
The reason why the alien is warning Bardock actually makes a lot of sense. But he's going to kill him anyway.

I'm torn. On one hand, it falls into that trend where people try to downplay the Saiyans' responsibility. Regardless of their being essentially human, capable of all the good and bad associated with that, their culture and its values are decidedly bad-natured (not too different from some ancient human cultures). Even the Saiyans themselves seem to grapple with this, what with Raditz freaking out over how bad a father Bardock was and, within DB canon, Vegeta's own gradual shift. So the whole "you aren't really responsible" thing rubs me wrong. It's like saying the hitman isn't as responsible as the boss who ordered the murder. That might be true on some level...but not in an especially meaningful way. And if the Saiyans aren't going to be held responsible for their actions then that reduces the impact of the implicit understanding, if not outright guilt, survivors like Vegeta (and apparently Bardock) come to.Scarz wrote:The reason why the alien is warning Bardock actually makes a lot of sense. But he's going to kill him anyway.
I assumed so as well but I don't know what the original version of the special says about that. Toma just mentions a rumor about why Freeza wanted them annihilated. It's possible really only a special caste or minority have those powers of precognition. Since we practically nothing about the Kanassans before they are destroyed, it leaves some wiggle room for fan fiction. I wonder if Akira Toriyama or Katsuyoshi Nakatsuru had anything to say about them in their notes for the actual TV special?batistabus wrote:I thought all Kanassans had psychic abilities...so why wouldn't they believe him?
Yeah but then again...Bardock did try to pull a fast one on Freeza...and we all know how that turned outTonyTheTiger wrote:If Bardock kills him then that would make Bardock an idiot on so many levels. In the TV special it makes sense on the grounds that he was attacked and didn't exactly believe or understand what he was being told. But here, if Bardock correctly processes what this guy is actually saying then killing somebody who is clearly good at this whole telling the future stuff is not just being a belligerent Saiyan. It's being a moron.
But Saiyans are bastards though. Bardock may not believe that he has a reason to leave this non-fighter Kanassan on a planet that's destined to be sold off anyway. I don't see Bardock sparing him "out of the good of his heart", because he'll probably either think that the Kanassan's bullshitting for whatever reason, or that he has enough information about his race's fate and now the Kanassan's worthless.TonyTheTiger wrote:If this guy gives Bardock the precognition powers then maybe he'd kill him based on the good ol' "you've outlived your usefulness." But I dunno. The Kanassan seems much more friendly here than in the TV special. At least he seems more willing to help. And when you're going after the big bad who has a reputation for being OMGInvincible, you kinda look for whatever help you can. Vegeta learned this on Namek.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Salagir's comment:batistabus wrote:I thought all Kanassans had psychic abilities...so why wouldn't they believe him?
Realistically Bardock has no reason to believe him and the alien doesn't exactly have much proof of what he is saying. Knowing Freeza's and Vegeta's names is hardly definite proof of what he is saying.TonyTheTiger wrote:Vegeta was the biggest bastard of all the Saiyans and even he was smart enough to realize that Krillin and Gohan could help him against Freeza. Hell, he even found the non-combatant Dende a useful, if reluctant ally for obvious reasons. So I don't see how Bardock being a bastard would affect his sense of self-preservation when faced with the prospect of going up against that same exact opponent. An ally who can see the future and has experience interpreting the visions isn't something to blast away just because you're not a very nice person.
But if you take it away because of such a reason, you lose an important moment for his character.rereboy wrote:Really? You actually think that Salagir missed that? That he is talking about that?
Salagir is talking about being useful to him to change his own future. Basically, he feels that it was a shame that Bardock had the ability to see the future and he wasn't able to use it whatsoever to change any event.
The Kanassan raised his power to get their attention. It's not like Bardock just happened across him. He realizes that there's nothing they could do to stop them, but the Saiyans aren't ultimately responsible. Freeza is. He's trying to set in motion a plan to eliminate the source of all this before he dies, because he knows he's going to die anyway.batistabus wrote:I'd accept the fact that only certain Kanassans can see the future, but not just one, who SO HAPPENS to be the one that Bardock comes across. That's almost as stupid as what's trying to be eliminated in the first place.
That, or the Kanassan's can't control what they see (like Bardock), or realize there's nothing they can do to change their fates.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.
Like I said, Bardock may not believe that he has a reason to leave this non-fighter Kanassan on a planet that's destined to be sold off anyway, and for all he knows, the Kanassan could be bullshitting him for whatever reason.TonyTheTiger wrote:Vegeta was the biggest bastard of all the Saiyans and even he was smart enough to realize that Krillin and Gohan could help him against Freeza. Hell, he even found the non-combatant Dende a useful, if reluctant ally for obvious reasons. So I don't see how Bardock being a bastard would affect his sense of self-preservation when faced with the prospect of going up against that same exact opponent. An ally who can see the future and has experience interpreting the visions isn't something to blast away just because you're not a very nice person.
Holden Caulfield in [b][i]The Catcher in the Rye[/i][/b] wrote:I hope to hell when I do die somebody has sense enough to just dump me in the river or something. Anything except sticking me in a goddam cemetery. People coming and putting a bunch of flowers on your stomach on Sunday, and all that crap. Who wants flowers when you're dead? Nobody.
Kami wasn't a fighter either, but was much stronger than other fighters from Earth. But he used his ki/strength for creating the Dragonballs ect.DBZGTKOSDH wrote:How can it be that the Kanassan is not a fighter(according to him) but having higher battle power than Toma?
Yeah, but Kami has fought in the 23rd Tenkaichi Budokai and also fought Garlick Jr., and maybe Garlick during the old times. He wasn't fighting much, because he couldn't leave he Heavenly Realm whenever he wanted to.Godo wrote:Kami wasn't a fighter either, but was much stronger than other fighters from Earth. But he used his ki/strength for creating the Dragonballs ect.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.
Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.