Was Freeza brought in too early?

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
FoolsGil
I Live Here
Posts: 4979
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 10:37 pm

Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by FoolsGil » Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:54 pm

Well, was he?

-There were no mortals that could challenge him.
-Every transformation he has brings his power to another insane limit.
-Just to give the heroes a chance, legends had to be created and zenkai had to become a thing, altering the cast dynamic forever and contradicting an important conversation Goku and Vegeta had before they fought.
-Upon his defeat every villain after him had to be stronger and more ridiculous and the heroes had to compensate by becoming even stronger in even shorter periods of time.
-Finally, it was the only arc done in space and the series never went back to the stars since.

I think he was brought in too early. If you place Freeza in any other shonen series, he'd be the final, or second to last villain in the series. And since it was proven that Toriyama had no intention to end the series at the Freeza arc, yet he made an end series boss a mid series boss, everything else that came after Vegeta's defeat on Earth, good or bad, can be be attributed to Freeza, even long after he's dead. Anyone else agree, or disagree?

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by precita » Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:59 pm

Well Freeza WAS intended to be the final villain and ultimate evil of the show, and he tied in with the Saiyan's backstory, so it made sense. In all fairness Freeza being the strongest in the universe still makes sense:

1. The Androids and Cell weren't created yet, so nobody would have known about them.

2. King Cold was probably weaker than his son, or else his father would be considered the strongest in the universe and not Freeza

3. Majin Buu was sealed away for millions of years

4. Dabura was from the Demon Realm

5. Beerus/Whis are Gods.


If it weren't for all the movie characters who aren't canon, GT, etc....then Freeza being the strongest in the universe still makes sense. He even knew about Buu and Beerus too.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Doctor. » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:02 pm

Definitely, and I think that Resurrection 'F' was Toriyama's way of making Freeza the villain he was supposed to be, that last challenge Goku and company had to face, since he's the most powerful mortal in the universe and, from here on out, other threats would be found in other universes. I personally think he executed the idea terribly, but that's another discussion. I think the Freeza arc was the pinnacle of DB's writing, and Freeza's character is probably the main reason for it.

User avatar
DemonRin
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:50 am
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by DemonRin » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:07 pm

precita wrote:Well Freeza WAS intended to be the final villain and ultimate evil of the show
Uh... no he wasn't......

In reality, and I think this also answers the main question above: Toriyama was always kindof a slapdash writer. He rarely planned things out, and mostly wrote stuff by the seat of his pants.

This is probably why Freeza feels like the "Final" big bad that he does. Because Toriyama wasn't planning long term, he was writing the arc as he went along.

I mean, at one point during the Saiyan arc, it's stated that the Saiyans are the "Strongest Warriors in the Universe".
That later gets hand waved as Vegeta's ego, but still, that arc treated the Saiyans kinda like "Final Bosses" too.

And the Piccolo Jr. arc felt REALLY "Final", so much so that Toriyama and/or his editors felt the need to include Kamesen'in breaking the fourth wall to tell the reader the story isn't over yet.
"FUNi should take [DBZ] out behind the woodshed, give it one last treat, then blow its f%#@$ng brains out before it attacks the baby again." ~Rocketman

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 4:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:20 pm

Doctor. wrote:Definitely, and I think that Resurrection 'F' was Toriyama's way of making Freeza the villain he was supposed to be, that last challenge Goku and company had to face, since he's the most powerful mortal in the universe and, from here on out, other threats would be found in other universes. I personally think he executed the idea terribly, but that's another discussion. I think the Freeza arc was the pinnacle of DB's writing, and Freeza's character is probably the main reason for it.

Agreed.

Personally. I think after Goku defeating Piccolo at the world martial arts tournament. The 5 year gap could have been used to introduce Raditz and other alien races and how Goku & company went from the confines of the Earth out to the solar system and beyond. While increasing the power levels from hundreds to thousands, to tens of thousands. Since from the end of the tournament to the Namek Saga its been 6+ years. That time could have been used for Goku & the others to travel from Earth and progress ( fight) their way to wards the center of the galaxy. Where Freeza has his empire's strong hold and is extorting the Namekians or w/e. If Toriyama had gone down this route we wouldn't need ridiculous zenkai boosts since the Z fighters would have been constantly getting trained through their battles. Heck you could even throw in 2 more additional years from the 4 year gap after Freeza's defeat. Giving Goku 8+ years to go from a scrub to achieving (legendary) super saiyan status. Then 1 year could have been taken off for Goku & others to train while Goku is missing. Trunks could have come from the future to warn off the androids coming in a year's time instead of 3. Instead of Gero it could have been the scientists of the Fujurin empire or the galactic patrol or w/e seeing the SSJ as a threat greater than Freeza. He is a Saiyan after all so other races may deem him to be someone who will bring havoc across the entire North galaxy. And from there we can progress as is, I guess.

But the above would have been my take on DBZ after the tournament of pt.1
"I was born in a small village. I was still a child when we were raided by soldiers. Foreign soldiers. Torn from my elders, I was made to speak their language. With each new post my masters changed. Along with the words they made me speak. With each change, I changed too. My thoughts, personality, how I saw right and wrong. Words - can - kill."
—Skull Face

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6333
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Cipher » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:22 pm

precita wrote:If it weren't for all the movie characters who aren't canon, GT, etc....then Freeza being the strongest in the universe still makes sense. He even knew about Buu and Beerus too.
Not even GT throws in anyone who has to be stronger than Freeza and alive at the same time. It's one of the reasons I actually like its early villains being suitably low-threat.

The gap between the heroes and the main villain is never that large again, though, or is at least never presented that way. I do think Freeza could have been scaled down a bit so that the leaps in the latter half of the arc aren't quite so absurd when you stop and think about them, but ... hindsight's 20/20. And despite embodying a number of my complaints with the series in regards to power-based one-upsmanship, I think the tension here actually works and the payoff is incredibly satisfying (at least with the manga's pacing).
Last edited by Cipher on Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Doctor. » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:27 pm

Cipher wrote:
precita wrote:If it weren't for all the movie characters who aren't canon, GT, etc....then Freeza being the strongest in the universe still makes sense. He even knew about Buu and Beerus too.
Not even GT throws in anyone who has to be stronger than Freeza and alive at the same time. It's one of the reasons I actually like its early villains being suitably low-threat.

The gap between the heroes and the main villain is never that large again, though, or is at least never presented that way. I do think Freeza could have been scaled down a bit so that the leaps in the latter half of the arc aren't quite so absurd when you stop and think about them, but ... hindsight's 20/20.
I'm not sure I understand. Most of GT's new antagonists, even at the beginning of the series, are at least at Cell and Boo's level, let alone Freeza.

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6333
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Cipher » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:29 pm

Doctor. wrote:I'm not sure I understand. Most of GT's new antagonists, even at the beginning of the series, are at least at Cell and Boo's level, let alone Freeza.
I don't believe base Goku is substantially stronger than he is at the end of Z. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

That means Lood and Rilld are the first two antagonists to necessarily be stronger than Freeza, with Redict being like ... somewhere kind of in his range. Everything fits a lot better that way, eye-em-oh.

I know a lot of viewers have other interpretations, but I've always thought they make everything way more of a clusterfuck than it needs to be.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Doctor. » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:32 pm

Cipher wrote:
Doctor. wrote:I'm not sure I understand. Most of GT's new antagonists, even at the beginning of the series, are at least at Cell and Boo's level, let alone Freeza.
I don't believe base Goku is substantially stronger than he is at the end of Z. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

That means Lood and Rilld are the first two antagonists to necessarily be stronger than Freeza, with Redict being like ... somewhere kind of in his range. Everything fits a lot better that way, eye-em-oh.
If his base form didn't improve much, then Goku would need Super Saiyan 3 to deal with Rild, and yet he managed just fine with only his normal state and Super Saiyan.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 4:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:35 pm

Strictly going by anime you could argue that EoZ base Goku= buu saga SSJ3 Goku. Then add another 5-8 years on top of that...
"I was born in a small village. I was still a child when we were raided by soldiers. Foreign soldiers. Torn from my elders, I was made to speak their language. With each new post my masters changed. Along with the words they made me speak. With each change, I changed too. My thoughts, personality, how I saw right and wrong. Words - can - kill."
—Skull Face

User avatar
Marco Polo
I Live Here
Posts: 2967
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:44 pm

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Marco Polo » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:36 pm

Toriyama should just have made Freeza the Emperor of a faraway country on Earth. Similarly the Saiyans should have been from a distant continent or something.

The Earth became so "small" after the Saiyan Saga, it's a damn shame. Look at the real world, there was tons of place of immense empires throughout history. There was no reason for Toriyama to introduce outer space concepts (which moved the series into sci-fi territories) instead of continuing to introduce different regions of Earth (which would have kept the fantasy aspect of the series).

Cipher
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6333
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Nagano
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Cipher » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:38 pm

Doctor. wrote:If his base form didn't improve much, then Goku would need Super Saiyan 3 to deal with Rild, and yet he managed just fine with only his normal state and Super Saiyan.
Or I could just interpret that Boo line so that things make better sense with how power-ups have worked in the series and how things play out in the show itself.

Maybe I'm grasping here, but since the series doesn't come down hard one way or the other, I'll lean toward the one that makes things more watchable for me. Like, there's no in-universe reason for the Sigma Force Cannon to be a Boo-level opponent. And Pan and Trunks aren't presented as being enormously below Goku like they'd have to be for that to work. It also makes a lot more sense for a possessed/powered-up Vegeta to be the first real threat to Goku without a major increase between series, along with Vegeta not being enormously stronger than Gohan or Goten.
Last edited by Cipher on Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 4:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:39 pm

To be fair even with the sci fi elements its still fantasy. Its just outer space fantasy as opposed to terrestrial fantasy.
"I was born in a small village. I was still a child when we were raided by soldiers. Foreign soldiers. Torn from my elders, I was made to speak their language. With each new post my masters changed. Along with the words they made me speak. With each change, I changed too. My thoughts, personality, how I saw right and wrong. Words - can - kill."
—Skull Face

User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:43 pm

We'd already met Kami/God and the characters had the power to level rather large landmasses and destroy the moon. The Saiyans and Freeza being Earthlings that ruled some other countries, while making Earth's diversity more impressive, would have made the characters themselves substantially less impressive IMO.
Direct translations of the Korean DB Online timeline and guidebook.
My personal "canon" and BP list. (Coming Soon)

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Doctor. » Wed Aug 19, 2015 7:58 pm

TheDevilsCorpse wrote:We'd already met Kami/God and the characters had the power to level rather large landmasses and destroy the moon. The Saiyans and Freeza being Earthlings that ruled some other countries, while making Earth's diversity more impressive, would have made the characters themselves substantially less impressive IMO.
Plus, I'm sure that the Saiyan mythology would have been ruined. How did Freeza destroy the Saiyans? Committing genocide, destroying a continent? Well, I'm sure there had to have been records of their existence, especially in a world with such advanced technology as Dragon Ball's Earth. Surely someone would know that the Saiyans that were exterminated 20 to 30 years ago possessed a tail and they'd link it to Goku.

precita
Banned
Posts: 6037
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2015 3:10 pm

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by precita » Wed Aug 19, 2015 8:17 pm

I don't know why cyborg parts make you so much more powerful in Dragonball. Cyborg Freeza was apparently much stronger than Freeza was on Namek. The Androids/Cell all much stronger than anyone they met before.

How does making yourself into part machine make you so powerful?

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2015 4:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Sun Wukong » Wed Aug 19, 2015 8:22 pm

B/c the plot required it to be so. That's why cyborgs are so powerful.
"I was born in a small village. I was still a child when we were raided by soldiers. Foreign soldiers. Torn from my elders, I was made to speak their language. With each new post my masters changed. Along with the words they made me speak. With each change, I changed too. My thoughts, personality, how I saw right and wrong. Words - can - kill."
—Skull Face

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:33 pm

FoolsGil wrote:Well, was he?

-There were no mortals that could challenge him.
-Every transformation he has brings his power to another insane limit.
-Just to give the heroes a chance, legends had to be created and zenkai had to become a thing, altering the cast dynamic forever and contradicting an important conversation Goku and Vegeta had before they fought.
-Upon his defeat every villain after him had to be stronger and more ridiculous and the heroes had to compensate by becoming even stronger in even shorter periods of time.
-Finally, it was the only arc done in space and the series never went back to the stars since.

I think he was brought in too early. If you place Freeza in any other shonen series, he'd be the final, or second to last villain in the series. And since it was proven that Toriyama had no intention to end the series at the Freeza arc, yet he made an end series boss a mid series boss, everything else that came after Vegeta's defeat on Earth, good or bad, can be be attributed to Freeza, even long after he's dead. Anyone else agree, or disagree?
-That's the case for every villain in every arc before the heroes beat them. Remember when Piccolo Daimao was the greatest threat the world had ever seen, an ancient demon-god who easily defeated everybody and couldn't be matched even by Roshi's master?
-Again, this also applies to every other villain since Piccolo Daimao.
-There is no legend. Vegeta was relating history. It also didn't have to exist- Toriyama could have simply made Freeza less obscenely more powerful than everybody else.
-Again, this applies to every other villain.
-GT. Also, a significant portion of the Buu arc happens outside of Earth; Babidi's ship teleports everybody to three different planets, Gohan and Goku spend most of the arc chilling in the Kaioshin Realm, and the final battle takes place there.

Nah, I don't think I agree with that. Buu is the best possible final villain, surpassing the previous villains in every way; it never really made sense to have any serious threat come after him (or, at least, anyone way stronger than his stronger forms). I think Freeza's importance is really overblown by fans. What makes Freeza any more worthy of "final boss" status than, say, Vegeta? Freeza's pretty much a blatant rehash of him.

Buu and Cell both pack a much higher threat level, by being stronger, accomplishing more, killing more people (including several heroes), and by having skills/abilities other than "has a lot of ki". They also have reason to be stronger too; Buu is a god-eating ancient abomination, and Cell is a chimera made up of the universe's strongest warriors. Freeza, on the other hand... is any reason ever given for him being literally thousands of times stronger than his ultra-mutant-prodigy henchmen, as well as the person who was previously stated to be the strongest in the universe, other than "he just is"?
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Doctor.
Banned
Posts: 10558
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:02 am
Location: Portugal

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by Doctor. » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:41 pm

Cell did not kill more people than Freeza.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: Was Freeza brought in too early?

Post by RandomGuy96 » Wed Aug 19, 2015 9:42 pm

Doctor. wrote:Cell did not kill more people than Freeza.
Directly? Yeah he did. Heck, Freeza only killed a handful of people on-screen.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

Post Reply