Well we know the movie is supposed to continue from the events of the anime and that Goku and Vegeta do not have CSSB since they have auras in the trailer, so it would be a plothole if they don't use them at all for no reason.PFM18 wrote:I mean I feel like if one of them appears, then both will appear, because they are supposed to be equivalent forms to each other.
Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie #1 Thread: "Broly"
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Well a popular interpretation is that this will follow neither the manga or the anime exclusively, and it could simply be only Toriyama's story with no anime exclusive or manga exclusive plot points.CTAkuma wrote:Well we know the movie is supposed to continue from the events of the anime and that Goku and Vegeta do not have CSSB since they have auras in the trailer, so it would be a plothole if they don't use them at all for no reason.PFM18 wrote:I mean I feel like if one of them appears, then both will appear, because they are supposed to be equivalent forms to each other.
Spoiler:
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Toriyama thinks otherwise:PFM18 wrote:Well a popular interpretation is that this will follow neither the manga or the anime exclusively, and it could simply be only Toriyama's story with no anime exclusive or manga exclusive plot points.
The official website also features a quote from Akira Toriyama about Dragon Ball’s next adventure:
"The Dragon Ball Super movie this time around will be the next story that takes place after the anime that’s currently on TV. The content will shed a little light on previously unexplored topics having to do with Frieza and the Saiyans, and I think it will be a very enjoyable story that serves up a long-awaited formidable opponent!"
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I presume the movie will be written in such a way public who has only seen the first two movies or nothing concerning DB still can follow the story.
That's why they could skip certain transformations (like variants of 'Blue', UI ...) and characters (like Zeno, Grand Priest) that demand more explaination.
Gogeta's fusion would of course be explained in the movie itself.
The reason for this is not Toriyama wanting to tell his own story.
A lot of his script was shortened because of the movie.
It would simply demand too much explaination for people that haven't seen Super at all.
They want to market this movie to the biggest audience ever.
That's why they could skip certain transformations (like variants of 'Blue', UI ...) and characters (like Zeno, Grand Priest) that demand more explaination.
Gogeta's fusion would of course be explained in the movie itself.
The reason for this is not Toriyama wanting to tell his own story.
A lot of his script was shortened because of the movie.
It would simply demand too much explaination for people that haven't seen Super at all.
They want to market this movie to the biggest audience ever.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
At this point everyone knows that SSBKKx20 and Blue Evolution exist. They even reference the tournament of power in the trailer, you know something that newbies who only watched the 2 movies would scratch their heads atMister_Popo wrote:I presume the movie will be written in such a way public who has only seen the first two movies or nothing concerning DB still can follow the story.
That's why they could skip certain transformations (like variants of 'Blue', UI ...) and characters (like Zeno, Grand Priest) that demand more explaination.
Gogeta's fusion would of course be explained in the movie itself.
The reason for this is not Toriyama wanting to tell his own story.
A lot of his script was shortened because of the movie.
It would simply demand too much explaination for people that haven't seen Super at all.
They want to market this movie to the biggest audience ever.
-
RecolorSaiyan
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
You can't have SSB KK and not SSBE since the whole point of the latter was to close the gap with the former for Vegeta. Its also not like Vegeta did SSBE on accident, on 2 occasions in episode 127, he went from base to ssbe plus its his strongest form unlike say ssj2 which would make sense for him to skip. You would also just end up needlessly confusing fans and contradicting your own continuity
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
How is this confusing at all? It wouldn't make sense inuniverse when they are beaten and tired in Blue, but not use their strongest forms which they could tap in willingly unlike UI.RecolorSaiyan wrote:You can't have SSB KK and not SSBE since the whole point of the latter was to close the gap with the former for Vegeta. Its also not like Vegeta did SSBE on accident, on 2 occasions in episode 127, he went from base to ssbe plus its his strongest form unlike say ssj2 which would make sense for him to skip. You would also just end up needlessly confusing fans and contradicting your own continuity
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Yes, but this is going to be shown to an audience where even the first two movies weren't shown.CTAkuma wrote:At this point everyone knows that SSBKKx20 and Blue Evolution exist. They even reference the tournament of power in the trailer, you know something that newbies who only watched the 2 movies would scratch their heads atMister_Popo wrote:I presume the movie will be written in such a way public who has only seen the first two movies or nothing concerning DB still can follow the story.
That's why they could skip certain transformations (like variants of 'Blue', UI ...) and characters (like Zeno, Grand Priest) that demand more explaination.
Gogeta's fusion would of course be explained in the movie itself.
The reason for this is not Toriyama wanting to tell his own story.
A lot of his script was shortened because of the movie.
It would simply demand too much explaination for people that haven't seen Super at all.
They want to market this movie to the biggest audience ever.
They are going to play it relatively simple because of marketing purposes. There are going to be references to Super only, but not too much.
Casual Blue and Red are known with the crowd that has only seen the first two movies, or maybe haven't watched Super in detail.
The fact Vegeta gets a 'Red-upgrade' would be even an opportunity to explain the non-ritual use of the Red-form that was introduced during BOG to a broader audience.
Last edited by Mister_Popo on Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Just because something happened in the series doesn't mean it all has to be crammed into this movie. If the plot doesn't require SSBE, UI, SSBKK20, then it doesn't.
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I imagine if we see them it'll be after Broly activates Full Power Super Saiyan. We don't know much about SSBE but Kaioken isn't made for long sustained fights.
It would be weird if they didn't appear since essentially the same thing happened in the manga so they're basically 1:1 on transformations again. Manga Goku got bootleg Kaioken and UI Omen, mangq Vegeta got bootleg SSBE and anime Vegeta got SSG.
Depending how hard they want to push this 'back to basics' approach in refreshing the series, I could also see them being written out like Grades 2 and 3 for being to inefficient compared to normal SSB, or that movie Goku and Vegeta's SSB will be an 'enhanced' version similar to SSBE that's about as strong.
SS2 and 3 are no-shows so far too, and we've had plenty of discussion about UI. If you wanted to tidy up the series, the current selection the movie has shown would be a very efficient way to do that. Base form, the classic Super Saiyan, Super Saiyan God as the new Super Saiyan 2 (stronger/faster than 1 but more efficient than Blue) and Blue as the new SS3 with spectacular power at the cost of stamina. And unlike 1->2, there's a very nice visual distinction between the three forms so you're never unsure what they're using.
I'm surprisingly okay with that idea so long as they address why Kaioken/Evolution don't get used.
It would be weird if they didn't appear since essentially the same thing happened in the manga so they're basically 1:1 on transformations again. Manga Goku got bootleg Kaioken and UI Omen, mangq Vegeta got bootleg SSBE and anime Vegeta got SSG.
Depending how hard they want to push this 'back to basics' approach in refreshing the series, I could also see them being written out like Grades 2 and 3 for being to inefficient compared to normal SSB, or that movie Goku and Vegeta's SSB will be an 'enhanced' version similar to SSBE that's about as strong.
SS2 and 3 are no-shows so far too, and we've had plenty of discussion about UI. If you wanted to tidy up the series, the current selection the movie has shown would be a very efficient way to do that. Base form, the classic Super Saiyan, Super Saiyan God as the new Super Saiyan 2 (stronger/faster than 1 but more efficient than Blue) and Blue as the new SS3 with spectacular power at the cost of stamina. And unlike 1->2, there's a very nice visual distinction between the three forms so you're never unsure what they're using.
I'm surprisingly okay with that idea so long as they address why Kaioken/Evolution don't get used.
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
BlueBasilisk wrote: I'm surprisingly okay with that idea so long as they address why Kaioken/Evolution don't get used.
There might be a possibility that won't happen.
Why would they use Red a lot in the new movie?
'Blue' will probably be a big stamina-drainer as such (even without Kaioken or SSBE) within this movie.
It could be portrayed as a bit more powerful though as we are used to in Super, where it's used all the time (despite the 'stamina-drain', partly because of the perfect Ki-control, but nontheless it's used a lot).
- BlueBasilisk
- I Live Here
- Posts: 3062
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:58 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I didn't say they'd use God a lot. I'm not sure wha they'll do with it. I'm just saying I wouldn't have any issues with a hypothetical trimming of the transformation tree to a tidy 1-2-3 approach again so long as a decent explanation is given for it.Mister_Popo wrote:BlueBasilisk wrote: I'm surprisingly okay with that idea so long as they address why Kaioken/Evolution don't get used.
There might be a possibility that won't happen.
Why would they use Red a lot in the new movie?
'Blue' will probably be a big stamina-drainer as such (even without Kaioken or SSBE) within this movie.
It could be portrayed as a bit more powerful though as we are used to in Super, where it's used all the time (despite the 'stamina-drain', partly because of the perfect Ki-control, but nontheless it's used a lot).
-
RecolorSaiyan
- Regular
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 4:40 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
I'm no expert on how movies are made or production so i'll ask you guys.
Couldn't it be that in the script, toriyama just says something like " Goku and Vegeta go full power all out but get dominated by Broly" That would allow Toei and later Toyotaro to adapt it based on their own continuities. Then Nagamine would just tell the animators to use ssbe or ssbkk and toriyama seems agreeable to stuff as long as it doesn't hurts his overall narrative and whether they use regular ssb, ssbkk, ssbe, cssb, it wouldn't matter cause they get their heads caved in regardless. Or do you think he would be very specific that he only wants ssg and ssb and none of the other stuff beyond that ?
Couldn't it be that in the script, toriyama just says something like " Goku and Vegeta go full power all out but get dominated by Broly" That would allow Toei and later Toyotaro to adapt it based on their own continuities. Then Nagamine would just tell the animators to use ssbe or ssbkk and toriyama seems agreeable to stuff as long as it doesn't hurts his overall narrative and whether they use regular ssb, ssbkk, ssbe, cssb, it wouldn't matter cause they get their heads caved in regardless. Or do you think he would be very specific that he only wants ssg and ssb and none of the other stuff beyond that ?
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Problem is you have to adress them not using those forms when they used them pretty liberally previously in the Tournament, otherwise its a plothole for not using their strongest forms which they have acess to anytime they wantmute_proxy wrote:Just because something happened in the series doesn't mean it all has to be crammed into this movie. If the plot doesn't require SSBE, UI, SSBKK20, then it doesn't.
- Baggie_Saiyan
- Namekian Warrior
- Posts: 10315
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 5:22 pm
- Location: Atlantis.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Nagamine did say they are adapting Toriyama's script as is WITH the exception of action scenes so I don't see any reason why they couldn't. Plus Nagamine talked about how the battles are colour coded, if SSGSS Goku and Vegeta fight together KK will obviously be a different colour for Goku.RecolorSaiyan wrote:I'm no expert on how movies are made or production so i'll ask you guys.
Couldn't it be that in the script, toriyama just says something like " Goku and Vegeta go full power all out but get dominated by Broly" That would allow Toei and later Toyotaro to adapt it based on their own continuities. Then Nagamine would just tell the animators to use ssbe or ssbkk and toriyama seems agreeable to stuff as long as it doesn't hurts his overall narrative and whether they use regular ssb, ssbkk, ssbe, cssb, it wouldn't matter cause they get their heads caved in regardless. Or do you think he would be very specific that he only wants ssg and ssb and none of the other stuff beyond that ?
- Mister_Popo
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:12 pm
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
BlueBasilisk wrote:I didn't say they'd use God a lot. I'm not sure wha they'll do with it. I'm just saying I wouldn't have any issues with a hypothetical trimming of the transformation tree to a tidy 1-2-3 approach again so long as a decent explanation is given for it.Mister_Popo wrote:BlueBasilisk wrote: I'm surprisingly okay with that idea so long as they address why Kaioken/Evolution don't get used.
There might be a possibility that won't happen.
Why would they use Red a lot in the new movie?
'Blue' will probably be a big stamina-drainer as such (even without Kaioken or SSBE) within this movie.
It could be portrayed as a bit more powerful though as we are used to in Super, where it's used all the time (despite the 'stamina-drain', partly because of the perfect Ki-control, but nontheless it's used a lot).
I agree with you a slight explaination would be nice for us 'hardcore fans'. But during ROF-movie they didn't even explain us Blue thoroughly.
I would assume these steps are the easiest to understand for a broad audience:
Super Saiyan (significant power-up without God-Ki) < Super Saiyan God (Godly power, weaker than Blue but easier to maintain) < Super Saiyan Blue (Godly power, stronger than Red but more difficult to maintain) < Fusion
Ssj2 / ssj3 / ssjb evo / ssjb Kaioken don't need to furfill a role storywise within this movie.
I don't say we aren't going to see Blue Kaioken with certainty, but in order to keep it simple they might skip it or incorporate it rather subtle.
We might for instance get a slight red flair with Goku when he fires up to his max in Blue at a given point, without further reference or explaination.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
In the final episode Goku said he can't use UI anymore (at will). That might as well be the case with Vegeta's SSBE.CTAkuma wrote:Problem is you have to adress them not using those forms when they used them pretty liberally previously in the Tournament, otherwise its a plothole for not using their strongest forms which they have acess to anytime they wantmute_proxy wrote:Just because something happened in the series doesn't mean it all has to be crammed into this movie. If the plot doesn't require SSBE, UI, SSBKK20, then it doesn't.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Well obviously Goku can't use UI at will, but SSBKKx20 is free for use and it was never implied that Vegeta can't tap into SSBE again, infact after achieving it once he did it again afterwardsmute_proxy wrote:In the final episode Goku said he can't use UI anymore (at will). That might as well be the case with Vegeta's SSBE.
- mute_proxy
- Advanced Regular
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:09 am
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Kaioken is a technique Goku uses on top of his forms, it's not a separate transformation, so it all depends on him and the plot if he'll use it or not.CTAkuma wrote: Well obviously Goku can't use UI at will, but SSBKKx20 is free for use
CTAkuma wrote: and it was never implied that Vegeta can't tap into SSBE again, infact after achieving it once he did it again afterwards
SSBE has been described as Vegeta breaking through his limits. The same way UI was described. Goku achieved UI (omen in this case) multiple times also and now he can't use it. It seems it can only be used when pushed over the limit. (Disregarding the fact that SSBE is just a byproduct of Toei to make Vegeta at least a bit more relevant again.
Re: Official On-Going Dragon Ball Super Movie Thread: "Broly"
Point being exactly? These are forms they used regularly in the TOP, hell Goku used SSBKK through Super after Revival of F. SSBE has never been stated as "lost" or Vegeta "not being able to achieve it again", so he can freely use it at will. These forms don't have to be in the movie, but there has to be a logical explanation or flat out answer why they can't use it or it creates a plotholemute_proxy wrote:Kaioken is a technique Goku uses on top of his forms, it's not a separate transformation, so it all depends on him and the plot if he'll use it or not.CTAkuma wrote: Well obviously Goku can't use UI at will, but SSBKKx20 is free for use
CTAkuma wrote: and it was never implied that Vegeta can't tap into SSBE again, infact after achieving it once he did it again afterwards
SSBE has been described as Vegeta breaking through his limits. The same way UI was described. Goku achieved UI (omen in this case) multiple times also and now he can't use it. It seems it can only be used when pushed over the limit. (Disregarding the fact that SSBE is just a byproduct of Toei to make Vegeta at least a bit more relevant again.



