Wouldn't surprise me that Budokai HD and For Kinect have sold so little, but 9000k copies only seems quite off from being a realistic amount. I might just as well grab a copy of Budokai HD in case the game stupidly increases to a high price but this is normally just happens with NES games mostly.TheMightyOzaru wrote:Less than 9,000 probably.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDbb6OOSh7oTheDevilsCorpse wrote:To be fair, when are the Muso games ever all that exciting? They are usually just fighting against wave after wave of the exact same enemies over an over again, with a couple different bosses/generals thrown in for a bit of variety. It's true that Dragon Ball doesn't seem to fit with that gameplay style very well, but it could still be done. The examples listed above are just the ones from the series seemed appropriate for each arc, but it's not like they couldn't get creative with the enemies if they chose to; either by expanding on the classes already listed (kind like DBO and their dozens of Saibaimen designs) or by creating entirely new ones.SparkyPantsMcGee wrote:Not trying to be a dick or anything, but that doesn't really sound like an exciting enemy list. A lot of enemy seem to take cues from Sagas and I can't even describe how bored I got trudging through seas of Saibaimen and prototype androids.
Aliens failed because the guys contracted to make the game (Gearbox I think) outsource the game development to TimeGate studios. Time Gate basically abandoned whatever Gearbox had made save for a few assets and did their own thing with Gearbox not at least watching the development of game and making sure that reach development goals. By the time gearbox actually checked what was being done, it was too late and thus the infamous misleading pr campaign started. Not to mention that GearBox was taking money given to make Aliens to go boost up the Border Lands 2 budget as well as diverting staff from Aliens to Border Lands 2.dbboxkaifan wrote:That's sometimes true but let's not forget Duke Nukem Forever, Aliens: Colonial Marines, Star Command, Gran Turismo 5 and others, these all were in development for a long time and they never achieved to be in its true state as described.Thanos wrote:Well, the longer it takes, the more time they have to develop it, weed out bugs, etc... so I'm not getting impatient any time soon.
However, as this is Dragon Ball it's bound to expect a broken low quality game because it's what we normally get with Namco Bandai.
Because there's nothing to talk about right now.hulkty wrote:Seems like this thread isn't even talking about the new game anymore...
How do we know they are using Spike?dbboxkaifan wrote:So they'd go two years without releasing a new Dragon Ball game? That'd be great if the developer they were using wasn't Spike, and Spike's best effort were Tenkaichi 3 / Raging Blast 2 and Ultimate Blast. Whether they take too little or too long the game's going to be more or less the same, Spike just isn't a developer either Microsoft, Nintendo nor Sony would want to have for their first party games.
We don't.sangofe wrote:How do we know they are using Spike?dbboxkaifan wrote:So they'd go two years without releasing a new Dragon Ball game? That'd be great if the developer they were using wasn't Spike, and Spike's best effort were Tenkaichi 3 / Raging Blast 2 and Ultimate Blast. Whether they take too little or too long the game's going to be more or less the same, Spike just isn't a developer either Microsoft, Nintendo nor Sony would want to have for their first party games.
Yeha you're right but during the early years Bandai used to have Dimps developing Dragon Ball Z games also whereas now it's solely Spike.Hellspawn28 wrote:Bandai has been using Spike since 2005. 2008 was the only year that we didn't get a game from Spike.
