genuinely don’t know the point of this reply of yours. I responded to your on topic question 3 posts ago.

You're the one dragging out some “confusion” conflict when there was none from my end.

you accused me of “disagreeing with my own suggestion” that Gine lied to Raditz, when I did no such thing.

You did. For, hopefully, a last time, the contradiction is: you established that she lied (since your question wasn’t whether she lied or not, BUT WHY SHE DID), and then you essentially said “but it couldn’t be cause she didn’t prevent Raditz”.

That is you: arguing against your own suggestion.

Which is what I said you did. You made a suggestion, and you argued against it.




And just to return to your topic point, since you buried what I said with all the other shit,

The question about why she didn’t prevent Raditz is basically the same question as "why didn’t she run away herself".

Gine suggests them all run away together. Bardock brushes it off, cause scouters.
That’s an answer to why she didn’t tell Raditz. Cause a “bad feeling” is just that, and a sense of urgency or seriousness clearly didn't hit.
They simply took a precaution with the baby and probably didn’t expect to actually be dead within the next few hours.
If they had they wouldn't be avoiding at least trying to save their own lives just because they might be found, that would be dumb and no way it would've happened

[jjgp1112]

Dude, he's not saying that doesn't think Gine lied, he's saying he doesn't understand why she would lie. He's essentially saying that the character's actions don't make sense, not that they didn't actually happen.

That's why I said you need to read people's posts more clearly. Nearly every argument you've gotten in on here is from you and the other poster seemingly having two different conversations. You've been arguing this so bullheadedly that I started getting confused and reading his posts wrong too.

[dva_raza]

Dude, he's not saying that doesn't think Gine lied, he's saying he doesn't understand why she would lie. He's essentially saying that the character's actions don't make sense, not that they didn't actually happen.

That's why I said you need to read people's posts more clearly. Nearly every argument you've gotten in on here is from you and the other poster seemingly having two different conversations. You've been arguing this so bullheadedly that I started getting confused and reading his posts wrong too.

Drop the gaslighting crap. This is why I asked you to point specifically the part I apparently misinterpreted.

You’re not telling me anything, you just repeated the same clarification this guy has already made himself, which I never said I didn’t understand, I just don’t agree with it.

So I don't know what's your point with this is other than serving as continuation of getting on my case over me allegedly not responding to what’s being said. Like your last post on Masenko’s thread was incomprehensible (if that’s what you’re referring to).
By your tone I just had to accept I was wrong about something, but I still have no idea what.
Anyway.



I don’t know what is the “different argument” you say I’m having.

What I understand is,
- WittyUsername said (essentially); Gine sent Goku off to save him. But Raditz believed Goku was sent off for a different reason. Hence Gine apparently lied.
- I replied why I thought Gine apparently lied to Raditz.
- He responds “if that was the case she might’ve as well not said anything”.
(I’m sorry you disagree but that’s fundamentally a rejection to the notion that she did lie. Questioning motives of something that’s already just an assumption (that she lied), is the same as disputing that assumption.)
- I responded why I think “not saying anything” wouldn’t work. After this he began implying there’s some confusion about something.

So, again, I just fail to see the discrepancy you believe there was in what I’m responding and what he meant. Or why you are hung up on the “contradiction” thing.