blain218 wrote:It makes no sense how anyone can say the manga has better storytelling than the anime, especially when it comes to the horrible changes Toyotaro made to the Black arc and the reduced focus on the supporting cast compare the anime version.
And Vegeta's new form was explained in the ToP. It was him breaking his limits in similar manner as Goku did according to Whis.
The manga does a better job with Jiren I'll give it that, but the manga version of the ToP is already looking worse than the anime, especially with how Toyotaro fails to give spotlight to much of the other combatants of the ToP compared to the anime and makes them look even less of a threat.
I mean.....I already went into excruciating detail to explain how the anime's storytelling is pretty awful to me, in this last arc alone, so I'm not sure how to address your inability to process such an opinion without just mindlessly repeating myself. I'm not sure which "horrible changes" to the Black arc you could be thinking of, besides Black no longer being a smug meme machine. Like, I love that bit about anime Black, but it's not anything essential for the overall narrative to flow the way it needs to, so its omission (if it can even be called that) doesn't really count as a "horrible change", to me, and I'm unsure how it's supposed to. And if there's something else (like, "oh no, that bastard Toyotaro removed that stupid grandfather paradox from Black's origins, and now it's actually coherent!"), then I'm all ears.
It doesn't terribly matter to me if Vegeta's new form is explained or not. It serves no narrative purpose. It just adds more visual flair. It just gives Vegeta an opportunity to monologue and preach about how much he cares about others, and how that gives him strength now. Not only is that a stilted and awkward way of delivering that information, but it's also
old information.
Welcome to 2013! So much for using new forms to elucidate character traits, like the original manga did. And on top of acting purely in service of redundant character beats, there was also no build up for it. We didn't go through this arc anticipating Blue to evolve. Hell, in the manga, Blue already evolved an arc prior, and it did so by Goku figuring out a solution to a glaring flaw it had
two arcs prior (that the anime didn't ever introduce). And come on. Let's not pretend that "breaking one's limits" is some sweet new concept in this series. That's as generic, stale, uncreative, and by the numbers of an explanation as they come.
Most of those other combatants weren't a threat though, and they didn't serve much of a role in telling the story that was told. I'm glad that time isn't being wasted on them. And, honestly, I really like Tenshinhan, and would have loved to see him mix and match some of his crazy techniques with some others that he'd yet to use (making the Dodonpa sharper? Stacking his split body technique with Kaioken?), but if you're implying character cheerleading, like, "my boy deserved a good showing!", like this is some sporting event and you're rooting for your favorite athlete, rather than actually consuming this like a story, then you've lost me.
Characters existing doesn't mean that they have to shine, or be given focus. Not every single individual person is at the forefront of every story to be told. When I'm telling my friends about something that happened to me at the store, I'm not going to spotlight literally every person who was there, because not everyone is relevant to the big major important thing that ended up happening to me while I was there. It's a story about me, and what happened to me, and how it changed me. Not everyone played a role in that. Some people were in the background. If I got robbed by some dude while I was there, I don't need to spend 10 minutes of the story explaining what my dumb kid brother was doing at school while it was going on, or what was going through the mind of some old lady who literally contributed nothing to my newfound fear of going outside. If characters like Krillin and Tenshinhan and all of these other dudes from other universes aren't terribly relevant to Goku reaching a new milestone in his training with Whis, or Freeza, #17, and Jiren slowly learning the value of camaraderie, then they warrant a background tertiary role in the story. They don't warrant episodic spotlights. That just bogs the story down, makes it needlessly fluffy and tedious to slog through, and makes me pine for a shorter version.
blain218 wrote:Making a character completely useless just to build tension is simply bad writing.
Can you explain why you find that to be bad writing?
blain218 wrote:So you would dismiss everything that makes a story aesthetically engaging just for a more structured narrative? That has extremely bad taste written all over it. Characters are what carry a story. When you devalue the characters you devalue the story. Giving the characters more development and interactions increases the quality of the work in general, which is why the anime version of the Black arc is vastly superior to its manga version for example and modern dramas like Game of Thones and Breaking Bad are so appealing
And whats with all these ridiculous complaints about characters "regressing" in the anime? Characters doing what they normally do isn't "regression", that's just consistent writing. And just because a character doesn't "change" doesn't mean they don't develop.
What does it mean for a story to be "aesthetically engaging"? How is that different or distinct from a more structured narrative? And if it's indeed different, how is it better?
You seem to believe that a character's "value" is determined by how active and competent they are. Why is that the be all end all? Why can't a character be valuable to the telling of a story because they help to elucidate something new about a different, more important character, or provide the impetus for them changing in some way? Why can their incompetence or inactivity not be an acceptable source of conflict? If I were to tell a story about how my incompetent, lazy, alcoholic mother drove me to depression, and how I slowly dug myself out of the depressive rut, then my mother, as a character, is actually incredibly valuable to this story. If I were to tell a story about how I went to prison for running someone over and killing them, and I slowly worked my way up the ranks of some gang, then the dude I ran over would be incredibly useful to the story, despite not amounting to anything by himself, and being killed off immediately.
I'm not sure what kind of actual substance "interactions" are supposed to really add. Let's assume two people who had never talked before have a conversation for the first time, they interact......but it doesn't amount to anything, it doesn't provide any conflict, they don't act any differently than they did before, and there's nothing new revealed about them by this exchange. But since they got to banter and exchange catch-phrases, that somehow elevates the work? I'm not following. That just seems like you're thirsty for shallow fanservice, for the sheer novelty of characters doing things with other characters for the first time, regardless of what comes from it.
If character development isn't change, then what is it?