But that is maybe a great example. "Koopa-Peach" (which she would be called anyway in Japan as "Bowser" is not the Japanese name of the villain) was the actual first "Bowsette" and existed even before the meme (obviously, as a whole artbook needs much time to be done) and now the super sexy other Bowsette was made by some fan. Obviously fans will not get this Bowsette but since so many still at least want "a" Bowsette, Nintendo can consider this an unexpected test run and bring in "a" Bowsette (maybe in form of the one that they formerly made). Obviously she is not as lewd as she does not look like a domina but its not like that matters for most people as she still has a Peach-face and many people already associate the character overall without so much awesomeness that they want her in the games (even if it means the sexiness on an official side is toned town). I did not follow your entire conversation because it seems to be going for a while already but really this character i a prime example of why it is smart for companies' to bring in stuff like e.g. in DB Broly and Cooler and Gogeta. Fans associate a lot with them and these things are popular so its easy money.Chuquita wrote: I could say a film deserves an award, but ultimately it's all subjective. I'd say it's like how people want Bowsette in Smash Bros because she's a popular non-canon character (well, there's that scrapped similar character from Odyssey, but that went unused).
Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie #1 Thread: "Broly"
Moderators: Kanzenshuu Staff, General Help
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
"Citation needed."
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
"too lazy
feel free to take it with grain of salt or discredit me altogether, I'm not losing any sleep"
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Guys,many are not so sure the new character is Gogeta. The silhouette is bald. They are suspecting that it is now Cooler? 

- Vados_chan
- Banned
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:50 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Gogeta is in but please keep up your pathetic trolling with that stupid emote, it's going to be all the funnier for it come November 14thMiracles wrote:Guys,many are not so sure the new character is Gogeta. The silhouette is bald. They are suspecting that it is now Cooler?
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I'm jut telling you what others are saying now about Cooler.Vados_chan wrote:Gogeta is in but please keep up your pathetic trolling with that stupid emote, it's going to be all the funnier for it come November 14thMiracles wrote:Guys,many are not so sure the new character is Gogeta. The silhouette is bald. They are suspecting that it is now Cooler?
Turn the thermostat down.

Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
The silhouette doesn't actually look like the character. That would make it way too easy to predict who it isMiracles wrote:Guys,many are not so sure the new character is Gogeta. The silhouette is bald. They are suspecting that it is now Cooler?
Spoiler:
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I know. I was just saying what the new rumor mill is now.PFM18 wrote:The silhouette doesn't actually look like the character. That would make it way too easy to predict who it isMiracles wrote:Guys,many are not so sure the new character is Gogeta. The silhouette is bald. They are suspecting that it is now Cooler?
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
So based on what they said about the movie having 1,800 cuts then if the avergae time between cuts was the same as it was for One Piece Film Gold then it would mean this Broly movie would be 108 minutes.
That'd be alright it sounds like it could be about as long as the extended versions of Battle of Gods and Resurrection F.
Not sure why we can't get a 120 minute movie though.
That'd be alright it sounds like it could be about as long as the extended versions of Battle of Gods and Resurrection F.
Not sure why we can't get a 120 minute movie though.
- AnimeNation101
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:01 pm
- Location: Planet ShoJump
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Well, the 1800 cuts would probably be excluding the cgi scenes so i’d say 110 to 113 minutesBullza wrote:So based on what they said about the movie having 1,800 cuts then if the avergae time between cuts was the same as it was for One Piece Film Gold then it would mean this Broly movie would be 108 minutes.
That'd be alright it sounds like it could be about as long as the extended versions of Battle of Gods and Resurrection F.
Not sure why we can't get a 120 minute movie though.
I called it that Gogeta, Bardock, and something Broly related would be in the movie before it was even announced that it was a Broly movie.
"I don't think I'm a hero of justice or anythin'. But those who'd hurt my friends... I won't forgive!"

"I don't think I'm a hero of justice or anythin'. But those who'd hurt my friends... I won't forgive!"
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Please, you ask for me numbers but yet you made one for yourself? How funny. I could even add Twitter, but I guess you're too biased with Minus to realize that. (As you think the only reason for people dislike it is because they prefer the TV Special)alakazam^ wrote:I don't need to pay more attention to all those places to know they aren't 51% of the fanbase. So no, you don't have the numbers that prove your claim.
Yeah, that's the problem with most platform Mario games, I enjoy a lot through the first run, but then there's no much to do after.Chuquita wrote:If I have anything negative to say about it...there's not much replayability after you beat the game outside of the collectithon stuff. I'm not the type to 100% games that often unless there's an unlockable I really want.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
108 is a lot better than the 90-95 I thought we'd get. Hopefully they take advantage of it and not waste it on pointless gags like what BOG did.Bullza wrote:So based on what they said about the movie having 1,800 cuts then if the avergae time between cuts was the same as it was for One Piece Film Gold then it would mean this Broly movie would be 108 minutes.
That'd be alright it sounds like it could be about as long as the extended versions of Battle of Gods and Resurrection F.
Not sure why we can't get a 120 minute movie though.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I wanted it to be as long as possible but I'll take 108. I also thought 90-95 was what we were gonna get and I'm pleasantly surprised.sintzu wrote:108 is a lot better than the 90-95 I thought we'd get. Hopefully they take advantage of it and not waste it on pointless gags like what BOG did.Bullza wrote:So based on what they said about the movie having 1,800 cuts then if the avergae time between cuts was the same as it was for One Piece Film Gold then it would mean this Broly movie would be 108 minutes.
That'd be alright it sounds like it could be about as long as the extended versions of Battle of Gods and Resurrection F.
Not sure why we can't get a 120 minute movie though.
Spoiler:
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I don't think they will, the "filler" was the worst part of Battle of Gods and they fixed that mistake for Resurrection F so I can't see them going backwards now.sintzu wrote:108 is a lot better than the 90-95 I thought we'd get. Hopefully they take advantage of it and not waste it on pointless gags like what BOG did.
Though it is concerning that they've shoved Goten and Trunks in there because they aren't capable of anything but pointless gags these days.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
You must be the biased one if you think the majority of the fanbase even knows that Minus is a thing. Not everyone is knowledgeable or discusses about Dragon Ball like we do. Don't fall for the vocal minority trick.Noah wrote:Please, you ask for me numbers but yet you made one for yourself? How funny. I could even add Twitter, but I guess you're too biased with Minus to realize that. (As you think the only reason for people dislike it is because they prefer the TV Special)
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Gogeta's silhouette looks a lot like a tailless Cooler alright, but the shoulders also kinda look like the padding of a Metamorese vest, now doesn't it?
- miguelnuva1
- I Live Here
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I can't believe in 2018 there are still people that think Silhouettes are the actually character.
- Low Tone G
- I'm, pretty, cozy, here...
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:34 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Yeah, Kefla's silhouette was really misleading back then too... She had no hair shown to begin with.miguelnuva1 wrote:I can't believe in 2018 there are still people that think Silhouttes are the actually character.
English is not my first language!
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...
I'm still waiting for Dragon Ball in Super...
- Polyphase Avatron
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 6643
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:48 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Is there a reason why why would fuse into Gogeta instead of Vegeto? Lack of access to the potara?
Cool stuff that I upload here because Youtube will copyright claim it: https://vimeo.com/user60967147
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Yeah, I assume the Kais won't be around during the fight so the dance will be the only way. Out of universe is because we already got Vegetto so it's Gogeta's turn.Polyphase Avatron wrote:Is there a reason why would fuse into Gogeta instead of Vegeto? Lack of access to the potara?
I think she had the same silhouette this character has, whoever (Gogeta) it is.Low Tone G wrote:Yeah, Kefla's silhouette was really misleading back then too... She had no hair shown to begin with.miguelnuva1 wrote:I can't believe in 2018 there are still people that think Silhouttes are the actually character.
July 9th 2018 will be remembered as the day Broly became canon.
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Nah, Kefla's silhouette had hands on hips, was much more slender, and was a 3/4 view. Kinda funny since Kefla ended up being quite thick.sintzu wrote: I think she had the same silhouette this character has, whoever (Gogeta) it is.

- GodVegetto91
- Banned
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 12:49 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
There is no reason. Just blind and stupid fanservice.Polyphase Avatron wrote:Is there a reason why why would fuse into Gogeta instead of Vegeto? Lack of access to the potara?