The BD correction? Seems like he went back and tidied up the face. I prefer it, personally. Looks great in motion.JulieYBM wrote: Wow, what did they do to Tate's Kamehame-Ha? That was perfectly fine.
"Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.
Deadtuber.
Deadtuber.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
It looks to me like an chief animation supervisor changed it. It's a lot more on-model than Tate's work usually is.Ajay wrote:The BD correction? Seems like he went back and tidied up the face. I prefer it, personally. Looks great in motion.JulieYBM wrote: Wow, what did they do to Tate's Kamehame-Ha? That was perfectly fine.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Can you post a pic so that the rest of us can compare please?JulieYBM wrote:It looks to me like an chief animation supervisor changed it. It's a lot more on-model than Tate's work usually is.Ajay wrote:The BD correction? Seems like he went back and tidied up the face. I prefer it, personally. Looks great in motion.JulieYBM wrote: Wow, what did they do to Tate's Kamehame-Ha? That was perfectly fine.
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
One of the weirdest changes for the home video release that I saw was this shot of Beerus:
I don't quite see what was wrong with him before (original is on the left).
As for the Tate cut comparisons kinisking, here are a few (again with the original on the left).
Also, Ajay uploaded a comparison video to YouTube which is pretty handy (thanks Ajay)!
Spoiler:
As for the Tate cut comparisons kinisking, here are a few (again with the original on the left).
Spoiler:
Last edited by Wezenheim on Thu Apr 07, 2016 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/YTWes
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Yeah, this was weird one. My guess is that they wanted Beeurs look more cat-ish, so to speak.Wezenheim wrote:One of the weirdest changes for the home video release that I saw was this shot of Beerus:
I don't quite see what was wrong with him before (original is on the left).!Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Beerus was changed to better reflect where Goku is stood in the wide shot that precedes it. Rather than redraw Beerus at 3/4 angle, they simply moved his head, which looks quite odd as a result.
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.
Deadtuber.
Deadtuber.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Ah, gotcha. I really do wonder if box 3 is going to have any edited episodes. I can see why they didn't fix anything in box 2 (and I'd actually prefer they don't waste their time fixing those) but I wonder if the month delay for box 3 indicates that they intend to touch up some episodes. It wouldn't make a huge difference but it might be cool regardless.Ajay wrote:Beerus was changed to better reflect where Goku is stood in the wide shot that precedes it. Rather than redraw Beerus at 3/4 angle, they simply moved his head, which looks quite odd as a result.
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/YTWes
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Thanks man. Yeah, I might actually like the old one better. In the old one he seems straight up surprised, and annoyed at what's happening. The newer one is better drawn but seems to have less emotion.Wezenheim wrote:One of the weirdest changes for the home video release that I saw was this shot of Beerus:
I don't quite see what was wrong with him before (original is on the left).Spoiler:
As for the Tate cut comparisons kinisking, here are a few (again with the original on the left).
Also, Ajay uploaded a comparison video to YouTube which is pretty handy (thanks Ajay)!Spoiler:
Disclaimer: I might get into a disagreement with you. Sometimes I might even get feisty about it. I'll never harbor negative feelings because of it though. I hope you feel the same way!Jinzoningen MULE wrote: Maybe I should start making it a point not to comment when I'm not sure of something. Too many people know what they're talking about around here.
I made a bet with Alee9977 that Vegeta won't be beaten quickly by an opponent. If I lose, I switch my avatar to Vegeta getting beat by hit. If I win, he switches it to Vegeta holding Black by his hair. This will last a month.
- ArchedThunder
- Born 'n Bred Here
- Posts: 5718
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:03 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
I asked this a little while back with no answer, but what are the chances that Toei has decided to ride out these last 3 months of the first year of Super with the current production schedule and treat year 2 as a different show and start work on it a head of time so that it will have a regular production schedule?
If possible and if that is the case I wonder if we'd get 10 episodes of filler, I mean I'd assume that if year 2 was treated as a different show they'd have to start a new arc with it.
If possible and if that is the case I wonder if we'd get 10 episodes of filler, I mean I'd assume that if year 2 was treated as a different show they'd have to start a new arc with it.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Chances are slim to none. Something spectacular has to happen for Super to get into regular schedule at this point. I am not saying that it cannot happen but it requires drastic measures from the production team.ArchedThunder wrote:I asked this a little while back with no answer, but what are the chances that Toei has decided to ride out these last 3 months of the first year of Super with the current production schedule and treat year 2 as a different show and start work on it a head of time so that it will have a regular production schedule?
If possible and if that is the case I wonder if we'd get 10 episodes of filler, I mean I'd assume that if year 2 was treated as a different show they'd have to start a new arc with it.
-
TheShadowEmperor8055
- Regular
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:36 pm
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
That would be awesome, but I doubt it. I find it difficult for Toei to all of a sudden flip the switch after messing up Dragon Ball for so long in some areas (some, though not all)... I think it was even said in an interview that there is very little time to do things....ArchedThunder wrote:I asked this a little while back with no answer, but what are the chances that Toei has decided to ride out these last 3 months of the first year of Super with the current production schedule and treat year 2 as a different show and start work on it a head of time so that it will have a regular production schedule?
If possible and if that is the case I wonder if we'd get 10 episodes of filler, I mean I'd assume that if year 2 was treated as a different show they'd have to start a new arc with it.
From the interview itself:
Do you think the Japanese industry is producing anime beyond its means?
Hayashida: Yes, this is a real dilemma. There are a lot of newbies coming up through the industry right now, and production time is limited. That's the reason why anime quality has deteriorated slightly. For example, in the United States, there is much more control over the delivery time allowed for an animated production, but things don't work the same way for Japan.
In Japan, the time for post-production has been reduced more and more to an unsustainable level. The director barely has time to check the final product. There is no time for review after all the work of the animation process, and as a result, the quality suffers.
Is there any solution for this?
Hayashida: This has been happening since the introduction of digital technology to anime production. Because anime studios use up all their time in digital production, they trust that the director can take less time to do revisions.
It's the same situation for every anime studio: pre-production takes the same amount of time as always, production time has greatly increased and post-production time has greatly decreased. If we do not improve the work system, it will be difficult to improve the quality.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Wait, what?? That's 36 dollars a cut! That's sounds like almost slavery... not to mention less than 3 dollars a drawing. WTF.JulieYBM wrote:
In the Japanese animation industry the English word 'cut' (written in katakana as 'katto') refers to a shot. Every time the camera 'cuts' away to a different character or object is a 'cut'. For example, this scene from the Yuu Yuu Hakusho movie uses three cuts. This masterful fight scene from Episode #73 uses fifteen cuts. Rookie key animators are paid 4,000¥ a cut and the average key animator can usually finish two cuts a day, most cuts requiring multiple key animation frames to give the movement solid structure.
In-between animators can usually do up to fifteen drawings a day and are paid about 200-300¥ a drawing.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to notice that you guys here actually liked the infamous/legendary Episode 5. Can someone explain to me what are the reasons behind this trend? I'm not judging... just curious.Ajay wrote: So going by that, this is what Otsuka Ken did on episode 5 - https://a.pomf.cat/fuuvff.webm
Essentially, he did the best looking part of the entire episode next to the cool Tate 'pop' Kamehameha later on.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
It was pretty much entirely redone for blu-ray.PMD wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to notice that you guys here actually liked the infamous/legendary Episode 5. Can someone explain to me what are the reasons behind this trend? I'm not judging... just curious.
The finished episode 5 is hard not to like, animation-wise.
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
I know that. I have the blu-ray version. I just don't like some drawings in the episode, especially the wide shots. The majority of them are pretty lame, and movement too, no matter how much blurry draws they added to it in the correction.Araki wrote:It was pretty much entirely redone for blu-ray.PMD wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to notice that you guys here actually liked the infamous/legendary Episode 5. Can someone explain to me what are the reasons behind this trend? I'm not judging... just curious.
The finished episode 5 is hard not to like, animation-wise.
(It's ok if I'm asking this in this threat? I'm kind of new in the forum, so sorry if I'm screwing it)
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
I don't like how episode 5 looks, and I don't think Ajay and Jacob do either (although I'd hate to speak for them), we are just saying that Ken Ootsuka was responsible for one of the two/three cuts that were actually worth a darn in that whole episode animation wise, which was the scene Ajay referenced above. It isn't perfect or even spectacular, but considering the absolutely horrendously short amount of time pretty much everyone involved with that episode had, it was pretty good. Ken is a talented guy and I'm excited to see his work in episode 39, hopefully now with at least a little more time.PMD wrote:I know that. I have the blu-ray version. I just don't like some drawings in the episode, especially the wide shots. The majority of them are pretty lame, and movement too, no matter how much blurry draws they added to it in the correction.Araki wrote:It was pretty much entirely redone for blu-ray.PMD wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to notice that you guys here actually liked the infamous/legendary Episode 5. Can someone explain to me what are the reasons behind this trend? I'm not judging... just curious.
The finished episode 5 is hard not to like, animation-wise.
(It's ok if I'm asking this in this threat? I'm kind of new in the forum, so sorry if I'm screwing it)
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/YTWes
- Psykomatik
- Regular
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:37 am
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Episode 40:
. Scenario: King Ryu
. Director/Storyboard: Masanori Sato
. Animation Supervisor : Yoshitaka Yashima
Episode 41:
. Scenario: King Ryu
. Storyboard: Hiroyuki Kakudo
. Director: Hideki Hiroshima
. Animation Supervisor: Seizo Toma
Episode 42:
. Scenario: Yoshitaka Toshio
. Storyboard: Yoshitaka Yashima
. Director: Can't read it correctly, i'm sorry
. Animation Supervisor: Osamu Ishikawa
. Scenario: King Ryu
. Director/Storyboard: Masanori Sato
. Animation Supervisor : Yoshitaka Yashima
Episode 41:
. Scenario: King Ryu
. Storyboard: Hiroyuki Kakudo
. Director: Hideki Hiroshima
. Animation Supervisor: Seizo Toma
Episode 42:
. Scenario: Yoshitaka Toshio
. Storyboard: Yoshitaka Yashima
. Director: Can't read it correctly, i'm sorry
. Animation Supervisor: Osamu Ishikawa
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
Source?Psykomatik wrote:Spoiler:
- Psykomatik
- Regular
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:37 am
- Lord Beerus
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 21430
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:20 pm
- Location: A temple on a giant tree
- Contact:
Re: "Dragon Ball Super" Animation Staff Discussion
I never had as drastic an issue with episode 5 compared to a lot of people, I think. The first half of the episode was horrendous, and I'm still not a fan of it even after the Blu-ray fixes.PMD wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm starting to notice that you guys here actually liked the infamous/legendary Episode 5. Can someone explain to me what are the reasons behind this trend? I'm not judging... just curious.
I did, however, always like many parts of the second half. I think that was a fairly common feeling among those who didn't get swept up in the whirlwind of vitriol. Tate and Ken did some nice work there. It's quite funny seeing it move far more and for greater periods of time than many of Super's recent episodes.
Anyway... Don't want to sound like I'm giving it retroactive praise... It's just not the worst episode of Super by a long shot. Episode 12 and 24 hold that title firmly.
---
RE: New Staff!
Good to see Toma making a return again. If he's now going to become a regular supervisor, then that only helps matters. The longer the rotation times, the better.
With the tournament supposedly being over by that point, I'm hoping he'll be able to have fun again like episode 4. Fingers crossed!
Follow me on Twitter for countless shitposts.
Deadtuber.
Deadtuber.












